Heat Biologics, Inc.
Heat Biologics, Inc. HTBX Peers
See (HTBX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTBX | $2.38 | +0.42% | 61.1M | -2.07 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| VRTX | $476.95 | +1.45% | 122.5B | -125.18 | -$3.81 | N/A |
| REGN | $572.39 | +2.04% | 60.8B | 14.55 | $39.33 | +0.31% |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $325.64 | +0.11% | 42.5B | -153.60 | -$2.12 | N/A |
| ARGX | $575.42 | +0.73% | 35.2B | 35.04 | $16.42 | N/A |
| BNTX | $114.60 | +2.84% | 27.5B | -30.89 | -$3.71 | N/A |
| SMMT | $28.01 | +5.54% | 20.8B | -82.38 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| RPRX | $36.01 | -0.25% | 20.2B | 14.70 | $2.45 | +2.39% |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HTBX vs VRTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while VRTX trades at $476.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -125.18. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs REGN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while REGN trades at $572.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs SGEN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ALNY Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ALNY trades at $325.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -153.60. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ARGX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ARGX trades at $575.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BNTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BNTX trades at $114.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs SMMT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while SMMT trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -82.38. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RPRX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RPRX trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BGNE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs DNA-WT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs GMAB Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while GMAB trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs UTHR Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while UTHR trades at $305.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs INCY Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while INCY trades at $70.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 353.45. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MRNA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MRNA trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs KRTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs EXEL Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while EXEL trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BMRN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BMRN trades at $59.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ASND Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ASND trades at $170.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RXDX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs VRNA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while VRNA trades at $104.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -52.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BBIO Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BBIO trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -12.97. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IMGN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs TECH Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while TECH trades at $55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 66.64. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BPMC Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CERE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ROIVW Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ROIV Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ROIV trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CORT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CORT trades at $68.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 59.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs HALO Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while HALO trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs JAZZ Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while JAZZ trades at $117.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RVMD Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RVMD trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MDGL Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MDGL trades at $306.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IONS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IONS trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RETA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs AMRN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while AMRN trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs TGTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while TGTX trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 150.40. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CRSP Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CRSP trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs NUVL Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while NUVL trades at $80.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RYTM Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RYTM trades at $87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -31.36. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ABCM Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ISEE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs AXSM Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while AXSM trades at $106.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs TLX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while TLX trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 162.00. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MRUS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MRUS trades at $64.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs PCVX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while PCVX trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs SLNO Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while SLNO trades at $87.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -18.45. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CYTK Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CYTK trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ALKS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ALKS trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ALPN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs KRYS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while KRYS trades at $153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ABVX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ABVX trades at $68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -19.98. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MTSR Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MTSR trades at $39.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs OPT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs AKRO Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while AKRO trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ZLAB Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ZLAB trades at $37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MRTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ADMA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ADMA trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RNA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RNA trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs LEGN Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while LEGN trades at $44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -37.56. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ACAD Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ACAD trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ACLX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ACLX trades at $69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -23.37. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs SRRK Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while SRRK trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs VKTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while VKTX trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -28.79. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RYZB Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs PTCT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while PTCT trades at $47.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CBAY Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs SWTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MLTX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MLTX trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -24.23. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs PTGX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while PTGX trades at $54.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 69.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs AAPG Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while AAPG trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -51.08. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs KYMR Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while KYMR trades at $46.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IMVT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IMVT trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CRNX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CRNX trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MORF Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MOR Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs NAMSW Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while NAMSW trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RXRX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RXRX trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs KDNY Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs NAMS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while NAMS trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs RARE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while RARE trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IBRX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IBRX trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CPRX Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CPRX trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs LGND Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while LGND trades at $136.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MIRM Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MIRM trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs MYOV Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs APLS Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while APLS trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs APGE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while APGE trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs XENE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while XENE trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs PRVB Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IMRA Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IMRA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IMRA trades at $46.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IMRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IMRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to IMRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs AGIO Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while AGIO trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs LBPH Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs DICE Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs BEAM Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BEAM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while BEAM trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas BEAM's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BEAM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to BEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs ARWR Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while ARWR trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs GLPG Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, GLPG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while GLPG trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas GLPG's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GLPG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to GLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs CALT Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is less volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs HRMY Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, HRMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while HRMY trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas HRMY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to HRMY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to HRMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.
HTBX vs IRON Comparison
HTBX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTBX stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IRON has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTBX is priced at $2.38, while IRON trades at $60.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTBX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.07, whereas IRON's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, HTBX's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IRON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HTBX is more volatile compared to IRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTBX.