Husqvarna AB (publ)
Husqvarna AB (publ) (HUSQF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUSQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUSQF | $5.56 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 24.17 | $0.23 | +4.32% |
| TTNDF | $12.65 | +0.01% | 23.1B | 20.74 | $0.61 | +2.29% |
| TTNDY | $60.02 | +0.33% | 22.1B | 19.66 | $3.05 | +2.42% |
| SKFRY | $23.03 | -1.54% | 10.8B | 19.10 | $1.22 | +3.32% |
| SKUFF | $24.45 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 20.04 | $1.22 | +3.19% |
| MKTAY | $32.31 | +3.79% | 8.7B | 16.15 | $1.99 | +1.53% |
| MKEWF | $31.87 | +0.00% | 8.5B | 16.86 | $1.89 | +2.32% |
| MSSMY | $7.24 | +1.12% | 4.1B | 16.45 | $0.44 | +1.05% |
| HUQVF | $6.53 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 29.69 | $0.22 | +3.67% |
| MSUXF | $13.08 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 14.69 | $0.89 | +2.05% |
Stock Comparison
HUSQF vs TTNDF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTNDF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while TTNDF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas TTNDF's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTNDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and TTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTNDF's competition here
HUSQF vs TTNDY Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TTNDY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while TTNDY trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas TTNDY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTNDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to TTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check TTNDY's competition here
HUSQF vs SKFRY Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SKFRY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while SKFRY trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas SKFRY's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKFRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to SKFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check SKFRY's competition here
HUSQF vs SKUFF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SKUFF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while SKUFF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas SKUFF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKUFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and SKUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKUFF's competition here
HUSQF vs MKTAY Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MKTAY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while MKTAY trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas MKTAY's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to MKTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check MKTAY's competition here
HUSQF vs MKEWF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MKEWF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while MKEWF trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas MKEWF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and MKEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKEWF's competition here
HUSQF vs MSSMY Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MSSMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while MSSMY trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas MSSMY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to MSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check MSSMY's competition here
HUSQF vs HUQVF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HUQVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while HUQVF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas HUQVF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUQVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to HUQVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check HUQVF's competition here
HUSQF vs MSUXF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MSUXF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while MSUXF trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas MSUXF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSUXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to MSUXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check MSUXF's competition here
HUSQF vs HSQVY Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HSQVY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while HSQVY trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas HSQVY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSQVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and HSQVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSQVY's competition here
HUSQF vs MRSKF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MRSKF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while MRSKF trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas MRSKF's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRSKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and MRSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRSKF's competition here
HUSQF vs OSGCF Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OSGCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while OSGCF trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas OSGCF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSGCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to OSGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check OSGCF's competition here
HUSQF vs QEPC Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QEPC has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while QEPC trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas QEPC's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QEPC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and QEPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QEPC's competition here
HUSQF vs SCXLB Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCXLB has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while SCXLB trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas SCXLB's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCXLB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to SCXLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check SCXLB's competition here
HUSQF vs DMFG Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DMFG has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while DMFG trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas DMFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to DMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check DMFG's competition here
HUSQF vs FSCR Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSCR has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while FSCR trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas FSCR's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF and FSCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSCR's competition here
HUSQF vs PERT Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PERT has a market cap of 27.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while PERT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas PERT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PERT's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to PERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check PERT's competition here
HUSQF vs PRTR Comparison August 2025
HUSQF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUSQF stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRTR has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HUSQF is priced at $5.56, while PRTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUSQF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.17, whereas PRTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSQF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRTR's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSQF is less volatile compared to PRTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSQF.Check PRTR's competition here