High Liner Foods Incorporated
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF.TO | CA$14.35 | +1.49% | 406.1M | 8.44 | CA$1.70 | +4.82% |
| SAP.TO | CA$43.65 | +1.02% | 17.7B | 27.98 | CA$1.56 | +1.81% |
| MFI.TO | CA$29.94 | +1.49% | 3.7B | 88.06 | CA$0.34 | +4.87% |
| PBH.TO | CA$82.71 | -0.28% | 3.7B | 91.90 | CA$0.90 | +4.10% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$34.62 | +0.61% | 1.4B | 23.71 | CA$1.46 | +2.60% |
| SOY.TO | CA$9.05 | +0.33% | 1.1B | 50.28 | CA$0.18 | N/A |
| BOIL.CN | CA$2.88 | +1.05% | 204.2M | -9.00 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.53 | -1.92% | 200.1M | -153.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| TRBR.V | CA$1.64 | +0.61% | 176.8M | -9.11 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.63 | +5.00% | 55.1M | -21.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLF.TO vs SAP.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while SAP.TO trades at CA$43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SAP.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs MFI.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while MFI.TO trades at CA$29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 88.06. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MFI.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs PBH.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while PBH.TO trades at CA$82.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 91.90. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PBH.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs JWEL.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check JWEL.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs SOY.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while SOY.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is 50.28. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SOY.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs BOIL.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while BOIL.CN trades at CA$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BOIL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs HBFG.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -153.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check HBFG.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs TRBR.V Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, TRBR.V has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while TRBR.V trades at CA$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas TRBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRBR.V's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to TRBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check TRBR.V's competition here
HLF.TO vs GFCO.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check GFCO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs SWP.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while SWP.TO trades at CA$4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is -465.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SWP.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs FRSH.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while FRSH.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FRSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FRSH.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs BU.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while BU.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BU.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs NPRA.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check NPRA.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs ELMT.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ELMT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs PNGA.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PNGA.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs PSYC.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PSYC.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs LLP.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while LLP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to LLP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check LLP.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs EMRG.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to EMRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check EMRG.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs BABY.TO Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of +54.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to BABY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BABY.TO's competition here
HLF.TO vs BITE.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BITE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BITE.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MEAT.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MOOO.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of +2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MOOO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs PLBL.NE Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PLBL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PLBL.NE's competition here
HLF.TO vs VEGI.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VEGI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VEGI.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs FIT.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -15.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FIT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FIT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs CULT.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 448K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check CULT.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs VAGN.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 440.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VAGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VAGN.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs YUM.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to YUM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check YUM.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs ARTO.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of -17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to ARTO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ARTO.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs VEJI.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HLF.TO has daily volatility of 2.39 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check VEJI.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs MEAL.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs FUEL.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FUEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FUEL.CN's competition here
HLF.TO vs RSF.CN Comparison April 2026
HLF.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 406.1M. In comparison, RSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.35, while RSF.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of -17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HLF.TO has daily volatility of 2.39 and RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RSF.CN's competition here