Hersha Hospitality Trust
Hersha Hospitality Trust HT Peers
See (HT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HT | $9.99 | -0.10% | 482.85M | 66.60 | $0.15 | N/A |
| HST | $15.42 | -0.90% | 10.70B | 16.06 | $0.96 | +5.85% |
| RHP | $99.24 | +0.23% | 5.95B | 21.07 | $4.71 | +4.55% |
| DRH-PA | $25.13 | -0.08% | 5.18B | -226.40 | -$0.11 | +4.78% |
| SHO-PH | $21.31 | -0.35% | 4.28B | 57.59 | $0.37 | +4.07% |
| SHO-PI | $20.04 | -0.05% | 4.03B | 54.16 | $0.37 | +4.07% |
| APLE | $12.05 | -1.27% | 2.87B | 15.06 | $0.80 | +8.40% |
| PK | $10.80 | -0.74% | 2.16B | 18.31 | $0.59 | +12.99% |
| PEB-PG | $18.10 | -0.66% | 2.15B | -10.84 | -$1.67 | +0.40% |
| SHO | $10.54 | +1.84% | 2.12B | 75.29 | $0.14 | +4.07% |
Stock Comparison
HT vs HST Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while HST trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs RHP Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while RHP trades at $99.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs DRH-PA Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while DRH-PA trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -226.40. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SHO-PH Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SHO-PH trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 57.59. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SHO-PI Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SHO-PI trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs APLE Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while APLE trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PK Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PK trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PK's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PEB-PG Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PEB-PG trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SHO Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SHO trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 75.29. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PEB-PH Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PEB-PH trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs INN-PF Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while INN-PF trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs DRH Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while DRH trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PEB-PF Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PEB-PF trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs XHR Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while XHR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PEB-PE Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PEB-PE trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs PEB Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while PEB trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -22.64. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs RLJ-PA Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs RLJ Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while RLJ trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs CLDT-PA Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.55. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs HT-PE Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs HT-PD Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs HT-PC Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.22M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs INN-PE Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 565.50M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while INN-PE trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -32.59. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs INN Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 488.72M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while INN trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas INN's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SVC Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 368.27M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SVC trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs CLDT Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 351.95M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while CLDT trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 119.75. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs BHR-PD Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 144.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while BHR-PD trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -69.16. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs BHR Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 142.81M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while BHR trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs BHR-PB Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 141.59M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while BHR-PB trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -46.89. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT-PH Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 40.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT-PH trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT-PI Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 37.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT-PI trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT-PF Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 37.09M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT-PF trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT-PD Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 36.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT-PD trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT-PG Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 36.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT-PG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs AHT Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 36.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while AHT trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SOHOO Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 32.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SOHOO trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SOHON Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SOHON trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHON's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SOHOB Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 31.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SOHOB trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs IHT Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 21.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while IHT trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is more volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.
HT vs SOHO Comparison
HT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HT stands at 482.85M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 15.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HT is priced at $9.99, while SOHO trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HT currently has a P/E ratio of 66.60, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, HT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HT is less volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HT.