Horizons Managed Global Opportunities ETF E
Horizons Managed Global Opportunities ETF E HGM.TO Peers
See (HGM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGM.TO | $11.35 | N/A | 1.02M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IGAF.TO | $15.13 | +0.20% | 3.19B | N/A | N/A | +0.87% |
| TEC.TO | $43.87 | +0.27% | 2.92B | 34.43 | $1.27 | +0.12% |
| XGD.TO | $29.72 | -0.77% | 1.69B | 19.83 | $1.50 | +0.66% |
| TGED.TO | $26.41 | -0.04% | 1.06B | 29.72 | $0.89 | +3.42% |
| DXG.TO | $65.60 | +0.02% | 676.66M | 29.33 | $2.24 | +12.46% |
| CIF.TO | $50.44 | -0.75% | 591.26M | 13.49 | $3.74 | +2.83% |
| FSF.TO | $32.81 | +0.71% | 562.82M | N/A | N/A | +1.17% |
| XHC.TO | $61.99 | -0.58% | 503.63M | 23.72 | $2.61 | +4.60% |
| XDG.TO | $27.53 | -0.38% | 458.33M | 17.23 | $1.60 | +2.98% |
Stock Comparison
HGM.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while IGAF.TO trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and IGAF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while TEC.TO trades at $43.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XGD.TO trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while TGED.TO trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 676.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while DXG.TO trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 591.26M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CIF.TO trades at $50.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 562.82M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while FSF.TO trades at $32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 503.63M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XHC.TO trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 458.33M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XDG.TO trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 367.93M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while TQGD.TO trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 361.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CINF.TO trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and CINF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 298.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and 0P0001ED1S.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 296.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CWW.TO trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 253.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while ZWG.TO trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 240.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while COW.TO trades at $67.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 224.38M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and 0P0001ODDT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 205.67M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CGR.TO trades at $30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 195.89M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while VMO.TO trades at $65.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 176.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while LIFE.TO trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 175.02M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while GDV.TO trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 150.91M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while ZGD.TO trades at $146.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 141.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CYH.TO trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 115.52M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XGI.TO trades at $57.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and XGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 104.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CGLO.TO trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while PMNT.TO trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 97.77M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XMY.TO trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 93.15M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XDGH.TO trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 79.49M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while TGRE.TO trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 64.36M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while XCD.TO trades at $59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 60.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while LONG.TO trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to LONG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 51.01M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while VVO.TO trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 48.51M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while ONEQ.TO trades at $43.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and ONEQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 45.83M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and 0P0001NDFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 44.98M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while GIQG.TO trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and GIQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 41.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while ESGG.TO trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 36.04M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while TGGR.TO trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 26.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while DXN.TO trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 22.42M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while HGGG.TO trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.28M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while VAH.TO trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 22.06M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while ZMT.TO trades at $67.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to ZMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 21.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and 0P0001N8LS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 21.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while CGAA.TO trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 19.43M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while MIVG.TO trades at $37.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and MIVG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 19.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while PINV.TO trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and PINV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while RWU.TO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and RWU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while VLQ.TO trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and VLQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.85M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while FLGD.TO trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and FLGD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while RIG.TO trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and RIG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while HRA.TO trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.17M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while RLD.TO trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and RLD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while SHZ.TO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and SHZ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 5.74M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while EATS.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and EATS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.32M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while DFD.TO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and DFD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 5.16M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while SOL.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.
HGM.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while HLTH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and HLTH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while DFE.TO trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO and DFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGM.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
HGM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGM.TO stands at 1.02M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.TO is priced at $11.35, while RLE.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGM.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.TO.