Horizons S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
Horizons S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (HXCN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HXCN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HXCN.TO | CA$45.94 | +0.61% | 1.6B | 19.98 | CA$2.30 | N/A |
| BLK.NE | CA$29.38 | +0.44% | 234.2B | 26.95 | CA$1.09 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$92.66 | +0.68% | 152.8B | 231.65 | CA$0.40 | +0.51% |
| BAM.TO | CA$86.38 | +0.23% | 139.3B | 46.69 | CA$1.85 | +2.64% |
| VFV.TO | CA$155.37 | +0.88% | 23.5B | 27.22 | CA$5.71 | +0.98% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$95.80 | +0.86% | 19.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.88% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$35.10 | -0.48% | 16.3B | 3.73 | CA$9.41 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$41.42 | +0.49% | 14.6B | 20.45 | CA$2.03 | +2.72% |
| XEF.TO | CA$43.36 | +0.28% | 12.8B | 17.18 | CA$2.52 | +2.58% |
| VUN.TO | CA$116.78 | +0.82% | 12.1B | 26.40 | CA$4.42 | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
HXCN.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 234.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while BLK.NE trades at CA$29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
HXCN.TO vs BN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while BN.TO trades at CA$92.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 231.65. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 139.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while BAM.TO trades at CA$86.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 46.69. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VFV.TO trades at CA$155.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XIU.TO trades at CA$41.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XEF.TO trades at CA$43.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VUN.TO trades at CA$116.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while IGM.TO trades at CA$46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VCN.TO trades at CA$56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XUS.TO trades at CA$54.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XIC.TO trades at CA$43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XSP.TO trades at CA$65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CEF.TO trades at CA$42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$113.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CASH.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VIU.TO trades at CA$39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZMMK.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VSP.TO trades at CA$102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while HXS.TO trades at CA$90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while HXT.TO trades at CA$72.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while QUU.TO trades at CA$253.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VDY.TO trades at CA$53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XUU.TO trades at CA$64.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$87.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while TPU.TO trades at CA$49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XAW.TO trades at CA$47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XBB.TO trades at CA$27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs SII.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while SII.TO trades at CA$97.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VXC.TO trades at CA$68.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XEC.TO trades at CA$32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$160.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VCE.TO trades at CA$60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$56.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while QCN.TO trades at CA$167.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VGG.TO trades at CA$97.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while QQC.TO trades at CA$37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check QQC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XEI.TO trades at CA$29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 66.37. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CMR.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XIN.TO trades at CA$39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XFN.TO trades at CA$66.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CACB.TO trades at CA$19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CYB.TO trades at CA$82.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XFH.TO trades at CA$35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check CBIL.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while UNC.TO trades at CA$13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZGB.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZPR.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while EQL.TO trades at CA$39.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XWD.TO trades at CA$102.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO and XWD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.68).Check XWD.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$65.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZUQ.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while VUS.TO trades at CA$109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check VUS.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZDV.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while QDX.TO trades at CA$135.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check QDX.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs BND.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check BND.TO's competition here
HXCN.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison July 2025
HXCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HXCN.TO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HXCN.TO is priced at CA$45.94, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HXCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.98, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HXCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HXCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HXCN.TO.Check ZDM.TO's competition here