iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBC3.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBC3.F | €4.01 | +0.92% | 24.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.78% |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €361.87 | -0.15% | 3T | 17.10 | €21.16 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €313.42 | -0.15% | 2.6T | 17.10 | €18.32 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €305.98 | -0.10% | 2.6T | 16.89 | €18.11 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €145.08 | +3.13% | 178B | 45.65 | €3.18 | +2.48% |
| ZPDW.DE | €80.68 | +0.50% | 125.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| IWLE.DE | €9.32 | +1.13% | 119.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.19% |
| SXR8.DE | €590.30 | +0.55% | 110.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €105.13 | +0.54% | 102.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IBC3.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €361.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €313.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €305.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs BBN1.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while BBN1.F trades at €145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check BBN1.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while ZPDW.DE trades at €80.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SXR8.DE trades at €590.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EUNL.DE trades at €105.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while U1FB.DE trades at €25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VUAA.DE trades at €105.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VUSA.DE trades at €104.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SXRZ.DE trades at €253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VGWL.DE trades at €133.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs E500.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while E500.DE trades at €49.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check E500.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs P500.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while P500.DE trades at €1,097.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check P500.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs D500.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while D500.DE trades at €51.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check D500.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VWCE.DE trades at €136.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VGWL.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VGWL.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs A4S.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check A4S.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,097.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
IBC3.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IS3N.DE trades at €35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while AW1Q.DE trades at €18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SPY5.DE trades at €553.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs NQSE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while LYP2.DE trades at €319.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 6TVM.DE trades at €56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while LYPS.DE trades at €56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
IBC3.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XDWD.DE trades at €115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XDWL.DE trades at €95.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs TR1.DU Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while TR1.DU trades at €89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check TR1.DU's competition here
IBC3.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IUSA.DE trades at €55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EDMU.DE trades at €10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EQQQ.DE trades at €491.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while QDVE.DE trades at €32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IUSQ.DE trades at €87.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while JUHE.DE trades at €51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SPPW.DE trades at €38.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SLUS.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EUNK.DE trades at €88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs DWS.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while DWS.DE trades at €54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check DWS.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while JREU.DE trades at €55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check JREU.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while JRUD.DE trades at €51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
IBC3.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XD9E.DE trades at €130.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XD9U.DE trades at €162.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
IBC3.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while LYYA.DE trades at €358.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while STXH.DE trades at €146.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check STXH.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XDEW.DE trades at €88.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while D5BM.DE trades at €110.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while LYP6.DE trades at €269.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXS1.DE trades at €201.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXSA.DE trades at €56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VGVE.DE trades at €103.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VGVF.DE trades at €107.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs CBUE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IQQW.DE trades at €76.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XWEH.DE trades at €45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while DBXW.DE trades at €112.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XZMU.DE trades at €60.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXW1.DE trades at €55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EUNW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while VGWD.DE trades at €66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IBCF.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IBCF.DE trades at €134.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IBCF.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check DBXE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SXR7.DE trades at €207.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XMME.DE trades at €58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XMME.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while H4ZF.DE trades at €55.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €55.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
IBC3.F vs XIEE.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XIEE.DE trades at €79.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XIEE.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check LCUW.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while XZW0.DE trades at €41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs EXIC.F Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check EXIC.F's competition here
IBC3.F vs DBXD.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while DBXD.DE trades at €228.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
IBC3.F vs SPYY.DE Comparison August 2025
IBC3.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBC3.F stands at 24.6B. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBC3.F is priced at €4.01, while SPYY.DE trades at €231.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBC3.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IBC3.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IBC3.F is less volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBC3.F.Check SPYY.DE's competition here