Hera S.p.A.
Hera S.p.A. (HRASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HRASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRASF | $3.64 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 9.34 | $0.39 | +4.78% |
| IBDSF | $18.98 | -2.37% | 123B | 21.82 | $0.87 | +3.02% |
| IBDRY | $76.07 | -2.19% | 122.4B | 21.84 | $3.48 | +3.71% |
| ENLAY | $9.30 | -1.48% | 94.6B | 13.30 | $0.70 | +5.51% |
| ESOCF | $9.20 | -3.84% | 93.4B | 13.14 | $0.70 | +5.44% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +1.81% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +1.81% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | +0.00% | 53.6B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | +0.00% | 53.1B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| ENGIY | $21.30 | -3.51% | 51.8B | 9.02 | $2.36 | +7.62% |
Stock Comparison
HRASF vs IBDSF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while IBDSF trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check IBDSF's competition here
HRASF vs IBDRY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while IBDRY trades at $76.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check IBDRY's competition here
HRASF vs ENLAY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ENLAY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ENLAY's competition here
HRASF vs ESOCF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ESOCF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ESOCF's competition here
HRASF vs PPWLM Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check PPWLM's competition here
HRASF vs PPWLO Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check PPWLO's competition here
HRASF vs ECIFF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ECIFF's competition here
HRASF vs ECIFY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ECIFY's competition here
HRASF vs ENGIY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ENGIY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ENGIY's competition here
HRASF vs ENGQF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ENGQF trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ENGQF's competition here
HRASF vs ENAKF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ENAKF trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ENAKF's competition here
HRASF vs EONGY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while EONGY trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check EONGY's competition here
HRASF vs RWNFF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while RWNFF trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check RWNFF's competition here
HRASF vs RWEOY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while RWEOY trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check RWEOY's competition here
HRASF vs SSEZY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while SSEZY trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check SSEZY's competition here
HRASF vs SSEZF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while SSEZF trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check SSEZF's competition here
HRASF vs EDPFY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while EDPFY trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check EDPFY's competition here
HRASF vs ELCPF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ELCPF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ELCPF's competition here
HRASF vs CHUEF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CHUEF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CHUEF's competition here
HRASF vs AEMMF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check AEMMF's competition here
HRASF vs AEMMY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while AEMMY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check AEMMY's competition here
HRASF vs CDUUF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CDUUF's competition here
HRASF vs CUTLF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CUTLF trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CUTLF's competition here
HRASF vs CNUTF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CNUTF's competition here
HRASF vs CNAUF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CNAUF's competition here
HRASF vs CDUTF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CDUTF's competition here
HRASF vs CDUAF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CDUAF trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CDUAF's competition here
HRASF vs ACEJF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ACEJF's competition here
HRASF vs ACLTF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ACLTF trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ACLTF's competition here
HRASF vs ACLLF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ACLLF trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ACLLF's competition here
HRASF vs IRDEF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while IRDEF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check IRDEF's competition here
HRASF vs CSGEF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CSGEF's competition here
HRASF vs VETTF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while VETTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check VETTF's competition here
HRASF vs IRDEY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check IRDEY's competition here
HRASF vs GLVNF Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check GLVNF's competition here
HRASF vs ARAO Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check ARAO's competition here
HRASF vs PBEV Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check PBEV's competition here
HRASF vs CMNR Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check CMNR's competition here
HRASF vs EVNVY Comparison August 2025
HRASF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HRASF stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HRASF is priced at $3.64, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HRASF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.34, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, HRASF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HRASF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HRASF.Check EVNVY's competition here