Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited (IBULHSGFIN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBULHSGFIN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBULHSGFIN.BO | ₹164.45 | -1.05% | 97B | 6.97 | ₹23.58 | N/A |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹75.85 | -4.15% | 631.7B | 25.54 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹506.20 | +2.01% | 278.4B | 5.08 | ₹99.72 | +1.98% |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹506.05 | +1.96% | 278.4B | 5.08 | ₹99.71 | +1.98% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹794.65 | -1.02% | 207B | 9.48 | ₹83.82 | +0.63% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹794.40 | -1.16% | 206.9B | 9.49 | ₹83.75 | +0.63% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹456.35 | -3.17% | 198.4B | 19.56 | ₹23.33 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹148.40 | +0.95% | 120.6B | 8.07 | ₹18.38 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.NS | ₹148.35 | +1.00% | 120.6B | 8.08 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs HDFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 631.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs LICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while LICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹506.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas LICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹506.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 207B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹794.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 206.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹794.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹456.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹148.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹148.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹821.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹821.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs APTUS.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹197.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs APTUS.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹197.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while IBULHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹164.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas IBULHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹929.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs AAVAS.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,110.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs AAVAS.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹736.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹734.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹369.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹367.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹135.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹134.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs SRGHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, SRGHFL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while SRGHFL.NS trades at ₹232.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas SRGHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRGHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check SRGHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹230.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs RELHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs RHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to RHFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check RHFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs RHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to RHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check RHFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs TFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, TFL.BO has a market cap of 694.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while TFL.BO trades at ₹12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas TFL.BO's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check TFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs TFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 687.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while TFL.NS trades at ₹12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check TFL.NS's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs RFL.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, RFL.BO has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while RFL.BO trades at ₹106.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas RFL.BO's P/E ratio is -193.45. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RFL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to RFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check RFL.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 319.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -55.27. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
IBULHSGFIN.BO vs DHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
IBULHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBULHSGFIN.BO stands at 97B. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBULHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹164.45, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBULHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBULHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to DHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBULHSGFIN.BO.Check DHFL.NS's competition here