HeidelbergCement AG
HeidelbergCement AG HLBZF Peers
See (HLBZF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLBZF | $204.63 | +0.00% | 35.8B | 18.69 | $10.95 | +1.58% |
| HCMLY | $22.91 | -1.08% | 63.2B | 18.18 | $1.26 | N/A |
| HCMLF | $114.15 | -2.19% | 62.9B | 18.06 | $6.32 | +3.26% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.53% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | N/A | 30.3B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.81% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | N/A | 21.2B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +0.61% |
| AHCHF | $2.89 | +20.42% | 18B | 13.76 | $0.21 | +4.60% |
| BHBSY | $0.40 | N/A | 18B | -4.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| AHCHY | $13.06 | -1.66% | 16.4B | 12.44 | $1.05 | +5.04% |
| IMYSY | $5.74 | N/A | 14.1B | -22.96 | -$0.25 | +4.48% |
Stock Comparison
HLBZF vs HCMLY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while HCMLY trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs HCMLF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while HCMLF trades at $114.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to HCMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CRHCF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CRHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs UCLQF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to UCLQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs GRSXY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to GRSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs AHCHF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BHBSY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BHBSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs AHCHY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while AHCHY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs IMYSY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to IMYSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs JHIUF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while JHIUF trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CXMSF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CXMSF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CXMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BZZUY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BZZUY trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BZZUF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BZZUF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs TGBMF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to TGBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs ADLDY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs HDELY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs XYIGF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while XYIGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CBUMF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs XYIGY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while XYIGY trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to XYIGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs FCREY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BOALF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs WBRBY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while WBRBY trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BOALY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BOALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BBMPY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs WBRBF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to WBRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs THYCY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while THYCY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to THYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs GCWOF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while GCWOF trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs THYCF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while THYCF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs IMYSF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while IMYSF trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -25.56. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CMZOF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CMZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BRKWF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs FRCEF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while FRCEF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs HCPHY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to HCPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs SDCVF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while SDCVF trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CARCY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CARCY trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PITPF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CJRCF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CJRCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs ADBCF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to ADBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CCGLF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PITPY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs WCHNF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while WCHNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PSGTY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PSGTY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PTHIF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to PTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs SUCEF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs IBJHF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 811.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PSGTF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 810.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PSGTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs MCEM Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while MCEM trades at $244.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CMTOY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 575.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CMTOY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 368.33. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs FTTRF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 560.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while FTTRF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to FTTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CWXZF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 528.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CWXZF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CGCLF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PPCLY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PPCLY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to PPCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs TGAFF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while TGAFF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CHYMF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CHYMF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BSND Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 118.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BSND trades at $875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BURCP Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to BURCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CBUMY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CBUMY trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs SPPCF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to SPPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs ZHIXF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to ZHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs RTGOF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to RTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CTXXF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PTHIY Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to PTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs ACPS Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while ACPS trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs BASA Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while BASA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs LKSGF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while LKSGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs PNLT Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to PNLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs SNLP Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to SNLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs CHGS Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to CHGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs WWST Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to WWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs LXRRF Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to LXRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs TJSS Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.
HLBZF vs AQCP Comparison
HLBZF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZF stands at 35.8B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZF is priced at $204.63, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.69, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZF is more volatile compared to AQCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZF.