Handson Global Management (HGM) Limited

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 8.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,398.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TCS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 8.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,398.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TCS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,278.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check INFY.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,278.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check INFY.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,373.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,373.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹188.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹188.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,432.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TECHM.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,432.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TECHM.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,211.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check LTIM.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹4,209.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check LTIM.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 738.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹4,913.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 738.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹4,913.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 393.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,116.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 393.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,116.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 369.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,109.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 369.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,110.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 327.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,152.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check LTTS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 326B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,153.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check LTTS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 265.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹437.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check HEXT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹530.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹530.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 179.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹665.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, KPITTECH.BO has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while KPITTECH.BO trades at ₹664.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas KPITTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPITTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to KPITTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check KPITTECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 161B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹210.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 160.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹210.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while FSL.NS trades at ₹216.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check FSL.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while FSL.BO trades at ₹216.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check FSL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹1,458.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹1,461.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹544.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹544.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹346.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹347.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹227.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹227.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹398.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹399.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,432.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,430.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹686.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹689.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹638.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CAMS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹638.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CAMS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹251.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹251.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,088.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,089.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹2,314.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹496.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹496.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹600.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹606.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,137.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,139.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹1,168.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹1,169.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹117.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹117.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹165.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -48.29. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check AURUM.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹165.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -48.10. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check AURUM.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹21.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹250.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 53.30. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹883.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DSSL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹886.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DSSL.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹710.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹710.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 226.75. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MMWL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, BGDL.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while BGDL.BO trades at ₹88.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas BGDL.BO's P/E ratio is 321.50. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to BGDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check BGDL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹54.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹54.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.82. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 46.73. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹98.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ADSL.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹98.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ADSL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹341.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹342.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹161.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹161.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹232.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹231.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹302.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹302.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is 62.26. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹38.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.38. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹101.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹101.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹111.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, SOFTSOL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while SOFTSOL.BO trades at ₹197.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas SOFTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOFTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to SOFTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check SOFTSOL.BO's competition here

HGM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGM.NS stands at 678.2M. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGM.NS is priced at ₹53.27, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹76.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 158.38, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HGM.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HGM.NS is more volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here