SK hynix Inc.
SK hynix Inc. (HY9H.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HY9H.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HY9H.F | €163.00 | -8.43% | 110.5B | 6.94 | €23.06 | +0.24% |
| NVD.DE | €151.60 | -3.61% | 3.7T | 56.31 | €2.69 | +0.02% |
| NVD.F | €151.60 | -2.53% | 3.7T | 55.97 | €2.68 | +0.02% |
| 1YD.DE | €252.75 | -3.09% | 1.2T | 104.46 | €2.40 | +0.85% |
| TSFA.F | €204.00 | -3.77% | 1.1T | 28.06 | €7.27 | +0.79% |
| AMD.DE | €151.36 | -3.32% | 240.6B | 122.61 | €1.21 | N/A |
| ASME.DE | €604.20 | -1.44% | 234.1B | 24.73 | €24.07 | +1.09% |
| TII.DE | €155.18 | -4.80% | 141.1B | 32.74 | €4.74 | +3.21% |
| QCI.DE | €128.90 | -1.62% | 138.2B | 14.12 | €9.07 | +2.52% |
| AP2.DE | €156.66 | -0.63% | 124.3B | 21.55 | €7.19 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HY9H.F vs NVD.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while NVD.DE trades at €151.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check NVD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs NVD.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while NVD.F trades at €151.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check NVD.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs 1YD.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while 1YD.DE trades at €252.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 104.46. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs TSFA.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while TSFA.F trades at €204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check TSFA.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs AMD.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 240.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while AMD.DE trades at €151.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 122.61. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AMD.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ASME.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 234.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while ASME.DE trades at €604.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ASME.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs TII.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while TII.DE trades at €155.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check TII.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs QCI.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while QCI.DE trades at €128.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check QCI.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AP2.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while AP2.DE trades at €156.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AP2.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MTE.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while MTE.DE trades at €91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MTE.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs KLA.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while KLA.DE trades at €763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check KLA.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ANL.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while ANL.DE trades at €198.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ANL.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs LAR.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check LAR.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs INL.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while INL.DE trades at €16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to INL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check INL.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs INL.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while INL.F trades at €16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check INL.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs IFX.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while IFX.DE trades at €34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check IFX.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs VNX.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while VNX.DE trades at €156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check VNX.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MXI.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MXI.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SGM.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while SGM.DE trades at €22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SGM.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AWM.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while AWM.DE trades at €63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AWM.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs CR6.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CR6.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs 2QO.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs WAF1.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs RMB.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check RMB.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs AIX2.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while AIX2.F trades at €29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AIX2.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs AIXA.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while AIXA.DE trades at €14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs ELG.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while ELG.DE trades at €88.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check ELG.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SOH1.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while SOH1.F trades at €36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SOH1.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs WAF.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while WAF.DE trades at €37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check WAF.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SMHN.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 617.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while SMHN.DE trades at €31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs SIS.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while SIS.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is -33.41. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check SIS.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs CPIA.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while CPIA.F trades at €14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CPIA.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs CTNK.F Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while CTNK.F trades at €5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check CTNK.F's competition here
HY9H.F vs M5Z.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs DQW1.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MCP.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while MCP.DE trades at €63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MCP.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs MVIN.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is less volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
HY9H.F vs DLG.DE Comparison August 2025
HY9H.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HY9H.F stands at 110.5B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HY9H.F is priced at €163.00, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HY9H.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.94, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, HY9H.F's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HY9H.F is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HY9H.F.Check DLG.DE's competition here