Holcim Ltd
Holcim Ltd HCMLF Peers
See (HCMLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCMLF | $74.28 | +2.91% | 40B | 11.57 | $6.42 | +5.00% |
| HCMLY | $24.33 | -1.06% | 67.5B | 18.84 | $1.30 | +2.81% |
| HLBZF | $237.34 | +3.04% | 41.5B | 21.31 | $11.14 | +1.56% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.58% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.81% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 22.8B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +1.28% |
| AHCHF | $2.89 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 13.76 | $0.21 | +3.39% |
| AHCHY | $12.70 | -0.33% | 16.2B | 12.02 | $1.06 | +3.70% |
| IMYSY | $5.74 | +0.00% | 14.1B | -22.96 | -$0.25 | +5.70% |
| JHIUF | $24.69 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 25.19 | $0.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HCMLF vs HCMLY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while HCMLY trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs HLBZF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while HLBZF trades at $237.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CRHCF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs UCLQF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and UCLQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs GRSXY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs AHCHF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs AHCHY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while AHCHY trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs IMYSY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and IMYSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs JHIUF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while JHIUF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CXMSF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CXMSF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CXMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs BZZUY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BZZUY trades at $27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs BZZUF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BZZUF trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs TGBMF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs ADLDY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs HDELY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs XYIGF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while XYIGF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CBUMF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs WBRBY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while WBRBY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs FCREY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs XYIGY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while XYIGY trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs BOALF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs BOALY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs WBRBF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs GCWOF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while GCWOF trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs SDCVF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while SDCVF trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs THYCF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while THYCF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs IMYSF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while IMYSF trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs THYCY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while THYCY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and THYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CMZOF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs BRKWF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs FRCEF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while FRCEF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs HCPHY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs PITPF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CARCY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CARCY trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 46.22. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CJRCF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CJRCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs ADBCF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CCGLF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs PITPY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PSGTF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PSGTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs WCHNF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while WCHNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PSGTY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PSGTY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PTHIF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs SUCEF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs IBJHF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CMTOY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 616.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CMTOY trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 394.67. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs MCEM Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 609.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while MCEM trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs CWXZF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 564M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CWXZF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CWXZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CGCLF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PPCLY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PPCLY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs TGAFF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while TGAFF trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to TGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs FTTRF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 381.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while FTTRF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to FTTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs BHBSY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CHYMF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CHYMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs BBMPY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs BSND Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BSND trades at $850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and BSND have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs BURCP Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CBUMY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CBUMY trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs SPPCF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs ZHIXF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and ZHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs RTGOF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CTXXF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CTXXF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PTHIY Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs BASA Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while BASA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs ACPS Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while ACPS trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to ACPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs LKSGF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while LKSGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs PNLT Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs SNLP Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and SNLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs CHGS Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs WWST Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs TJSS Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCMLF.
HCMLF vs LXRRF Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HCMLF vs AQCP Comparison
HCMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCMLF stands at 40B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HCMLF is priced at $74.28, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCMLF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.57, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HCMLF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCMLF and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).