HK Battery Technology, Inc.
HK Battery Technology, Inc. (HKBT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HKBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKBT | $0.06 | +0.00% | 4M | 0.23 | $0.26 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HKBT vs QMIS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to QMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check QMIS's competition here
HKBT vs GSHN Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GSHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GSHN's competition here
HKBT vs KATX Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check KATX's competition here
HKBT vs CCYC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CCYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CCYC's competition here
HKBT vs ZSYC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ZSYC's competition here
HKBT vs WPCBF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WPCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WPCBF's competition here
HKBT vs NOTR Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NOTR's competition here
HKBT vs WCHS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WCHS's competition here
HKBT vs FZRO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to FZRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check FZRO's competition here
HKBT vs RGLG Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check RGLG's competition here
HKBT vs CINV Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CINV's competition here
HKBT vs DVTC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check DVTC's competition here
HKBT vs AMRR Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AMRR's competition here
HKBT vs KAST Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check KAST's competition here
HKBT vs SCGX Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check SCGX's competition here
HKBT vs GIPL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GIPL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GIPL's competition here
HKBT vs AOAO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AOAO's competition here
HKBT vs TGLO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while TGLO trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check TGLO's competition here
HKBT vs TRFE Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to TRFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check TRFE's competition here
HKBT vs NMTT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NMTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NMTT's competition here
HKBT vs RMGCF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check RMGCF's competition here
HKBT vs WAYS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WAYS's competition here
HKBT vs ATAQF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ATAQF's competition here
HKBT vs WWHC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WWHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WWHC's competition here
HKBT vs AASP Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AASP trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -27.41. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AASP's competition here
HKBT vs CHAAW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CHAAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CHAAW's competition here
HKBT vs AWCA Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AWCA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AWCA's competition here
HKBT vs CREEF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CREEF's competition here
HKBT vs XTPT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while XTPT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check XTPT's competition here
HKBT vs CMCAF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CMCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CMCAF's competition here
HKBT vs GWIN Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GWIN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GWIN's competition here
HKBT vs IDIG Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while IDIG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check IDIG's competition here
HKBT vs PTCP Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to PTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check PTCP's competition here
HKBT vs ATMS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ATMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ATMS's competition here
HKBT vs CAHO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CAHO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CAHO's competition here
HKBT vs GGAAF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GGAAF's competition here
HKBT vs JMTM Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check JMTM's competition here
HKBT vs KWAC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to KWAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check KWAC's competition here
HKBT vs KWACW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to KWACW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check KWACW's competition here
HKBT vs MDWK Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while MDWK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check MDWK's competition here
HKBT vs AVNI Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AVNI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -39.99. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AVNI's competition here
HKBT vs PMVCW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to PMVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check PMVCW's competition here
HKBT vs ATMH Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ATMH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ATMH's competition here
HKBT vs WBQNL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WBQNL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WBQNL's competition here
HKBT vs CNXX Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CNXX trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CNXX's competition here
HKBT vs ACBD Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ACBD's competition here
HKBT vs NPFC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NPFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NPFC's competition here
HKBT vs PCMC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while PCMC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check PCMC's competition here
HKBT vs CRSQ Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CRSQ's competition here
HKBT vs CBBB Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CBBB's competition here
HKBT vs ADCV Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ADCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ADCV's competition here
HKBT vs XCPT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while XCPT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check XCPT's competition here
HKBT vs EVTK Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while EVTK trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -375.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check EVTK's competition here
HKBT vs SSHT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while SSHT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check SSHT's competition here
HKBT vs GTVI Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GTVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GTVI's competition here
HKBT vs ECGR Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ECGR's competition here
HKBT vs SLTN Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while SLTN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to SLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check SLTN's competition here
HKBT vs USBL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check USBL's competition here
HKBT vs FBDS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, FBDS has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while FBDS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas FBDS's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBDS's ROE of +4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to FBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check FBDS's competition here
HKBT vs WRPT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WRPT's competition here
HKBT vs NIHL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NIHL's competition here
HKBT vs TCRI Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while TCRI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check TCRI's competition here
HKBT vs AZRH Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AZRH's competition here
HKBT vs ELLH Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ELLH trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ELLH's competition here
HKBT vs SIPN Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while SIPN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check SIPN's competition here
HKBT vs BOREF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while BOREF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check BOREF's competition here
HKBT vs STLY Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while STLY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check STLY's competition here
HKBT vs NHICW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NHICW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NHICW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NHICW's competition here
HKBT vs PSCO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while PSCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check PSCO's competition here
HKBT vs LWLW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to LWLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check LWLW's competition here
HKBT vs LNMG Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while LNMG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to LNMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check LNMG's competition here
HKBT vs AGSS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AGSS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AGSS's competition here
HKBT vs ITRX Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ITRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ITRX's competition here
HKBT vs USCTF Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while USCTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to USCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check USCTF's competition here
HKBT vs XITO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while XITO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check XITO's competition here
HKBT vs BDCM Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check BDCM's competition here
HKBT vs NGRC Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NGRC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NGRC's competition here
HKBT vs SITS Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while SITS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check SITS's competition here
HKBT vs CHYL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CHYL's competition here
HKBT vs FUNR Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check FUNR's competition here
HKBT vs NRCD Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check NRCD's competition here
HKBT vs WHLT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WHLT's competition here
HKBT vs LRGR Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while LRGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check LRGR's competition here
HKBT vs ASNB Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ASNB's competition here
HKBT vs MTRI Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check MTRI's competition here
HKBT vs FORW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check FORW's competition here
HKBT vs FWFW Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while FWFW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check FWFW's competition here
HKBT vs ETER Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ETER trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ETER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ETER's competition here
HKBT vs CDBT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check CDBT's competition here
HKBT vs XSVT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to XSVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check XSVT's competition here
HKBT vs GDVM Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check GDVM's competition here
HKBT vs HPIL Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check HPIL's competition here
HKBT vs WNFT Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check WNFT's competition here
HKBT vs ENGA Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to ENGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check ENGA's competition here
HKBT vs INOQ Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while INOQ trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check INOQ's competition here
HKBT vs HBIE Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while HBIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to HBIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check HBIE's competition here
HKBT vs MVCO Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, MVCO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while MVCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas MVCO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVCO's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to MVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check MVCO's competition here
HKBT vs IWSH Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while IWSH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to IWSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check IWSH's competition here
HKBT vs AVVH Comparison July 2025
HKBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKBT stands at 4M. In comparison, AVVH has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKBT is priced at $0.06, while AVVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKBT currently has a P/E ratio of 0.23, whereas AVVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKBT's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVVH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HKBT is more volatile compared to AVVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKBT.Check AVVH's competition here