SK hynix Inc.
SK hynix Inc. HY9H.F Peers
See (HY9H.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HY9H.F | €181.50 | -0.55% | 123.9B | 7.66 | €23.44 | +0.08% |
| NVD.F | €133.94 | -0.22% | 3.2T | 48.37 | €2.69 | +0.03% |
| NVD.DE | €133.94 | +0.00% | 3.2T | 48.36 | €2.69 | +0.03% |
| 1YD.DE | €235.00 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 96.71 | €2.34 | +0.94% |
| TSFA.F | €192.00 | -0.31% | 987.4B | 25.76 | €7.39 | +0.80% |
| ASME.DE | €680.10 | +0.00% | 262.8B | 30.19 | €22.13 | +0.84% |
| AMD.DE | €121.42 | +0.00% | 188B | 99.13 | €1.17 | N/A |
| TII.DE | €176.68 | +0.00% | 160.7B | 38.54 | €4.59 | +2.88% |
| QCI.DE | €135.04 | +0.00% | 148.4B | 15.84 | €8.53 | +2.39% |
| AP2.DE | €156.68 | +0.00% | 124.3B | 22.04 | €7.03 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HY9H.F vs NVD.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while NVD.F trades at €133.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs NVD.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while NVD.DE trades at €133.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs 1YD.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while 1YD.DE trades at €235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 96.71. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs TSFA.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 987.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while TSFA.F trades at €192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs ASME.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 262.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while ASME.DE trades at €680.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs AMD.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while AMD.DE trades at €121.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 99.13. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs TII.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while TII.DE trades at €176.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs QCI.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while QCI.DE trades at €135.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs AP2.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while AP2.DE trades at €156.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs MTE.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while MTE.DE trades at €105.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs KLA.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while KLA.DE trades at €760.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs ANL.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while ANL.DE trades at €198.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs LAR.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs INL.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while INL.F trades at €19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs INL.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while INL.DE trades at €19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to INL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs IFX.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while IFX.DE trades at €36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs VNX.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while VNX.DE trades at €156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs MXI.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs SGM.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while SGM.DE trades at €25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs AWM.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while AWM.DE trades at €63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs CR6.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs 2QO.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs WAF1.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs RMB.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs AIXA.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while AIXA.DE trades at €15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs AIX2.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while AIX2.F trades at €31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs SOH1.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while SOH1.F trades at €46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs ELG.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while ELG.DE trades at €89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs WAF.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while WAF.DE trades at €40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs SMHN.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 861.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while SMHN.DE trades at €46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs SIS.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 599.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while SIS.DE trades at €58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs CPIA.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 534.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while CPIA.F trades at €15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs CTNK.F Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while CTNK.F trades at €5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs M5Z.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs DQW1.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs MVIN.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs DLG.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.
HY9H.F vs MCP.DE Comparison
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 123.9B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €181.50, while MCP.DE trades at €63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 7.66, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.