Hindustan Foods Limited
Hindustan Foods Limited (HNDFDS.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HNDFDS.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNDFDS.BO | ₹484.55 | +0.04% | 57.9B | 42.24 | ₹11.47 | N/A |
| NESTLEIND.NS | ₹1,323.40 | +0.26% | 2.6T | 78.31 | ₹16.90 | +0.91% |
| NESTLEIND.BO | ₹1,322.60 | +0.19% | 2.6T | 78.12 | ₹16.93 | +0.91% |
| BRITANNIA.NS | ₹6,158.00 | -0.07% | 1.5T | 61.57 | ₹100.02 | +1.22% |
| BRITANNIA.BO | ₹6,151.55 | -0.20% | 1.5T | 63.82 | ₹96.39 | +1.22% |
| TATACONSUM.NS | ₹1,172.30 | -0.48% | 1.2T | 78.78 | ₹14.88 | +0.70% |
| TATACONSUM.BO | ₹1,172.15 | -0.56% | 1.2T | 78.77 | ₹14.88 | +0.70% |
| PATANJALI.NS | ₹518.75 | -0.70% | 564.2B | 34.26 | ₹15.14 | +0.85% |
| PATANJALI.BO | ₹518.60 | -0.95% | 564.1B | 34.16 | ₹15.18 | +0.85% |
| AWL.BO | ₹190.75 | -0.44% | 247.1B | 26.20 | ₹7.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HNDFDS.BO vs NESTLEIND.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while NESTLEIND.NS trades at ₹1,323.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas NESTLEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 78.31. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.NS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to NESTLEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs NESTLEIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while NESTLEIND.BO trades at ₹1,322.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas NESTLEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 78.12. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.BO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to NESTLEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BRITANNIA.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BRITANNIA.NS trades at ₹6,158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BRITANNIA.NS's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.NS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BRITANNIA.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BRITANNIA.BO trades at ₹6,151.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BRITANNIA.BO's P/E ratio is 63.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.BO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BRITANNIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACONSUM.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TATACONSUM.NS trades at ₹1,172.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TATACONSUM.NS's P/E ratio is 78.78. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACONSUM.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TATACONSUM.BO trades at ₹1,172.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TATACONSUM.BO's P/E ratio is 78.77. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PATANJALI.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PATANJALI.NS has a market cap of 564.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while PATANJALI.NS trades at ₹518.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas PATANJALI.NS's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PATANJALI.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PATANJALI.BO has a market cap of 564.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while PATANJALI.BO trades at ₹518.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas PATANJALI.BO's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AWL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AWL.BO has a market cap of 247.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while AWL.BO trades at ₹190.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas AWL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AWL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AWL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HATSUN.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HATSUN.BO has a market cap of 199.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HATSUN.BO trades at ₹895.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HATSUN.BO's P/E ratio is 57.24. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HATSUN.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HATSUN.NS has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HATSUN.NS trades at ₹893.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HATSUN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.08. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AVANTIFEED.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.NS has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while AVANTIFEED.NS trades at ₹1,355.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas AVANTIFEED.NS's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AVANTIFEED.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.BO has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while AVANTIFEED.BO trades at ₹1,355.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas AVANTIFEED.BO's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BIKAJI.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BIKAJI.NS has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BIKAJI.NS trades at ₹624.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BIKAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 63.68. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BIKAJI.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BIKAJI.BO has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BIKAJI.BO trades at ₹623.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BIKAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 63.35. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs LTFOODS.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LTFOODS.NS has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while LTFOODS.NS trades at ₹408.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas LTFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs LTFOODS.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LTFOODS.BO has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while LTFOODS.BO trades at ₹408.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas LTFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CCL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CCL.BO has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while CCL.BO trades at ₹1,036.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas CCL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CCL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CCL.NS has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while CCL.NS trades at ₹1,036.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas CCL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BBTC.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BBTC.NS has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BBTC.NS trades at ₹1,764.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BBTC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BBTC.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BBTC.BO has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BBTC.BO trades at ₹1,761.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BBTC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MANORAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MANORAMA.NS has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MANORAMA.NS trades at ₹1,432.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MANORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MANORAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MANORAMA.BO trades at ₹1,432.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ORKLAINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ORKLAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ORKLAINDIA.NS trades at ₹601.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ORKLAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ORKLAINDIA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRBL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KRBL.NS has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while KRBL.NS trades at ₹350.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas KRBL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRBL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KRBL.BO has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while KRBL.BO trades at ₹350.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas KRBL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BECTORFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.BO has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BECTORFOOD.BO trades at ₹216.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BECTORFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 47.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BECTORFOOD.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.NS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BECTORFOOD.NS trades at ₹216.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BECTORFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GAEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GAEL.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GAEL.NS trades at ₹144.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GAEL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GAEL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GAEL.BO has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GAEL.BO trades at ₹144.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GAEL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DAAWAT.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DAAWAT.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DAAWAT.NS trades at ₹189.