Holmen AB (publ)
Holmen AB (publ) HLMNY Peers
See (HLMNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMNY | $21.25 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 25.91 | $0.82 | +1.62% |
| KLBAY | $6.99 | -4.12% | 22.4B | 66.91 | $0.11 | +5.62% |
| UPMMY | $28.66 | +5.10% | 15.1B | 42.82 | $0.67 | +6.06% |
| UPMKF | $26.69 | -4.10% | 14.1B | 40.44 | $0.66 | +6.07% |
| SVCBF | $13.13 | -1.61% | 9.2B | 23.87 | $0.55 | +2.28% |
| SCABY | $14.30 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 26.00 | $0.55 | +2.06% |
| SEOAY | $11.32 | +5.06% | 9B | -75.20 | -$0.15 | +2.15% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
| MONDY | $33.87 | +1.10% | 7.5B | 29.72 | $1.13 | +4.95% |
| SEOJF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 6.8B | -57.07 | -$0.15 | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
HLMNY vs KLBAY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while KLBAY trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs UPMMY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while UPMMY trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs UPMKF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while UPMKF trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and UPMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SVCBF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SVCBF trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SVCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SCABY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SCABY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SCABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SEOAY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SEOAY trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -75.20. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs MONDF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs MONDY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while MONDY trades at $33.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs SEOJF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs OJIPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while OJIPF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs OJIPY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while OJIPY trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and OJIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs STLJF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while STLJF trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs BLRDF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while BLRDF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BLRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs POELF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while POELF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and POELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs NDGPY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while NDGPY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and NDGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs PIKQF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while PIKQF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and PIKQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs NDGPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while NDGPF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and NDGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs CFPZF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while CFPZF trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs LMPMF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SPPJY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SPPJY trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs LMPMY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while LMPMY trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and LMPMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs NIJPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and NIJPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs TKFTF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs IFSPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 498.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while IFSPF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs PKNOF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs ACAZF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while ACAZF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs ACSYF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while ACSYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and ACSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs RTTNY Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs RTERF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs WFSTF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while WFSTF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and WFSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs GFELF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while GFELF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and GFELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs ICLTF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while ICLTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and ICLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs KEWL Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while KEWL trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and KEWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs RUBNF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while RUBNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RUBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs CFPUF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while CFPUF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and CFPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs BRGSF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs TCOR Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while TCOR trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SUPBF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs CFXTF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while CFXTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and CFXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs WBNEF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and WBNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SGTM Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SGTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.
HLMNY vs BMSPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BMSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs HMTC Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while HMTC trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs BSTO Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while BSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs SGMD Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs EXRG Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and EXRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs ZMGD Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and ZMGD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs BPMI Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs KPCM Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs HAIPF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HLMNY vs VRDSF Comparison
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $21.25, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 25.91, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).