Hindustan Foods Limited
Hindustan Foods Limited (HNDFDS.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HNDFDS.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNDFDS.BO | ₹491.25 | -3.70% | 59.1B | 43.14 | ₹11.47 | N/A |
| NESTLEIND.NS | ₹1,191.30 | +1.40% | 2.3T | 69.79 | ₹16.92 | +0.96% |
| NESTLEIND.BO | ₹1,191.60 | +1.43% | 2.3T | 69.74 | ₹16.93 | +0.96% |
| BRITANNIA.BO | ₹5,442.60 | +0.30% | 1.3T | 56.81 | ₹96.39 | +1.37% |
| BRITANNIA.NS | ₹5,442.00 | +0.35% | 1.3T | 54.56 | ₹100.33 | +1.37% |
| TATACONSUM.NS | ₹1,042.00 | +2.68% | 1T | 69.08 | ₹14.82 | +0.81% |
| TATACONSUM.BO | ₹1,042.10 | +2.73% | 1T | 69.13 | ₹14.81 | +0.81% |
| PATANJALI.BO | ₹467.70 | +1.95% | 512B | 31.08 | ₹15.14 | +0.94% |
| PATANJALI.NS | ₹466.95 | +1.57% | 511.4B | 30.99 | ₹15.17 | +0.94% |
| AWL.BO | ₹183.60 | +3.20% | 236.4B | 25.03 | ₹7.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HNDFDS.BO vs NESTLEIND.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while NESTLEIND.NS trades at ₹1,191.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas NESTLEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 69.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.NS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to NESTLEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs NESTLEIND.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while NESTLEIND.BO trades at ₹1,191.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas NESTLEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 69.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.BO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to NESTLEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BRITANNIA.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BRITANNIA.BO trades at ₹5,442.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BRITANNIA.BO's P/E ratio is 56.81. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.BO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BRITANNIA.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BRITANNIA.NS trades at ₹5,442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BRITANNIA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.NS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to BRITANNIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACONSUM.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TATACONSUM.NS trades at ₹1,042.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TATACONSUM.NS's P/E ratio is 69.08. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACONSUM.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TATACONSUM.BO trades at ₹1,042.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TATACONSUM.BO's P/E ratio is 69.13. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PATANJALI.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PATANJALI.BO has a market cap of 512B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while PATANJALI.BO trades at ₹467.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas PATANJALI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PATANJALI.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PATANJALI.NS has a market cap of 511.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while PATANJALI.NS trades at ₹466.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas PATANJALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AWL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AWL.BO has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while AWL.BO trades at ₹183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas AWL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AWL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AWL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HATSUN.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HATSUN.NS has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HATSUN.NS trades at ₹902.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HATSUN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.49. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HATSUN.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HATSUN.BO has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HATSUN.BO trades at ₹900.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HATSUN.BO's P/E ratio is 57.31. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AVANTIFEED.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.NS has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while AVANTIFEED.NS trades at ₹1,213.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas AVANTIFEED.NS's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs AVANTIFEED.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.BO has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while AVANTIFEED.BO trades at ₹1,213.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas AVANTIFEED.BO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BIKAJI.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BIKAJI.BO has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BIKAJI.BO trades at ₹627.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BIKAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 63.30. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BIKAJI.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BIKAJI.NS has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BIKAJI.NS trades at ₹627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BIKAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 63.21. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CCL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CCL.NS has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while CCL.NS trades at ₹1,093.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas CCL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CCL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CCL.BO has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while CCL.BO trades at ₹1,093.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas CCL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs LTFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LTFOODS.NS has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while LTFOODS.NS trades at ₹386.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas LTFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs LTFOODS.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LTFOODS.BO has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while LTFOODS.BO trades at ₹386.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas LTFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BBTC.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BBTC.BO has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BBTC.BO trades at ₹1,410.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BBTC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BBTC.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BBTC.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BBTC.NS trades at ₹1,410.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BBTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ORKLAINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ORKLAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ORKLAINDIA.NS trades at ₹603.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ORKLAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ORKLAINDIA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MANORAMA.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MANORAMA.BO trades at ₹1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MANORAMA.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MANORAMA.NS has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MANORAMA.NS trades at ₹1,219.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MANORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRBL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRBL.NS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while KRBL.NS trades at ₹307.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas KRBL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRBL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRBL.BO has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while KRBL.BO trades at ₹306.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas KRBL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DAAWAT.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DAAWAT.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DAAWAT.NS trades at ₹189.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DAAWAT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAAWAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DAAWAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DAAWAT.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACOFFEE.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TATACOFFEE.BO trades at ₹344.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TATACOFFEE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOFFEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACOFFEE.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GAEL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GAEL.BO has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GAEL.BO trades at ₹140.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GAEL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GAEL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GAEL.NS has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GAEL.NS trades at ₹140.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GAEL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TATACOFFEE.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TATACOFFEE.NS trades at ₹334.