Happy Belly Food Group Inc.
Happy Belly Food Group Inc. HBFG.CN Peers
See (HBFG.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBFG.CN | $1.13 | +7.62% | 143.15M | -56.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SAP.TO | $26.03 | -0.15% | 10.83B | -70.35 | -$0.37 | +2.91% |
| PBH.TO | $84.75 | +1.97% | 3.81B | 31.16 | $2.72 | +4.05% |
| MFI.TO | $26.99 | +1.01% | 3.34B | 34.60 | $0.78 | +3.33% |
| JWEL.TO | $33.90 | +1.19% | 1.41B | 28.49 | $1.19 | +2.41% |
| SOY.TO | $9.04 | +6.86% | 1.06B | -64.57 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| HLF.TO | $16.69 | +0.79% | 493.58M | 6.39 | $2.61 | +3.86% |
| BOIL.CN | $3.51 | +0.29% | 215.24M | -29.25 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| FRSH.CN | $0.85 | -5.56% | 44.35M | -6.54 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| SWP.TO | $3.09 | +0.65% | 29.41M | 23.77 | $0.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HBFG.CN vs SAP.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 10.83B. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while SAP.TO trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -70.35. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs PBH.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while PBH.TO trades at $84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs MFI.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while MFI.TO trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs JWEL.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while JWEL.TO trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs SOY.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while SOY.TO trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -64.57. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs HLF.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, HLF.TO has a market cap of 493.58M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while HLF.TO trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas HLF.TO's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to HLF.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to HLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs BOIL.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 215.24M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while BOIL.CN trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -29.25. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs FRSH.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.35M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while FRSH.CN trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to FRSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs SWP.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 29.41M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while SWP.TO trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is less volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs BU.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 26.64M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while BU.TO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs NPRA.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 12.50M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while NPRA.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs GFCO.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 11.36M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while GFCO.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs ELMT.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.65M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while ELMT.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs PNGA.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 9.03M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while PNGA.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs PSYC.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 5.78M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while PSYC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is less volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs BABY.TO Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 4.68M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while BABY.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is less volatile compared to BABY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs LLP.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.14M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while LLP.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to LLP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs EMRG.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.92M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while EMRG.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to EMRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs MOOO.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while MOOO.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs BITE.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while BITE.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to BITE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs CULT.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while CULT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is less volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs MEAT.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while MEAT.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to MEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs PLBL.NE Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948750.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while PLBL.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to PLBL.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs VEGI.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699735.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while VEGI.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to VEGI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs FIT.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473648.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while FIT.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to FIT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs VAGN.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436888.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while VAGN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to VAGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs YUM.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349884.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while YUM.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to YUM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs ARTO.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326112.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while ARTO.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to ARTO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs VEJI.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271554.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while VEJI.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of -42.78%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HBFG.CN has daily volatility of 9.26 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
HBFG.CN vs MEAL.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242129.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while MEAL.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to MEAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.
HBFG.CN vs FUEL.CN Comparison
HBFG.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBFG.CN stands at 143.15M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179690.00. Regarding current trading prices, HBFG.CN is priced at $1.13, while FUEL.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBFG.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -56.50, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HBFG.CN's ROE is -1.39%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HBFG.CN is more volatile compared to FUEL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBFG.CN.