Iberdrola, S.A.
Iberdrola, S.A. IBDSF Peers
See (IBDSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBDSF | $18.71 | -0.58% | 116.7B | 26.35 | $0.71 | +2.66% |
| IBDRY | $74.65 | -1.26% | 116.5B | 26.47 | $2.82 | +2.60% |
| ENLAY | $9.17 | -1.08% | 94.9B | 12.07 | $0.76 | +4.68% |
| ESOCF | $9.25 | -0.67% | 93.9B | 12.01 | $0.77 | +5.72% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| ENGIY | $22.98 | +0.97% | 55.8B | 12.16 | $1.89 | +8.45% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| ENGQF | $22.56 | -1.02% | 54.7B | 12.00 | $1.88 | +8.62% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | N/A | 53.6B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | N/A | 53.1B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBDSF vs IBDRY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while IBDRY trades at $74.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ENLAY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ENLAY trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ESOCF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ESOCF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs PPWLM Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ENGIY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ENGIY trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs PPWLO Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ENGQF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ENGQF trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ECIFF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ECIFY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs EONGY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while EONGY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ENAKF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ENAKF trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs RWEOY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while RWEOY trades at $40.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs RWNFF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while RWNFF trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs SSEZF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while SSEZF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs SSEZY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while SSEZY trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs EDPFY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while EDPFY trades at $41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ELCPF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ELCPF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs AEMMF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs AEMMY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while AEMMY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CHUEF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CHUEF trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CDUUF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CDUAF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CDUAF trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CNAUF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CNAUF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CUTLF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CUTLF trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CDUTF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CNUTF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs HRASF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while HRASF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ACEJF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ACLTF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ACLTF trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ACLLF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ACLLF trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs IRDEF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while IRDEF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CSGEF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs IRDEY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs VETTF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while VETTF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs GLVNF Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs PBEV Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs CMNR Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs ARAO Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.
IBDSF vs EVNVY Comparison
IBDSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBDSF stands at 116.7B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IBDSF is priced at $18.71, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBDSF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, IBDSF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBDSF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBDSF.