Horizons Marijuana Life Sciences Index ETF (HMLSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HMLSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMLSF | $5.35 | +137.77% | 32.1M | N/A | N/A | +1.36% |
| VNGDF | $139.95 | -0.57% | 52.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.88% |
| VUKEF | $60.20 | -0.50% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.04% |
| IXSRF | $9.13 | +2.72% | 5.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MEIEF | $11.11 | +3.17% | 5.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ISMCF | $764.98 | -0.20% | 4.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BZSPF | $80.98 | -2.67% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.77% |
| FCBRF | $56.43 | -2.35% | 1.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HFAHF | $1.11 | -23.18% | 612.2M | 5.05 | $0.22 | +2.70% |
| VSTKF | $2.15 | +8.31% | 275.2M | -2.83 | -$0.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HMLSF vs VNGDF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while VNGDF trades at $139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to VNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check VNGDF's competition here
HMLSF vs VUKEF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while VUKEF trades at $60.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and VUKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUKEF's competition here
HMLSF vs IXSRF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while IXSRF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to IXSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check IXSRF's competition here
HMLSF vs MEIEF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while MEIEF trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and MEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEIEF's competition here
HMLSF vs ISMCF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while ISMCF trades at $764.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check ISMCF's competition here
HMLSF vs BZSPF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while BZSPF trades at $80.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to BZSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check BZSPF's competition here
HMLSF vs FCBRF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, FCBRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while FCBRF trades at $56.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCBRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCBRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and FCBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCBRF's competition here
HMLSF vs HFAHF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, HFAHF has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while HFAHF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFAHF's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFAHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to HFAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check HFAHF's competition here
HMLSF vs VSTKF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VSTKF has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while VSTKF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTKF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSTKF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to VSTKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check VSTKF's competition here
HMLSF vs MMAVX Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MMAVX has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while MMAVX trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMAVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and MMAVX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMAVX's competition here
HMLSF vs ESIFF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ESIFF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while ESIFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESIFF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESIFF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and ESIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESIFF's competition here
HMLSF vs EATBF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, EATBF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while EATBF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATBF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATBF's ROE of -26.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to EATBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check EATBF's competition here
HMLSF vs RSCZF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, RSCZF has a market cap of 46.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while RSCZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSCZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSCZF's ROE of -6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to RSCZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check RSCZF's competition here
HMLSF vs GVHIB Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GVHIB has a market cap of 7.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while GVHIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVHIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GVHIB's ROE of -19.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF is less volatile compared to GVHIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMLSF.Check GVHIB's competition here
HMLSF vs GOOI Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GOOI has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while GOOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOOI's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and GOOI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOOI's competition here
HMLSF vs CMBXF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CMBXF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while CMBXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMBXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMBXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and CMBXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMBXF's competition here
HMLSF vs 0P0000ZLBW Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, 0P0000ZLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while 0P0000ZLBW trades at $303.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000ZLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000ZLBW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and 0P0000ZLBW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0000ZLBW's competition here
HMLSF vs 0P0000V0SF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, 0P0000V0SF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while 0P0000V0SF trades at $170.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000V0SF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000V0SF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and 0P0000V0SF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0000V0SF's competition here
HMLSF vs 0P0000YVM9 Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, 0P0000YVM9 has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while 0P0000YVM9 trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000YVM9's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0000YVM9's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and 0P0000YVM9 have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0000YVM9's competition here
HMLSF vs FRCGF Comparison June 2026
HMLSF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMLSF stands at 32.1M. In comparison, FRCGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMLSF is priced at $5.35, while FRCGF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMLSF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMLSF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRCGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMLSF and FRCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRCGF's competition here