Hexagon AB (publ)
Hexagon AB (publ) HXGBY Peers
See (HXGBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HXGBY | $10.02 | -0.67% | 27B | 24.43 | $0.41 | +1.55% |
| KYCCF | $418.72 | -0.99% | 101.6B | 36.35 | $11.52 | +0.54% |
| HNHPF | $10.09 | -2.04% | 70.1B | 12.30 | $0.82 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| HXGBF | $10.70 | +6.62% | 27.5B | 24.32 | $0.44 | +1.49% |
| MRAAY | $7.29 | -0.55% | 27.4B | 16.56 | $0.44 | +0.72% |
| MRAAF | $13.54 | -12.04% | 25.2B | 15.39 | $0.88 | +2.86% |
| TTDKF | $11.10 | +0.23% | 21.1B | 17.91 | $0.62 | +1.85% |
| TTDKY | $10.95 | +0.55% | 20.8B | 17.66 | $0.62 | +0.86% |
| VEMLY | $43.00 | +1.65% | 12.6B | 12.46 | $3.45 | +5.18% |
Stock Comparison
HXGBY vs KYCCF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while KYCCF trades at $418.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HNHPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HNHPF trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HNHAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HXGBF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HXGBF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MRAAY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MRAAY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MRAAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MRAAF trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TTDKF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TTDKF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TTDKY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TTDKY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs VEMLY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while VEMLY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BYDIY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BYDIY trades at $200.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BYDIF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BYDIF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SOTGY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SOTGY trades at $77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MNBEY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SNPTF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SNPTF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SHMZF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MNBEF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MNBEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs OMRNY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while OMRNY trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 45.53. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs IBIDF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AUOTY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AUOTY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HRSEF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HRSEF trades at $121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs KGBLY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while KGBLY trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HPHTY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HPHTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SEPJY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SEPJY trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SEPJF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SEPJF trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs VEMLF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HPHTF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HPHTF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HRIBF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HRIBF trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TOPCF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TOPCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 766.67. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs RNSHF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while RNSHF trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TYOYY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TYOYY trades at $66.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 148.08. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs APELF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs APELY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while APELY trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs FITGF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while FITGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs JELLF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while JELLF trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NPEGF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NPEGF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AMANF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AMANF trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs VAIAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while VAIAF trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NILRF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AITUF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AITUF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BCNAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BCNAF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs CODAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while CODAF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ASAAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ASAAF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs JNPKF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while JNPKF trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs JPAVF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while JPAVF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs CAZGF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 924.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while CAZGF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -116.67. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AUDGF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs VARXF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 633.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while VARXF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BCNAY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TRUHF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 530M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TRUHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs JNNDF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs JPDYY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs KRKNF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while KRKNF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HNMUF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 441.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HROEY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NNFTF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BMNR Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BMNR trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs KACPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while KACPF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs FUBAF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while FUBAF trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -115.40. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TTGPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 191.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TTGPF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SMOPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NPTSF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs CHAEF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs HUDLF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ENMPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ENMPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ENMPY Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ENMPY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs IACYF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while IACYF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs IKGPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SDIIF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SDIIF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SILLF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SILLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MPAD Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ACFN Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ACFN trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AATC Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AATC trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs GNCLF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while GNCLF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs FGRRF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ERMG Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NSCIF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NSCIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs IEHC Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while IEHC trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs YNVYF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs INRD Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs WELX Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while WELX trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs KESPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs AAIRF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while AAIRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs BNSOF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while BNSOF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SCND Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SCND trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ROBOF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ROBOF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs LCTC Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while LCTC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs ZTSTF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while ZTSTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs SIGL Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while SIGL trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TNLX Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TNLX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TRCK Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TRCK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs DPLS Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs MRRYF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs VPER Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs EQTL Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while EQTL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs NXOPF Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs LBAS Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, LBAS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while LBAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas LBAS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LBAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to LBAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TRCC Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TRCC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TRCC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TRCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is less volatile compared to TRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs TKOI Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, TKOI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while TKOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas TKOI's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKOI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to TKOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.
HXGBY vs GWSO Comparison
HXGBY plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXGBY stands at 27B. In comparison, GWSO has a market cap of 983.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HXGBY is priced at $10.02, while GWSO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXGBY currently has a P/E ratio of 24.43, whereas GWSO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, HXGBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWSO's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HXGBY is more volatile compared to GWSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXGBY.