Hilton Metal Forging Limited
Hilton Metal Forging Limited (HILTON.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HILTON.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HILTON.NS | ₹23.81 | +15.02% | 556.3M | 9.63 | ₹2.58 | N/A |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹15,062.55 | -3.53% | 224.8B | 333.31 | ₹44.98 | N/A |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹15,030.00 | -3.67% | 224.7B | 333.30 | ₹44.96 | N/A |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,141.15 | -0.82% | 129.1B | 49.02 | ₹42.34 | +0.16% |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,142.40 | -0.78% | 129.1B | 49.02 | ₹42.32 | +0.16% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,185.10 | +0.51% | 109.1B | 38.17 | ₹30.29 | +0.26% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,318.45 | -5.74% | 96.1B | 25.01 | ₹52.73 | +0.88% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,318.30 | -6.01% | 96B | 24.99 | ₹52.74 | +0.88% |
| KIRLFER.NS | ₹460.05 | +1.74% | 76.6B | 18.57 | ₹24.78 | +1.49% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹364.15 | +8.99% | 69.8B | 40.66 | ₹8.31 | +0.74% |
Stock Comparison
HILTON.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 224.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹15,062.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 333.31. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹15,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 333.30. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SANSERA.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,141.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SANSERA.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,142.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,185.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,318.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,318.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹364.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹363.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹367.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹424.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹250.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 62.83. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹250.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 62.93. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,240.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -123.93. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹2,674.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,657.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹736.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹738.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹417.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹418.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹288.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MMFL.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹404.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹403.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹1,308.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 79.25. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹100.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹99.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹120.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹612.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹617.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹809.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹808.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹481.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.54. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹480.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 90.63. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs TEMBO.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹577.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹357.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹2,848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹514.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 50.90. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 79.37. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹526.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹915.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹1,600.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -2882.35. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹116.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹47.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SKP.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SKP.NS trades at ₹148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SKP.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs JAINAM.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is -89.23. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹148.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MNKCMILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 49.86. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹458.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AEL.BO trades at ₹107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹103.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -32.77. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while MUL.BO trades at ₹8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DCM.BO trades at ₹61.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DCM.NS trades at ₹61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 251.14. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SMLT.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 785.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SMLT.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 785.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SMLT.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹148.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs PATTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, PATTECH.NS has a market cap of 700.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while PATTECH.NS trades at ₹94.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PATTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 70.51. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PATTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to PATTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check PATTECH.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -325.60. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 559.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -21.77. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹108.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 333.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 320.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹45.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
HILTON.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison April 2026
HILTON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.NS stands at 556.3M. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.NS is priced at ₹23.81, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HILTON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, HILTON.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.NS is more volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here