Iberdrola, S.A.
Iberdrola, S.A. (IBDSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBDSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBDSF | $18.19 | +3.12% | 109.7B | 20.89 | $0.87 | +3.23% |
| IBDRY | $72.34 | +0.72% | 109B | 20.56 | $3.51 | +3.72% |
| ENLAY | $9.03 | +0.89% | 93B | 11.43 | $0.79 | +2.91% |
| ESOCF | $9.12 | +0.44% | 91.6B | 11.57 | $0.78 | +5.54% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +3.62% |
| ENGQF | $23.09 | +0.01% | 57.4B | 12.25 | $1.93 | +7.13% |
| ENGIY | $23.21 | +0.19% | 56.3B | 11.96 | $1.94 | +7.25% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +3.62% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | +0.00% | 53.6B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | +0.00% | 53.1B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBDSF vs IBDRY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while IBDRY trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IBDRY's competition here
IBDSF vs ENLAY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ENLAY trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENLAY's competition here
IBDSF vs ESOCF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ESOCF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ESOCF's competition here
IBDSF vs PPWLM Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PPWLM's competition here
IBDSF vs ENGQF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ENGQF trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENGQF's competition here
IBDSF vs ENGIY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ENGIY trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENGIY's competition here
IBDSF vs PPWLO Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PPWLO's competition here
IBDSF vs ECIFF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ECIFF's competition here
IBDSF vs ECIFY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ECIFY's competition here
IBDSF vs EONGY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while EONGY trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EONGY's competition here
IBDSF vs ENAKF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ENAKF trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ENAKF's competition here
IBDSF vs RWNFF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while RWNFF trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check RWNFF's competition here
IBDSF vs RWEOY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while RWEOY trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check RWEOY's competition here
IBDSF vs SSEZY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while SSEZY trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check SSEZY's competition here
IBDSF vs SSEZF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while SSEZF trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check SSEZF's competition here
IBDSF vs EDPFY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while EDPFY trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EDPFY's competition here
IBDSF vs ELCPF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ELCPF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ELCPF's competition here
IBDSF vs CHUEF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CHUEF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CHUEF's competition here
IBDSF vs AEMMF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check AEMMF's competition here
IBDSF vs AEMMY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while AEMMY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check AEMMY's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUUF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUUF's competition here
IBDSF vs CNAUF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CNAUF's competition here
IBDSF vs CUTLF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CUTLF trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CUTLF's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUTF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUTF's competition here
IBDSF vs CNUTF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CNUTF's competition here
IBDSF vs CDUAF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CDUAF trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CDUAF's competition here
IBDSF vs HRASF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while HRASF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check HRASF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACEJF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACEJF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACLLF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ACLLF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACLLF's competition here
IBDSF vs ACLTF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ACLTF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ACLTF's competition here
IBDSF vs IRDEF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while IRDEF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IRDEF's competition here
IBDSF vs CSGEF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CSGEF's competition here
IBDSF vs VETTF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while VETTF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check VETTF's competition here
IBDSF vs IRDEY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check IRDEY's competition here
IBDSF vs GLVNF Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check GLVNF's competition here
IBDSF vs PBEV Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check PBEV's competition here
IBDSF vs CMNR Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check CMNR's competition here
IBDSF vs ARAO Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check ARAO's competition here
IBDSF vs EVNVY Comparison July 2025
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 109.7B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.19, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.89, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.Check EVNVY's competition here