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DAAWAT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAAWAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DAAWAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DAAWAT.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACOFFEE.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TATACOFFEE.BO trades at ₹344.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TATACOFFEE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOFFEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACOFFEE.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACOFFEE.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TATACOFFEE.NS trades at ₹334.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TATACOFFEE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HNDFDS.BO has daily volatility of 1.60 and TATACOFFEE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TATACOFFEE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HNDFDS.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HNDFDS.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HNDFDS.NS trades at ₹485.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HNDFDS.NS's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HNDFDS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HNDFDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HNDFDS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOPAL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GOPAL.NS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GOPAL.NS trades at ₹306.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GOPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 902.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOPAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOPAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TASTYBIT.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TASTYBIT.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TASTYBIT.BO trades at ₹14,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TASTYBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBIT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBIT.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs VADILALIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, VADILALIND.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while VADILALIND.BO trades at ₹4,886.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas VADILALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to VADILALIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs VADILALIND.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, VADILALIND.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while VADILALIND.NS trades at ₹4,882.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas VADILALIND.NS's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to VADILALIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GRMOVER.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GRMOVER.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GRMOVER.BO trades at ₹164.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GRMOVER.BO's P/E ratio is 51.81. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HERITGFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HERITGFOOD.BO trades at ₹326.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HERITGFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GRMOVER.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GRMOVER.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GRMOVER.NS trades at ₹164.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GRMOVER.NS's P/E ratio is 51.69. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HERITGFOOD.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HERITGFOOD.NS trades at ₹324.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HERITGFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ATFL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ATFL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ATFL.NS trades at ₹785.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ATFL.NS's P/E ratio is 344.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ATFL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ATFL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ATFL.BO trades at ₹784.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ATFL.BO's P/E ratio is 342.53. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BNAGROCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BNAGROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while BNAGROCHEM.BO trades at ₹268.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas BNAGROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BNAGROCHEM.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DIAMONDYD.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DIAMONDYD.NS trades at ₹1,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DIAMONDYD.NS's P/E ratio is -766.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DIAMONDYD.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DIAMONDYD.BO trades at ₹1,068.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DIAMONDYD.BO's P/E ratio is -763.25. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKULAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GOKULAGRO.BO trades at ₹170.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GOKULAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKULAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GOKULAGRO.NS trades at ₹169.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GOKULAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ZYDUSWELL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ZYDUSWELL.NS trades at ₹393.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ZYDUSWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 60.48. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ZYDUSWELL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ZYDUSWELL.BO trades at ₹393.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ZYDUSWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SUNDROP.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SUNDROP.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SUNDROP.BO trades at ₹657.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SUNDROP.BO's P/E ratio is -16.14. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SUNDROP.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SUNDROP.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SUNDROP.NS trades at ₹650.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SUNDROP.NS's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DFMFOODS.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DFMFOODS.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DFMFOODS.NS trades at ₹461.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DFMFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFMFOODS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to DFMFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DFMFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PARAGMILK.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while PARAGMILK.NS trades at ₹193.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas PARAGMILK.NS's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PARAGMILK.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while PARAGMILK.BO trades at ₹193.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas PARAGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ADFFOODS.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ADFFOODS.NS trades at ₹204.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ADFFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ADFFOODS.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ADFFOODS.BO trades at ₹204.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ADFFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TASTYBITE.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TASTYBITE.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while TASTYBITE.NS trades at ₹7,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas TASTYBITE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.66. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBITE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CLSEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CLSEL.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while CLSEL.NS trades at ₹276.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas CLSEL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CLSEL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CLSEL.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while CLSEL.BO trades at ₹276.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas CLSEL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HMAAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HMAAGRO.NS trades at ₹26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HMAAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HMAAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while HMAAGRO.BO trades at ₹26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas HMAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SKMEGGPROD.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SKMEGGPROD.BO trades at ₹168.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SKMEGGPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SKMEGGPROD.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SKMEGGPROD.NS trades at ₹168.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SKMEGGPROD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs REGAAL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, REGAAL.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while REGAAL.NS trades at ₹68.