Iberdrola, S.A.
Iberdrola, S.A. (IBDSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBDSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBDSF | $22.87 | +1.55% | 154.5B | 23.10 | $0.99 | +3.18% |
| IBDRY | $90.62 | +0.54% | 149.2B | 22.95 | $3.94 | +3.29% |
| ESOCF | $11.56 | +2.41% | 113.9B | 16.23 | $0.70 | +4.97% |
| ENLAY | $10.97 | +1.01% | 111.4B | 15.90 | $0.69 | +3.89% |
| ENGIY | $31.73 | +0.89% | 80.4B | 13.53 | $2.34 | +5.31% |
| ENGQF | $32.23 | +0.38% | 78.3B | 13.78 | $2.34 | +5.23% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | N/A |
| EONGY | $22.78 | +1.88% | 59.8B | 17.34 | $1.32 | +2.70% |
| ENAKF | $21.35 | +0.00% | 55.8B | 16.17 | $1.32 | +2.89% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBDSF vs IBDRY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while IBDRY trades at $90.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IBDRY's competition here
IBDSF vs ESOCF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ESOCF trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ESOCF's competition here
IBDSF vs ENLAY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ENLAY trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENLAY's competition here
IBDSF vs ENGIY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ENGIY trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENGIY's competition here
IBDSF vs ENGQF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ENGQF trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENGQF's competition here
IBDSF vs PPWLM Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PPWLM's competition here
IBDSF vs EONGY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while EONGY trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EONGY's competition here
IBDSF vs ENAKF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ENAKF trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENAKF's competition here
IBDSF vs PPWLO Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PPWLO's competition here
IBDSF vs ECIFF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ECIFF's competition here
IBDSF vs ECIFY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ECIFY's competition here
IBDSF vs RWEOY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while RWEOY trades at $64.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check RWEOY's competition here
IBDSF vs RWNFF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while RWNFF trades at $64.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check RWNFF's competition here
IBDSF vs SSEZF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while SSEZF trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check SSEZF's competition here
IBDSF vs SSEZY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while SSEZY trades at $36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check SSEZY's competition here
IBDSF vs ELCPF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ELCPF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ELCPF's competition here
IBDSF vs EDPFY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while EDPFY trades at $50.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EDPFY's competition here
IBDSF vs CHUEF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CHUEF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CHUEF's competition here
IBDSF vs AEMMY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while AEMMY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check AEMMY's competition here
IBDSF vs AEMMF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while AEMMF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check AEMMF's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUAF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CDUAF trades at $35.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 322.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUAF's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUUF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUUF's competition here
IBDSF vs CUTLF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CUTLF trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CUTLF's competition here
IBDSF vs HRASF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while HRASF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check HRASF's competition here
IBDSF vs CNAUF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CNAUF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACLTF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ACLTF trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACLTF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACEJF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACEJF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACLLF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ACLLF trades at $48.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 49.86. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACLLF's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUTF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUTF's competition here
IBDSF vs IRDEY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while IRDEY trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IRDEY's competition here
IBDSF vs IRDEF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while IRDEF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IRDEF's competition here
IBDSF vs CSGEF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CSGEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CSGEF's competition here
IBDSF vs CNUTF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CNUTF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CNUTF's competition here
IBDSF vs VETTF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while VETTF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check VETTF's competition here
IBDSF vs GLVNF Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check GLVNF's competition here
IBDSF vs ARAO Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ARAO's competition here
IBDSF vs PBEV Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PBEV's competition here
IBDSF vs CMNR Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CMNR's competition here
IBDSF vs EVNVY Comparison March 2026
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 154.5B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $22.87, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.10, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EVNVY's competition here