H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) HMRZF Peers
See (HMRZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMRZF | $15.50 | N/A | 21.9B | 21.83 | $0.71 | +4.20% |
| HNNMY | $2.83 | +1.07% | 116.2B | 20.21 | $0.14 | +0.48% |
| MONRY | $61.36 | +1.30% | 16.6B | 22.90 | $2.68 | +2.10% |
| MONRF | $60.90 | -3.97% | 16.5B | 22.72 | $2.68 | +2.11% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | N/A | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| TRYIF | $7.02 | N/A | 11B | 20.65 | $0.34 | +1.74% |
| TRYIY | $13.49 | -0.81% | 10.5B | 19.55 | $0.69 | +0.52% |
| SHZHY | $6.79 | -1.74% | 10.2B | 16.97 | $0.40 | +4.82% |
| BSDGF | $0.56 | +3.85% | 6.4B | 13.93 | $0.04 | +5.99% |
| BSDGY | $27.25 | N/A | 6.2B | 13.42 | $2.03 | +6.12% |
Stock Comparison
HMRZF vs HNNMY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while HNNMY trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs MONRY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while MONRY trades at $61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs MONRF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while MONRF trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SZHIF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TRYIF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TRYIF trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TRYIY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TRYIY trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SHZHY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SHZHY trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs BSDGF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while BSDGF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs BSDGY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while BSDGY trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs RYPPF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs BOSSY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while BOSSY trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs WACLY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CGGGF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CGGGF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs DELTF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while DELTF trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs JNBYF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while JNBYF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SERNF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs WACLF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WACLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs MKKOF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs JWTXF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TSIHF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TSIHF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs VDEVF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CDGXF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CDGXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CDGXY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CDGXY trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs WQTEF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs ECNLF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while ECNLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CHRLF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TFRFF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs NLLGF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TAPCF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs LPPSY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while LPPSY trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs IFABF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while IFABF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs USYNF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TUGHF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SEPGY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SEPGF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs AVLP Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TALN Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TALN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs AHRO Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CRTL Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CRTL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CGAC Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs JLMC Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs PBBSF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SKFG Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 483.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs BLFR Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 407.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while BLFR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SUUB Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs AGNY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs CIND Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs OMVE Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs LYJN Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs TRUA Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs EDSFF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs APPM Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs IBGR Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs LZENF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SSTU Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs SUFF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs WLFDY Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs JKRO Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.
HMRZF vs GLLHF Comparison
HMRZF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMRZF stands at 21.9B. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMRZF is priced at $15.50, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMRZF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.83, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HMRZF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMRZF is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMRZF.