Horizons Marijuana Life Sciences Index ETF

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BKAMF has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BKAMF trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKAMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKAMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BKAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BKFPF has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BKFPF trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKFPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKFPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BKFPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BAMKF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BAMKF trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMKF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAMKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BAMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BXDIF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BXDIF trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXDIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BXDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BKFAF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BKFAF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKFAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to BKFAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BAMGF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BAMGF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMGF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAMGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BAMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BROXF has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BROXF trades at $14.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BROXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BROXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BROXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IVSXF has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IVSXF trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVSXF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVSXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IVSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IVSBF has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IVSBF trades at $28.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVSBF's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVSBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IVSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TGOPF has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TGOPF trades at $58.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOPF's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGOPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TGOPY has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TGOPY trades at $28.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGOPY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGOPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TGOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while VNGDF trades at $116.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to VNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, EQBBF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while EQBBF trades at $32.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQBBF's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to EQBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, PGPHF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while PGPHF trades at $1,278.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPHF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGPHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to PGPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, LGGNF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while LGGNF trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGNF's P/E ratio is 91.19. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to LGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IHPCF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IHPCF trades at $60.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHPCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IHPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IVTBF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IVTBF trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVTBF's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IVTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, STMZF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while STMZF trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STMZF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STMZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to STMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AMDUF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AMDUF trades at $70.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMDUF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMDUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to AMDUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, JBARF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while JBARF trades at $67.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBARF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBARF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to JBARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, JBAXY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while JBAXY trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBAXY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBAXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to JBAXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IDTVF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IDTVF trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDTVF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDTVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IDTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IDDTF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IDDTF trades at $30.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDDTF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDDTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to IDDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, HALFF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while HALFF trades at $140.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALFF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HALFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to HALFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, LBGUF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while LBGUF trades at $45.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBGUF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LBGUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to LBGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SBHGF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SBHGF trades at $34.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBHGF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SBHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, GSCE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while GSCE trades at $31.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSCE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to GSCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, GBLBF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while GBLBF trades at $81.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLBF's P/E ratio is 291.46. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to GBLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, GBLBY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while GBLBY trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLBY's P/E ratio is 263.33. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to GBLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, PSHZF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while PSHZF trades at $53.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSHZF's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSHZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to PSHZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, MGPUF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while MGPUF trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPUF's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGPUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to MGPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SFNXF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SFNXF trades at $237.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFNXF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFNXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SFNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SHNWF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SHNWF trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNWF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SHNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IGIFF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IGIFF trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGIFF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGIFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IGIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, STJPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while STJPF trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STJPF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STJPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to STJPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ICGUF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ICGUF trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICGUF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICGUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ICGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, FLIVF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while FLIVF trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLIVF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLIVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to FLIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IVPEF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IVPEF trades at $131.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVPEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IVPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, DAXXF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while DAXXF trades at $159.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to DAXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ALITF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ALITF trades at $15.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALITF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALITF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ALITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AFOVF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AFOVF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFOVF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to AFOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, HRGLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while HRGLF trades at $12.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRGLF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRGLF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to HRGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, HRGLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while HRGLY trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRGLY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRGLY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to HRGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ONEXF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ONEXF trades at $80.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEXF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ONEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, HSXUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while HSXUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSXUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSXUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to HSXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ISRPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ISRPF trades at $100.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISRPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ISRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, CCGDF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while CCGDF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCGDF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCGDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to CCGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TTBXF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TTBXF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTBXF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTBXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TTBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, EUZOF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while EUZOF trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUZOF's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUZOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to EUZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SLFPY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SLFPY trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLFPY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLFPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SLFPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while VUKEF trades at $46.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to VUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SLFPF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SLFPF trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLFPF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLFPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SLFPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, REVNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while REVNF trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REVNF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REVNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to REVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AZIHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AZIHF trades at $31.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZIHF's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZIHF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to AZIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, WNDLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while WNDLF trades at $97.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNDLF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNDLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to WNDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, RMGOF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while RMGOF trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGOF's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMGOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to RMGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, VONHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while VONHF trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONHF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VONHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to VONHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TKKHF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TKKHF trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKKHF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKKHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TKKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, RITPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while RITPF trades at $25.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITPF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RITPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to RITPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AMSPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AMSPF trades at $117.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to AMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while MEIEF trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to MEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, VGDDF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while VGDDF trades at $110.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGDDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGDDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to VGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, PVVLF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while PVVLF trades at $47.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVVLF's P/E ratio is 119.90. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to PVVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, NINTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while NINTF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINTF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NINTF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to NINTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BMMWF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BMMWF trades at $38.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMMWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMMWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BMMWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, MNKIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while MNKIF trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNKIF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNKIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to MNKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, QUILF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while QUILF trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUILF's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUILF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to QUILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BBAGF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BBAGF trades at $37.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBAGF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBAGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to BBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TKCPF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TKCPF trades at $49.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKCPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKCPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TKCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IXSRF trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, FFXDF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while FFXDF trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFXDF's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFXDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to FFXDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BZSPF trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BZSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, RTBBF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while RTBBF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTBBF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to RTBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, CALEF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while CALEF trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALEF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CALEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to CALEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ISMCF trades at $629.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ENDTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ENDTF trades at $11.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENDTF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENDTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ENDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, FECHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while FECHF trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FECHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FECHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to FECHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, JTCPF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while JTCPF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTCPF's P/E ratio is -198.33. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JTCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to JTCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, WTNTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while WTNTF trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTNTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to WTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TXEMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TXEMF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXEMF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TXEMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TXEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, SFFFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while SFFFF trades at $71.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFFFF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to SFFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, EHITF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while EHITF trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHITF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to EHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BHMDF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BHMDF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BHMDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BHMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AJMPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AJMPF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJMPF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AJMPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to AJMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, ISCMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while ISCMF trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISCMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to ISCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, PPTTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while PPTTF trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPTTF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPTTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to PPTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BWMTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BWMTF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWMTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BWMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BWMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, TGONF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while TGONF trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGONF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGONF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to TGONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, CYMBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while CYMBF trades at $59.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYMBF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to CYMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, AVGTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while AVGTF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to AVGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, CEVIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while CEVIF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVIF's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEVIF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to CEVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BLGFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BLGFF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLGFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to BLGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, RTOBF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while RTOBF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTOBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to RTOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IHRMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IHRMF trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IHRMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IHRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, BRSGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while BRSGF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSGF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRSGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to BRSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, IGBSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while IGBSF trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGBSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGBSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to IGBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, UCPLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while UCPLF trades at $97.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCPLF's P/E ratio is -65.52. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UCPLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to UCPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, MGLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while MGLLF trades at $6.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGLLF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to MGLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.

HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 35M. In comparison, CRPFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $4.78, while CRPFY trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRPFY's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRPFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is more volatile compared to CRPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.