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TATACOFFEE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HNDFDS.BO has daily volatility of 2.22 and TATACOFFEE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TATACOFFEE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HNDFDS.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HNDFDS.NS has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HNDFDS.NS trades at ₹490.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HNDFDS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HNDFDS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HNDFDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HNDFDS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BECTORFOOD.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BECTORFOOD.NS trades at ₹189.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BECTORFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BECTORFOOD.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.BO has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BECTORFOOD.BO trades at ₹189.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BECTORFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TASTYBIT.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TASTYBIT.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TASTYBIT.BO trades at ₹14,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TASTYBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBIT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBIT.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOPAL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GOPAL.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GOPAL.NS trades at ₹261.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GOPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 804.24. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOPAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOPAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs VADILALIND.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VADILALIND.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while VADILALIND.BO trades at ₹4,301.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas VADILALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to VADILALIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs VADILALIND.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VADILALIND.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while VADILALIND.NS trades at ₹4,295.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas VADILALIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ATFL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ATFL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ATFL.NS trades at ₹785.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ATFL.NS's P/E ratio is 344.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ATFL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ATFL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ATFL.BO trades at ₹784.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ATFL.BO's P/E ratio is 342.53. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HERITGFOOD.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HERITGFOOD.BO trades at ₹311.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HERITGFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HERITGFOOD.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HERITGFOOD.NS trades at ₹311.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HERITGFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GRMOVER.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GRMOVER.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GRMOVER.NS trades at ₹155.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GRMOVER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.77. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GRMOVER.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GRMOVER.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GRMOVER.BO trades at ₹155.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GRMOVER.BO's P/E ratio is 48.93. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKULAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GOKULAGRO.NS trades at ₹193.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GOKULAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKULAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GOKULAGRO.BO trades at ₹193.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GOKULAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ZYDUSWELL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ZYDUSWELL.NS trades at ₹443.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ZYDUSWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ZYDUSWELL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ZYDUSWELL.BO trades at ₹444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ZYDUSWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 66.19. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DFMFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DFMFOODS.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DFMFOODS.NS trades at ₹461.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DFMFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFMFOODS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to DFMFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DFMFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DIAMONDYD.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DIAMONDYD.NS trades at ₹955.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DIAMONDYD.NS's P/E ratio is -691.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DIAMONDYD.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DIAMONDYD.BO trades at ₹959.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DIAMONDYD.BO's P/E ratio is -683.94. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PARAGMILK.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while PARAGMILK.BO trades at ₹193.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas PARAGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PARAGMILK.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while PARAGMILK.NS trades at ₹193.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas PARAGMILK.NS's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SUNDROP.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SUNDROP.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SUNDROP.NS trades at ₹585.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SUNDROP.NS's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SUNDROP.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SUNDROP.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SUNDROP.BO trades at ₹580.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SUNDROP.BO's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs BNAGROCHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BNAGROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while BNAGROCHEM.BO trades at ₹220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas BNAGROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BNAGROCHEM.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ADFFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ADFFOODS.NS trades at ₹177.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ADFFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ADFFOODS.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ADFFOODS.BO trades at ₹178.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ADFFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs TASTYBITE.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TASTYBITE.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while TASTYBITE.NS trades at ₹6,739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas TASTYBITE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBITE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HMAAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HMAAGRO.NS trades at ₹23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HMAAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs HMAAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while HMAAGRO.BO trades at ₹23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas HMAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CLSEL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CLSEL.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while CLSEL.NS trades at ₹242.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas CLSEL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CLSEL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CLSEL.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while CLSEL.BO trades at ₹242.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas CLSEL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SKMEGGPROD.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SKMEGGPROD.NS trades at ₹158.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SKMEGGPROD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SKMEGGPROD.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SKMEGGPROD.BO trades at ₹157.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SKMEGGPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRISHIVAL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRISHIVAL.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while KRISHIVAL.NS trades at ₹321.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas KRISHIVAL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRISHIVAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHIVAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRISHIVAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs REGAAL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, REGAAL.