SK hynix Inc.
SK hynix Inc. (HY9H.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HY9H.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HY9H.F | €564.00 | +4.83% | 381.1B | 18.78 | €29.40 | +0.11% |
| NVD.DE | €159.30 | +2.25% | 3.9T | 37.75 | €4.22 | +0.02% |
| NVD.F | €159.38 | +2.30% | 3.9T | 37.55 | €4.22 | +0.02% |
| TSFA.F | €299.50 | -1.64% | 1.5T | 33.43 | €8.93 | +0.70% |
| 1YD.DE | €297.40 | +0.15% | 1.4T | 72.36 | €4.11 | +0.70% |
| ASME.DE | €1,178.20 | +2.70% | 454.1B | 47.60 | €24.75 | +0.55% |
| MTE.DE | €352.60 | +7.58% | 396.9B | 38.58 | €9.14 | +0.11% |
| AMD.DE | €175.58 | +3.25% | 286.3B | 78.38 | €2.24 | N/A |
| AP2.DE | €301.40 | +6.07% | 239.2B | 35.84 | €8.41 | +0.52% |
| INL.DE | €40.56 | +6.05% | 202.6B | -811.20 | -€0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HY9H.F vs NVD.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while NVD.DE trades at €159.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check NVD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs NVD.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while NVD.F trades at €159.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check NVD.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs TSFA.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while TSFA.F trades at €299.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check TSFA.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs 1YD.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while 1YD.DE trades at €297.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 72.36. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ASME.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 454.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while ASME.DE trades at €1,178.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 47.60. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ASME.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MTE.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 396.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while MTE.DE trades at €352.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MTE.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AMD.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 286.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while AMD.DE trades at €175.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 78.38. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AMD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AP2.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while AP2.DE trades at €301.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AP2.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs INL.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 202.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while INL.DE trades at €40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -811.20. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to INL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check INL.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs INL.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 201.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while INL.F trades at €40.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -806.00. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check INL.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs KLA.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while KLA.DE trades at €1,256.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check KLA.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs TII.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while TII.DE trades at €170.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check TII.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ANL.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 133.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while ANL.DE trades at €274.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ANL.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs QCI.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while QCI.DE trades at €116.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check QCI.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs LAR.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check LAR.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs IFX.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while IFX.DE trades at €41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check IFX.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs VNX.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while VNX.DE trades at €175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check VNX.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MCP.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while MCP.DE trades at €56.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is -217.04. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MCP.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SGM.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while SGM.DE trades at €29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 195.03. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SGM.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MXI.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MXI.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs CR6.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CR6.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AWM.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while AWM.DE trades at €47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AWM.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs 2QO.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AIX2.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while AIX2.F trades at €65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 42.76. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AIX2.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs WAF1.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AIXA.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while AIXA.DE trades at €31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs RMB.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check RMB.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ELG.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while ELG.DE trades at €142.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ELG.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SOH1.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while SOH1.F trades at €44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 159.29. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SOH1.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs WAF.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while WAF.DE trades at €51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is -55.43. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check WAF.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs CPIA.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while CPIA.F trades at €32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 85.26. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CPIA.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs SMHN.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while SMHN.DE trades at €54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SIS.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 552.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while SIS.DE trades at €53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is 48.11. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SIS.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs CTNK.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while CTNK.F trades at €10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CTNK.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs M5Z.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs M5Z.F Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, M5Z.F has a market cap of 726.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while M5Z.F trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas M5Z.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to M5Z.F's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to M5Z.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check M5Z.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs DQW1.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MVIN.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs XIX.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, XIX.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while XIX.DE trades at €191.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas XIX.DE's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to XIX.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to XIX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check XIX.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs DLG.DE Comparison March 2026
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 381.1B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €564.00, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check DLG.DE's competition here