Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HTZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTZ | $4.41 | -5.88% | 1.5B | -1.40 | -$3.34 | N/A |
| URI | $884.00 | -0.56% | 57.9B | 23.54 | $38.64 | +0.81% |
| FTAI | $285.89 | -1.07% | 29.7B | 66.30 | $4.37 | +0.43% |
| AER | $148.23 | -2.05% | 25.7B | 7.10 | $21.30 | +0.71% |
| CTOS-WT | $0.11 | -7.93% | 18B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UHAL | $50.96 | -1.09% | 9.8B | 110.19 | $0.47 | N/A |
| UHAL-B | $47.36 | -0.96% | 9.4B | 101.77 | $0.47 | N/A |
| R | $218.96 | -0.17% | 8.8B | 18.69 | $11.98 | +1.58% |
| EQPT | $28.93 | -14.27% | 7.9B | -631.00 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| AL | $64.91 | +0.18% | 7.3B | 6.99 | $9.29 | +1.36% |
Stock Comparison
HTZ vs URI Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, URI has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while URI trades at $884.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas URI's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to URI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to URI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check URI's competition here
HTZ vs FTAI Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAI trades at $285.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAI's P/E ratio is 66.30. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAI's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAI's competition here
HTZ vs AER Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AER has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while AER trades at $148.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AER's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to AER's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to AER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check AER's competition here
HTZ vs CTOS-WT Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS-WT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while CTOS-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CTOS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to CTOS-WT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to CTOS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check CTOS-WT's competition here
HTZ vs UHAL Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while UHAL trades at $50.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UHAL's P/E ratio is 110.19. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to UHAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to UHAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check UHAL's competition here
HTZ vs UHAL-B Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL-B has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while UHAL-B trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UHAL-B's P/E ratio is 101.77. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to UHAL-B's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to UHAL-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check UHAL-B's competition here
HTZ vs R Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, R has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while R trades at $218.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas R's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to R's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to R. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check R's competition here
HTZ vs EQPT Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQPT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while EQPT trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EQPT's P/E ratio is -631.00. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to EQPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to EQPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check EQPT's competition here
HTZ vs AL Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while AL trades at $64.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AL's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to AL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to AL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check AL's competition here
HTZ vs GATX Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GATX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while GATX trades at $195.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GATX's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to GATX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to GATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check GATX's competition here
HTZ vs AL-PA Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while AL-PA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AL-PA's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to AL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to AL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check AL-PA's competition here
HTZ vs HRI Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HRI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while HRI trades at $147.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HRI's P/E ratio is -64.76. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to HRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to HRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check HRI's competition here
HTZ vs PONY Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PONY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while PONY trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PONY's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to PONY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to PONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check PONY's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN's competition here
HTZ vs WSC Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WSC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while WSC trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WSC's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to WSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to WSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check WSC's competition here
HTZ vs HEES Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEES has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while HEES trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HEES's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to HEES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to HEES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check HEES's competition here
HTZ vs CAR Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while CAR trades at $87.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CAR's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to CAR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to CAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check CAR's competition here
HTZ vs FTAIM Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAIM trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAIM's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAIM's competition here
HTZ vs MGRC Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MGRC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while MGRC trades at $111.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MGRC's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to MGRC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to MGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check MGRC's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN-PA Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN-PA trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN-PA's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN-PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN-PA's competition here
HTZ vs FTAIN Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAIN trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAIN's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAIN's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAIN's competition here
HTZ vs FTAIO Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAIO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAIO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAIO's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAIO's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN-PB Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN-PB trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN-PB's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN-PB's competition here
HTZ vs FTAIP Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAIP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAIP's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAIP's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAIP's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN-PC Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN-PC trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN-PC's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN-PC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN-PC's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN-PD Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN-PD trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN-PD's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN-PD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN-PD's competition here
HTZ vs TRTN-PE Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TRTN-PE trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TRTN-PE's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TRTN-PE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TRTN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TRTN-PE's competition here
HTZ vs TGH Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TGH trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TGH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TGH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TGH's competition here
HTZ vs CTOS Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while CTOS trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CTOS's P/E ratio is -68.55. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to CTOS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to CTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check CTOS's competition here
HTZ vs PRG Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while PRG trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check PRG's competition here
HTZ vs RCII Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RCII has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while RCII trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas RCII's P/E ratio is 81.15. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to RCII's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to RCII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check RCII's competition here
HTZ vs WLFC Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while WLFC trades at $197.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WLFC's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to WLFC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to WLFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check WLFC's competition here
HTZ vs VSTS Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSTS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while VSTS trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VSTS's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to VSTS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to VSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check VSTS's competition here
HTZ vs TGH-PA Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TGH-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TGH-PA's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TGH-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TGH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TGH-PA's competition here
HTZ vs TGH-PB Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TGH-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TGH-PB's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TGH-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TGH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TGH-PB's competition here
HTZ vs ALTG-PA Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG-PA has a market cap of 808.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while ALTG-PA trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ALTG-PA's P/E ratio is -41.10. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to ALTG-PA's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to ALTG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check ALTG-PA's competition here
HTZ vs HTZWW Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTZWW has a market cap of 746.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while HTZWW trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HTZWW's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to HTZWW's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to HTZWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check HTZWW's competition here
HTZ vs AAN Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAN has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while AAN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas AAN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to AAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to AAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check AAN's competition here
HTZ vs ALTG Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG has a market cap of 227.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while ALTG trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ALTG's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to ALTG's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to ALTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check ALTG's competition here
HTZ vs MTMT Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTMT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while MTMT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MTMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to MTMT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to MTMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check MTMT's competition here
HTZ vs MPU Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while MPU trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to MPU's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to MPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check MPU's competition here
HTZ vs TLIH Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TLIH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while TLIH trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas TLIH's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to TLIH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to TLIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check TLIH's competition here
HTZ vs MWG Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MWG has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while MWG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas MWG's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to MWG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to MWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check MWG's competition here
HTZ vs BRDS Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRDS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while BRDS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BRDS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to BRDS's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to BRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check BRDS's competition here
HTZ vs HYRE Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HYRE has a market cap of 486.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while HYRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to HYRE's ROE of -46.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to HYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check HYRE's competition here
HTZ vs ZCAR Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCAR has a market cap of 448.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while ZCAR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ZCAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to ZCAR's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to ZCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check ZCAR's competition here
HTZ vs ZCARW Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCARW has a market cap of 73.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while ZCARW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ZCARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to ZCARW's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to ZCARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check ZCARW's competition here
HTZ vs FPAY Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FPAY has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FPAY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FPAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FPAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FPAY's competition here
HTZ vs FTAI-PB Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAI-PB trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAI-PB's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAI-PB's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAI-PB's competition here
HTZ vs ACY Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while ACY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ACY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to ACY's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is less volatile compared to ACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check ACY's competition here
HTZ vs UHALB Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHALB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while UHALB trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas UHALB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to UHALB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to UHALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check UHALB's competition here
HTZ vs FTAI-PC Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAI-PC trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAI-PC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAI-PC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAI-PC's competition here
HTZ vs GFNCP Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFNCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while GFNCP trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas GFNCP's P/E ratio is 146.89. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to GFNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to GFNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check GFNCP's competition here
HTZ vs FTAI-PA Comparison February 2026
HTZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTZ stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTZ is priced at $4.41, while FTAI-PA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTZ currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FTAI-PA's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, HTZ's ROE is +4.44%, compared to FTAI-PA's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTZ is more volatile compared to FTAI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTZ.Check FTAI-PA's competition here