Holcim Ltd
Holcim Ltd (HCMLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCMLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCMLY | $15.98 | +1.65% | 43.2B | 86.11 | $0.18 | +68.36% |
| HCPHY | $14.10 | +0.00% | 91B | 34.39 | $0.41 | N/A |
| HCMLF | $78.60 | -4.29% | 44.2B | 88.89 | $0.90 | +4.63% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.51% |
| HLBZF | $196.48 | -0.04% | 34B | 16.13 | $11.97 | +1.91% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 29.7B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.87% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +0.58% |
| AHCHY | $14.55 | +0.48% | 15.3B | 11.93 | $1.21 | +4.21% |
| CXMSF | $1.08 | -4.42% | 15.2B | 36.00 | $0.03 | +0.83% |
| AHCHF | $2.56 | +0.00% | 13.6B | 10.67 | $0.24 | +5.18% |
Stock Comparison
HCMLY vs HCPHY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to HCPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check HCPHY's competition here
HCMLY vs HCMLF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while HCMLF trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 88.89. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to HCMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check HCMLF's competition here
HCMLY vs CRHCF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CRHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CRHCF's competition here
HCMLY vs HLBZF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while HLBZF trades at $196.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check HLBZF's competition here
HCMLY vs UCLQF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to UCLQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check UCLQF's competition here
HCMLY vs GRSXY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to GRSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check GRSXY's competition here
HCMLY vs AHCHY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while AHCHY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check AHCHY's competition here
HCMLY vs CXMSF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CXMSF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to CXMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CXMSF's competition here
HCMLY vs AHCHF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while AHCHF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check AHCHF's competition here
HCMLY vs JHIUF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while JHIUF trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 97.25. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check JHIUF's competition here
HCMLY vs IMYSY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while IMYSY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to IMYSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check IMYSY's competition here
HCMLY vs BZZUF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BZZUF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BZZUF's competition here
HCMLY vs BZZUY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BZZUY trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BZZUY's competition here
HCMLY vs TGBMF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to TGBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check TGBMF's competition here
HCMLY vs XYIGF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while XYIGF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check XYIGF's competition here
HCMLY vs CBUMY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CBUMY trades at $34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CBUMY's competition here
HCMLY vs XYIGY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while XYIGY trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to XYIGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check XYIGY's competition here
HCMLY vs CBUMF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CBUMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CBUMF's competition here
HCMLY vs ADLDY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check ADLDY's competition here
HCMLY vs HDELY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check HDELY's competition here
HCMLY vs FCREY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check FCREY's competition here
HCMLY vs WBRBF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while WBRBF trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to WBRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check WBRBF's competition here
HCMLY vs BOALF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BOALF's competition here
HCMLY vs BOALY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BOALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BOALY's competition here
HCMLY vs SDCVF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while SDCVF trades at $83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check SDCVF's competition here
HCMLY vs GCWOF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while GCWOF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check GCWOF's competition here
HCMLY vs THYCY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while THYCY trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to THYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check THYCY's competition here
HCMLY vs WBRBY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while WBRBY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check WBRBY's competition here
HCMLY vs THYCF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while THYCF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check THYCF's competition here
HCMLY vs CMZOF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CMZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CMZOF's competition here
HCMLY vs BRKWF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BRKWF's competition here
HCMLY vs FRCEF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while FRCEF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check FRCEF's competition here
HCMLY vs IMYSF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while IMYSF trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check IMYSF's competition here
HCMLY vs WCHNF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while WCHNF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check WCHNF's competition here
HCMLY vs PITPF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PITPF's competition here
HCMLY vs ADBCF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to ADBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check ADBCF's competition here
HCMLY vs CARCY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CARCY trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CARCY's competition here
HCMLY vs CJRCF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CJRCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CJRCF's competition here
HCMLY vs CCGLF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CCGLF's competition here
HCMLY vs PSGTF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PSGTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PSGTF's competition here
HCMLY vs PTHIY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PTHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PTHIY's competition here
HCMLY vs PSGTY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PSGTY trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 155.50. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PSGTY's competition here
HCMLY vs PITPY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PITPY's competition here
HCMLY vs PTHIF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PTHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PTHIF's competition here
HCMLY vs SUCEF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while SUCEF trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check SUCEF's competition here
HCMLY vs BBMPY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BBMPY's competition here
HCMLY vs CMTOY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 752.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CMTOY trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CMTOY's competition here
HCMLY vs MCEM Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 678.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while MCEM trades at $258.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check MCEM's competition here
HCMLY vs IBJHF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 671M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while IBJHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check IBJHF's competition here
HCMLY vs CWXZF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CWXZF trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CWXZF's competition here
HCMLY vs CGCLF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 591.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CGCLF trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CGCLF's competition here
HCMLY vs PPCLY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 500.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PPCLY trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PPCLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PPCLY's competition here
HCMLY vs FTTRF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while FTTRF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to FTTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check FTTRF's competition here
HCMLY vs BHBSY Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BHBSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BHBSY's competition here
HCMLY vs CHYMF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CHYMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CHYMF's competition here
HCMLY vs TGAFF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while TGAFF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check TGAFF's competition here
HCMLY vs BSND Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BSND trades at $750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BSND's competition here
HCMLY vs BURCP Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BURCP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to BURCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BURCP's competition here
HCMLY vs SPPCF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to SPPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check SPPCF's competition here
HCMLY vs LKSGF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while LKSGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check LKSGF's competition here
HCMLY vs CTXXF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CTXXF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CTXXF's competition here
HCMLY vs RTGOF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to RTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check RTGOF's competition here
HCMLY vs ACPS Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while ACPS trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check ACPS's competition here
HCMLY vs ZHIXF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while ZHIXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to ZHIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check ZHIXF's competition here
HCMLY vs BASA Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while BASA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check BASA's competition here
HCMLY vs PNLT Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to PNLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check PNLT's competition here
HCMLY vs SNLP Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to SNLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check SNLP's competition here
HCMLY vs CHGS Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to CHGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check CHGS's competition here
HCMLY vs WWST Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to WWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check WWST's competition here
HCMLY vs AQCP Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to AQCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check AQCP's competition here
HCMLY vs LXRRF Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is more volatile compared to LXRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check LXRRF's competition here
HCMLY vs TJSS Comparison March 2026
HCMLY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLY stands at 43.2B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLY is priced at $15.98, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLY currently has a P/E ratio of 86.11, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLY's ROE is +0.86%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLY is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLY.Check TJSS's competition here