Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited (IBULHSGFIN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBULHSGFIN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBULHSGFIN.NS | ₹164.55 | +0.09% | 98B | 6.98 | ₹23.57 | N/A |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹73.09 | -7.63% | 631.7B | 25.54 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹495.20 | -0.21% | 278.4B | 5.08 | ₹99.72 | +1.98% |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹495.25 | -0.21% | 278.4B | 5.08 | ₹99.71 | +1.98% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹755.05 | -5.95% | 207B | 9.48 | ₹83.82 | +0.63% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹756.75 | -5.85% | 206.9B | 9.49 | ₹83.75 | +0.63% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹448.85 | -4.76% | 198.4B | 19.56 | ₹23.33 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹149.50 | +1.70% | 120.6B | 8.07 | ₹18.38 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.NS | ₹149.52 | +1.80% | 120.6B | 8.08 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs HDFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 631.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹73.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs LICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while LICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹495.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas LICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check LICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹495.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 207B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹755.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 206.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹756.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹448.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹149.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹792.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹793.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs APTUS.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹194.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs APTUS.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹194.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹904.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs IBULHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while IBULHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹164.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas IBULHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check IBULHSGFIN.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹902.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs AAVAS.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,078.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs AAVAS.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,078.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹754.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹747.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹348.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹349.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹131.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹131.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs SRGHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, SRGHFL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while SRGHFL.NS trades at ₹242.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas SRGHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SRGHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check SRGHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹230.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs RELHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs RHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to RHFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check RHFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs RHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to RHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check RHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs TFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, TFL.BO has a market cap of 694.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while TFL.BO trades at ₹11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas TFL.BO's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TFL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to TFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check TFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs TFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 687.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while TFL.NS trades at ₹11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check TFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs RFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, RFL.BO has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while RFL.BO trades at ₹101.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas RFL.BO's P/E ratio is -193.45. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RFL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to RFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check RFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 319.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -55.27. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.NS vs DHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.NS stands at 98B. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.NS is priced at ₹164.55, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.98, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.NS is more volatile compared to DHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.NS.Check DHFL.NS's competition here