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas REGAAL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGAAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to REGAAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check REGAAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MUKKA.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MUKKA.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MUKKA.NS trades at ₹22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MUKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUKKA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MUKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MUKKA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRISHIVAL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KRISHIVAL.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while KRISHIVAL.NS trades at ₹310.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas KRISHIVAL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRISHIVAL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRISHIVAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRISHIVAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs EIFFL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, EIFFL.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while EIFFL.NS trades at ₹241.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas EIFFL.NS's P/E ratio is 107.01. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIFFL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to EIFFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check EIFFL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SARVESHWAR.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SARVESHWAR.BO trades at ₹3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SARVESHWAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SARVESHWAR.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SARVESHWAR.NS trades at ₹3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SARVESHWAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs FOODSIN.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FOODSIN.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while FOODSIN.BO trades at ₹59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas FOODSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs FOODSIN.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FOODSIN.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while FOODSIN.NS trades at ₹59.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas FOODSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKUL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GOKUL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GOKUL.BO trades at ₹41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GOKUL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKUL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GOKUL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GOKUL.NS trades at ₹41.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GOKUL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRITINUT.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KRITINUT.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while KRITINUT.NS trades at ₹68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas KRITINUT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRITINUT.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KRITINUT.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while KRITINUT.BO trades at ₹68.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas KRITINUT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SCPL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SCPL.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SCPL.BO trades at ₹326.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SCPL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SCPL.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while SCPL.NS trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas SCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs COASTCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, COASTCORP.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while COASTCORP.NS trades at ₹47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas COASTCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs JAYSHREETEA.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, JAYSHREETEA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while JAYSHREETEA.BO trades at ₹107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas JAYSHREETEA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check JAYSHREETEA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs COASTCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, COASTCORP.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while COASTCORP.BO trades at ₹46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas COASTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MEGASTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MEGASTAR.BO trades at ₹233.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MEGASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MEGASTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MEGASTAR.NS trades at ₹224.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MEGASTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs WATERBASE.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, WATERBASE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while WATERBASE.BO trades at ₹56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas WATERBASE.BO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs WATERBASE.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, WATERBASE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while WATERBASE.NS trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas WATERBASE.NS's P/E ratio is -53.19. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MKPL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MKPL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MKPL.BO trades at ₹5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MKPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MKPL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MKPL.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while MKPL.NS trades at ₹5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas MKPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CHATHA.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CHATHA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while CHATHA.BO trades at ₹70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas CHATHA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHATHA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CHATHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CHATHA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs UMANGDAIR.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, UMANGDAIR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while UMANGDAIR.BO trades at ₹76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas UMANGDAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMANGDAIR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to UMANGDAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check UMANGDAIR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DHUNTEAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DHUNTEAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DHUNTEAIND.BO trades at ₹221.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DHUNTEAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DHUNTEAIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DTIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DTIL.BO trades at ₹138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DTIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DTIL.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while DTIL.NS trades at ₹138.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas DTIL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GANGESSECU.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GANGESSECU.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GANGESSECU.BO trades at ₹133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GANGESSECU.BO's P/E ratio is 79.40. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GANGESSECU.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to GANGESSECU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GANGESSECU.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GANGESSECU.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GANGESSECU.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GANGESSECU.NS trades at ₹129.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GANGESSECU.NS's P/E ratio is 77.36. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GANGESSECU.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GANGESSECU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GANGESSECU.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ROML.NS Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ROML.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while ROML.NS trades at ₹42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas ROML.NS's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROML.NS's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ROML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ROML.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GANGESSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GANGESSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹484.55, while GANGESSEC.BO trades at ₹126.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 42.24, whereas GANGESSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GANGESSEC.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GANGESSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GANGESSEC.BO's competition here