Hilton Metal Forging Limited

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 267.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹17,643.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 405.07. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 267B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹17,675.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 402.99. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,252.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.04. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,250.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.92. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,290.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,631.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,632.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹464.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check RHIM.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹464.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check RHIM.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹430.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹484.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹905.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹894.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹3,000.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,994.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,359.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -141.67. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹228.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 58.76. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹227.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹488.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SBCL.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹489.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SBCL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹488.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MMFL.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹488.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MMFL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹4,319.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹208.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,312.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 85.17. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AMIC.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹792.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ALICON.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹799.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ALICON.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹121.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹121.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹898.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹903.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹120.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹120.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹721.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹535.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹515.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 96.05. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SGIL.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹510.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 96.53. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SGIL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹3,200.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹332.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹543.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check CTCL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 82.41. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹932.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹61.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹60.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹143.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹142.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹2,052.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹451.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹162.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹161.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AEL.BO trades at ₹143.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AEL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹164.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹149.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹121.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DCM.NS trades at ₹83.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DCM.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹484.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DCM.BO trades at ₹83.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DCM.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹161.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹132.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while MUL.BO trades at ₹9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check MUL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 976.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹71.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SMLT.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 969.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹72.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SMLT.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 930.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹166.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 379.07. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 810.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹144.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 682.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is less volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹61.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -37.76. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 650.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹298.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -324.02. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹21.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check HILTON.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 430M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹120.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹40.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 290M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹83.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹48.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹47.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -26.70. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹7.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 79.60. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here

HILTON.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HILTON.BO stands at 476.8M. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HILTON.BO is priced at ₹21.06, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HILTON.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 7.97, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, HILTON.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HILTON.BO is more volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HILTON.BO.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here