Harte Gold Corp.
Harte Gold Corp. HRT.TO Peers
See (HRT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRT.TO | CA$0.01 | N/A | 0 | 0.77 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$79.32 | -0.49% | 88.3B | 13.20 | CA$6.01 | +1.76% |
| AEM.TO | CA$166.76 | -0.73% | 84.3B | 25.93 | CA$6.43 | +0.98% |
| WPM.TO | CA$123.15 | -1.30% | 55.9B | 66.21 | CA$1.86 | +0.74% |
| ABX.TO | CA$28.77 | -0.48% | 49.5B | 15.98 | CA$1.80 | +1.94% |
| FNV.TO | CA$230.23 | -0.09% | 44.4B | 52.44 | CA$4.39 | +0.90% |
| K.TO | CA$21.00 | -1.32% | 25.8B | 15.67 | CA$1.34 | +0.79% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$72.22 | -1.83% | 17.4B | 23.76 | CA$3.04 | +2.20% |
| AGI.TO | CA$36.54 | -0.19% | 15.4B | 42.99 | CA$0.85 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
HRT.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NGT.TO trades at CA$79.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AEM.TO trades at CA$166.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while WPM.TO trades at CA$123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 66.21. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ABX.TO trades at CA$28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while FNV.TO trades at CA$230.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs K.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while K.TO trades at CA$21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while LUG.TO trades at CA$72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AGI.TO trades at CA$36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while EDV.TO trades at CA$41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -71.90. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while OR.TO trades at CA$35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 153.78. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while OLA.TO trades at CA$15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while OGC.TO trades at CA$6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while TXG.TO trades at CA$45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while KNT.TO trades at CA$15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 89.64. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while DPM.TO trades at CA$20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while WDO.TO trades at CA$19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ORA.TO trades at CA$37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NG.TO trades at CA$5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -31.16. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SEA.TO trades at CA$20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -134.87. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.56. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CNL.TO trades at CA$13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 788.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while IAU.TO trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 755.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 733M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 658.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 481.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 479.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 471.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while MND.TO trades at CA$4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -31.23. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -41.33. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs G.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while G.TO trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs WG.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.
HRT.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
HRT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRT.TO stands at 0. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HRT.TO is priced at CA$0.01, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.77, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, HRT.TO's ROE is +1.78%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HRT.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRT.TO.