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while REGAAL.NS trades at ₹67.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas REGAAL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGAAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to REGAAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check REGAAL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MUKKA.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MUKKA.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MUKKA.NS trades at ₹20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MUKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUKKA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MUKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MUKKA.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs EIFFL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, EIFFL.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while EIFFL.NS trades at ₹226.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas EIFFL.NS's P/E ratio is 100.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIFFL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to EIFFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check EIFFL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs FOODSIN.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, FOODSIN.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while FOODSIN.NS trades at ₹54.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas FOODSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs FOODSIN.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, FOODSIN.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while FOODSIN.BO trades at ₹53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas FOODSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKUL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GOKUL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GOKUL.BO trades at ₹38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GOKUL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GOKUL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GOKUL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GOKUL.NS trades at ₹38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GOKUL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SARVESHWAR.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SARVESHWAR.BO trades at ₹3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SARVESHWAR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SARVESHWAR.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SARVESHWAR.NS trades at ₹3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SARVESHWAR.NS's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SCPL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SCPL.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SCPL.BO trades at ₹321.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to SCPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs SCPL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SCPL.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while SCPL.NS trades at ₹322.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas SCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs JAYSHREETEA.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JAYSHREETEA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while JAYSHREETEA.BO trades at ₹107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas JAYSHREETEA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check JAYSHREETEA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs COASTCORP.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, COASTCORP.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while COASTCORP.BO trades at ₹46.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas COASTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs COASTCORP.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, COASTCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while COASTCORP.NS trades at ₹45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas COASTCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MEGASTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MEGASTAR.NS trades at ₹264.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MEGASTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MEGASTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MEGASTAR.BO trades at ₹261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MEGASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to MEGASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRITINUT.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRITINUT.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while KRITINUT.NS trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas KRITINUT.NS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs KRITINUT.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KRITINUT.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while KRITINUT.BO trades at ₹61.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas KRITINUT.BO's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs WATERBASE.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WATERBASE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while WATERBASE.NS trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas WATERBASE.NS's P/E ratio is -53.19. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs CHATHA.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CHATHA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while CHATHA.BO trades at ₹73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas CHATHA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHATHA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CHATHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CHATHA.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs UMANGDAIR.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, UMANGDAIR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while UMANGDAIR.BO trades at ₹76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas UMANGDAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMANGDAIR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to UMANGDAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check UMANGDAIR.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs WATERBASE.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WATERBASE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while WATERBASE.BO trades at ₹41.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas WATERBASE.BO's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MKPL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MKPL.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MKPL.BO trades at ₹4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MKPL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs MKPL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MKPL.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while MKPL.NS trades at ₹4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas MKPL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DHUNTEAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DHUNTEAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DHUNTEAIND.BO trades at ₹221.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DHUNTEAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DHUNTEAIND.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GANGESSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GANGESSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GANGESSEC.BO trades at ₹126.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GANGESSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GANGESSEC.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GANGESSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GANGESSEC.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DTIL.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DTIL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DTIL.NS trades at ₹122.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DTIL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs PALASHSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PALASHSEC.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while PALASHSEC.BO trades at ₹120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas PALASHSEC.BO's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PALASHSEC.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to PALASHSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PALASHSEC.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs DTIL.BO Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while DTIL.BO trades at ₹122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas DTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.BO's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs ROML.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ROML.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while ROML.NS trades at ₹40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas ROML.NS's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROML.NS's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ROML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ROML.NS's competition here
HNDFDS.BO vs GANGESSECU.NS Comparison April 2026
HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GANGESSECU.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹491.25, while GANGESSECU.NS trades at ₹112.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 43.14, whereas GANGESSECU.NS's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GANGESSECU.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GANGESSECU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GANGESSECU.NS's competition here