Global Care Capital Inc.
Global Care Capital Inc. (HLTH.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLTH.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLTH.CN | CA$0.01 | +0.00% | 3.2M | -0.17 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| IGAF.TO | CA$16.01 | +0.00% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| TEC.TO | CA$49.55 | +0.16% | 3.3B | 36.00 | CA$1.38 | +0.11% |
| XGD.TO | CA$36.95 | +0.33% | 2.1B | 20.89 | CA$1.77 | +0.65% |
| TGED.TO | CA$28.66 | -0.31% | 1.2B | 30.70 | CA$0.93 | +3.40% |
| DXG.TO | CA$73.38 | -0.37% | 756.9M | 32.81 | CA$2.24 | +11.15% |
| CIF.TO | CA$54.59 | -0.60% | 735.3M | 15.30 | CA$3.57 | +2.84% |
| FSF.TO | CA$34.77 | +0.35% | 610.8M | N/A | N/A | +1.17% |
| XDG.TO | CA$29.20 | -0.51% | 508M | 18.25 | CA$1.60 | +2.89% |
| CINF.TO | CA$29.36 | -1.11% | 467.2M | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
Stock Comparison
HLTH.CN vs IGAF.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while IGAF.TO trades at CA$16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to IGAF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check IGAF.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs TEC.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TEC.TO trades at CA$49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check TEC.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XGD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XGD.TO trades at CA$36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check XGD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs TGED.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TGED.TO trades at CA$28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check TGED.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs DXG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DXG.TO trades at CA$73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check DXG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CIF.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CIF.TO trades at CA$54.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CIF.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs FSF.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 610.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FSF.TO trades at CA$34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and FSF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSF.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XDG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 508M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XDG.TO trades at CA$29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check XDG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CINF.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 467.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CINF.TO trades at CA$29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CINF.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XHC.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XHC.TO trades at CA$63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check XHC.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs TQGD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TQGD.TO trades at CA$22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check TQGD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 330.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at CA$13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and 0P0001ED1S.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001ED1S.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CWW.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CWW.TO trades at CA$65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CWW.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs ZWG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ZWG.TO trades at CA$32.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check ZWG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs COW.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while COW.TO trades at CA$70.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check COW.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs VMO.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VMO.TO trades at CA$72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check VMO.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CGR.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CGR.TO trades at CA$31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CGR.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at CA$24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and 0P0001ODDT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001ODDT.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs GDV.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GDV.TO trades at CA$11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check GDV.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs LIFE.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 177.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LIFE.TO trades at CA$18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check LIFE.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CYH.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CYH.TO trades at CA$23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CYH.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs ZGD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ZGD.TO trades at CA$182.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check ZGD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XGI.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XGI.TO trades at CA$61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and XGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XGI.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CGLO.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CGLO.TO trades at CA$31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CGLO.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XDGH.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XDGH.TO trades at CA$28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check XDGH.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs PMNT.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PMNT.TO trades at CA$18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check PMNT.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs TGRE.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TGRE.TO trades at CA$15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check TGRE.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XMY.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XMY.TO trades at CA$33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and XMY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XMY.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs XCD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while XCD.TO trades at CA$62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check XCD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs LONG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LONG.TO trades at CA$38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and LONG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LONG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs ONEQ.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ONEQ.TO trades at CA$47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and ONEQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONEQ.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs GIQG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GIQG.TO trades at CA$31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and GIQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIQG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at CA$14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and 0P0001NDFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001NDFE.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs ESGG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ESGG.TO trades at CA$54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check ESGG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs TGGR.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while TGGR.TO trades at CA$28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check TGGR.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs VVO.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VVO.TO trades at CA$39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and VVO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VVO.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs DXN.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DXN.TO trades at CA$23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check DXN.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs HGGG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HGGG.TO trades at CA$59.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check HGGG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs ZMT.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ZMT.TO trades at CA$78.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and ZMT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMT.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at CA$41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and 0P0001N8LS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001N8LS.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs PINV.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PINV.TO trades at CA$23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and PINV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PINV.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs VAH.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VAH.TO trades at CA$28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check VAH.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs MIVG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MIVG.TO trades at CA$38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check MIVG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs CGAA.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CGAA.TO trades at CA$29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check CGAA.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs RWU.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RWU.TO trades at CA$20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and RWU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWU.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs VLQ.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VLQ.TO trades at CA$32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and VLQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLQ.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs FLGD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FLGD.TO trades at CA$29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and FLGD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLGD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs RIG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RIG.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and RIG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIG.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs HRA.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HRA.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check HRA.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs SOL.CN Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SOL.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and SOL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOL.CN's competition here
HLTH.CN vs RLD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RLD.TO trades at CA$24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and RLD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs EATS.CN Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while EATS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check EATS.CN's competition here
HLTH.CN vs SHZ.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SHZ.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and SHZ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHZ.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs DFD.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DFD.TO trades at CA$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and DFD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFD.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs DFE.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while DFE.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and DFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFE.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs RLE.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while RLE.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLTH.CN.Check RLE.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs HGM.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HGM.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and HGM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGM.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs PSY.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PSY.TO trades at CA$30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and PSY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSY.TO's competition here
HLTH.CN vs PXG.TO Comparison August 2025
HLTH.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLTH.CN stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLTH.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PXG.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLTH.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, HLTH.CN's ROE is -140.65%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLTH.CN and PXG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXG.TO's competition here