High Liner Foods Incorporated
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF.TO | CA$17.14 | +1.18% | 498.1M | 6.52 | CA$2.63 | +4.95% |
| SAP.TO | CA$28.55 | -1.75% | 11.8B | -69.63 | -CA$0.41 | +2.66% |
| PBH.TO | CA$87.11 | -0.83% | 3.9B | 33.00 | CA$2.64 | +3.90% |
| MFI.TO | CA$28.93 | -1.06% | 3.6B | 38.07 | CA$0.76 | +3.17% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$33.65 | +0.03% | 1.4B | 27.58 | CA$1.22 | +2.50% |
| SOY.TO | CA$7.89 | -2.11% | 927.4M | -65.75 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| BOIL.CN | CA$2.63 | -0.38% | 184.9M | -7.31 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.02 | -0.97% | 132.1M | -51.00 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.63 | +5.00% | 55.1M | -21.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FRSH.CN | CA$0.85 | -5.56% | 44.4M | -6.54 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLF.TO vs SAP.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while SAP.TO trades at CA$28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -69.63. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SAP.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs PBH.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while PBH.TO trades at CA$87.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PBH.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs MFI.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while MFI.TO trades at CA$28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MFI.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs JWEL.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check JWEL.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs SOY.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while SOY.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SOY.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs BOIL.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while BOIL.CN trades at CA$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BOIL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs HBFG.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check HBFG.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs GFCO.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check GFCO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs FRSH.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while FRSH.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FRSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FRSH.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs SWP.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while SWP.TO trades at CA$4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SWP.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs BU.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while BU.TO trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BU.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs ELMT.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ELMT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs NPRA.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check NPRA.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs BABY.TO Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BABY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BABY.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs PNGA.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PNGA.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs PSYC.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PSYC.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs LLP.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while LLP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to LLP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check LLP.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs EMRG.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to EMRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check EMRG.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs BITE.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BITE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BITE.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MOOO.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MOOO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs PLBL.NE Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PLBL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PLBL.NE's competition here
HLF.TO vs CULT.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 935.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check CULT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs VEGI.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VEGI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VEGI.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MEAT.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 493.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs FIT.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FIT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FIT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs VAGN.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VAGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VAGN.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs YUM.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to YUM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check YUM.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs ARTO.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to ARTO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ARTO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs VEJI.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HLF.TO has daily volatility of 9.93 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check VEJI.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MEAL.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs FUEL.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FUEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FUEL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs RSF.CN Comparison August 2025
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 498.1M. In comparison, RSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$17.14, while RSF.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.52, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HLF.TO has daily volatility of 9.93 and RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RSF.CN's competition here