The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd.
The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. (HACBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HACBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACBY | $27.39 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 17.12 | $1.60 | +2.32% |
| TMBBY | $9.05 | +0.00% | 873.2B | 7.94 | $1.14 | +11.31% |
| BKAYY | $26.00 | +0.00% | 191.2B | 10.36 | $2.51 | +2.63% |
| CIHHF | $6.52 | +6.89% | 164.4B | 7.76 | $0.84 | +6.26% |
| CIHKY | $30.32 | +0.17% | 154.4B | 7.31 | $4.19 | +2.32% |
| DBSDY | $187.93 | +1.19% | 133.5B | 15.55 | $12.09 | +6.37% |
| DBSDF | $48.72 | +4.95% | 132.7B | 15.49 | $3.02 | +2.99% |
| UNCRY | $41.77 | +1.26% | 125.3B | 9.77 | $4.28 | +4.39% |
| UNCFF | $83.40 | -0.33% | 122B | 9.74 | $8.56 | +4.39% |
| BNPQF | $108.98 | +0.91% | 119.9B | 8.75 | $12.45 | +7.73% |
Stock Comparison
HACBY vs TMBBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TMBBY has a market cap of 873.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while TMBBY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TMBBY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMBBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to TMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check TMBBY's competition here
HACBY vs BKAYY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKAYY trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKAYY's competition here
HACBY vs CIHHF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CIHHF trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CIHHF's competition here
HACBY vs CIHKY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 154.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CIHKY trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CIHKY's competition here
HACBY vs DBSDY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DBSDY trades at $187.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DBSDY's competition here
HACBY vs DBSDF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DBSDF trades at $48.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DBSDF's competition here
HACBY vs UNCRY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while UNCRY trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check UNCRY's competition here
HACBY vs UNCFF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while UNCFF trades at $83.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check UNCFF's competition here
HACBY vs BNPQF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BNPQF trades at $108.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BNPQF's competition here
HACBY vs BNPQY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BNPQY trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BNPQY's competition here
HACBY vs IITSF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while IITSF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check IITSF's competition here
HACBY vs BDOUF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BDOUF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BDOUF's competition here
HACBY vs MZHOF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MZHOF trades at $44.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MZHOF's competition here
HACBY vs KBCSY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while KBCSY trades at $66.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check KBCSY's competition here
HACBY vs SBKFF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SBKFF trades at $102.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SBKFF's competition here
HACBY vs EBKDY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while EBKDY trades at $56.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check EBKDY's competition here
HACBY vs CAIXY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CAIXY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CAIXY's competition here
HACBY vs CIXPF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CIXPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CIXPF's competition here
HACBY vs OVCHF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while OVCHF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check OVCHF's competition here
HACBY vs OVCHY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while OVCHY trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check OVCHY's competition here
HACBY vs PSBKF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PSBKF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PSBKF's competition here
HACBY vs PSTVY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PSTVY has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PSTVY trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PSTVY's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSTVY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PSTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PSTVY's competition here
HACBY vs LLDTF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while LLDTF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check LLDTF's competition here
HACBY vs CHCJY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CHCJY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CHCJY's competition here
HACBY vs AKSJF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check AKSJF's competition here
HACBY vs LLOBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while LLOBF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check LLOBF's competition here
HACBY vs JPPTY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while JPPTY trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check JPPTY's competition here
HACBY vs BHKLY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BHKLY trades at $119.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BHKLY's competition here
HACBY vs JPSTF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while JPSTF trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check JPSTF's competition here
HACBY vs NRDBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while NRDBY trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check NRDBY's competition here
HACBY vs BNKHF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BNKHF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BNKHF's competition here
HACBY vs NBNKF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while NBNKF trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check NBNKF's competition here
HACBY vs CRARY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CRARY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CRARY's competition here
HACBY vs CRARF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CRARF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CRARF's competition here
HACBY vs CHBJF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CHBJF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CHBJF's competition here
HACBY vs SCGLY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SCGLY trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SCGLY's competition here
HACBY vs SCGLF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SCGLF trades at $78.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SCGLF's competition here
HACBY vs KBCSF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while KBCSF trades at $140.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check KBCSF's competition here
HACBY vs UOVEY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while UOVEY trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check UOVEY's competition here
HACBY vs UOVEF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while UOVEF trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check UOVEF's competition here
HACBY vs CRZBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CRZBY trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CRZBY's competition here
HACBY vs CRZBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CRZBF trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CRZBF's competition here
HACBY vs STNDF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check STNDF's competition here
HACBY vs DNBBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DNBBF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DNBBF's competition here
HACBY vs EBKOF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while EBKOF trades at $115.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check EBKOF's competition here
HACBY vs DNBBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DNBBY trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DNBBY's competition here
HACBY vs PBCRY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PBCRY trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PBCRY's competition here
HACBY vs DNSKF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DNSKF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DNSKF's competition here
HACBY vs DNKEY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while DNKEY trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check DNKEY's competition here
HACBY vs OTPBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while OTPBF trades at $147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check OTPBF's competition here
HACBY vs SWDBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SWDBY trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SWDBY's competition here
HACBY vs SWDBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SWDBF trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SWDBF's competition here
HACBY vs PBCRF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PBCRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PBCRF's competition here
HACBY vs SVKEF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SVKEF trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SVKEF's competition here
HACBY vs BLMIF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BLMIF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BLMIF's competition here
HACBY vs HSNGY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while HSNGY trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check HSNGY's competition here
HACBY vs MLYBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MLYBY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MLYBY's competition here
HACBY vs BKHYY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKHYY trades at $137.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKHYY's competition here
HACBY vs BKHPF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKHPF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKHPF's competition here
HACBY vs GBOOY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while GBOOY trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check GBOOY's competition here
HACBY vs PSZKY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PSZKY trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PSZKY's competition here
HACBY vs JPPHY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while JPPHY trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check JPPHY's competition here
HACBY vs MLYNF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MLYNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MLYNF's competition here
HACBY vs JPHLF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while JPHLF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check JPHLF's competition here
HACBY vs PSZKF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PSZKF trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PSZKF's competition here
HACBY vs GBOOF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while GBOOF trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check GBOOF's competition here
HACBY vs CKHGY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CKHGY trades at $130.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CKHGY's competition here
HACBY vs SGBLY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SGBLY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SGBLY's competition here
HACBY vs HSNGF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while HSNGF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check HSNGF's competition here
HACBY vs SBGOF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SBGOF trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SBGOF's competition here
HACBY vs RSNHF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while RSNHF trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check RSNHF's competition here
HACBY vs CKHGF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CKHGF trades at $247.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CKHGF's competition here
HACBY vs BKRKF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKRKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKRKF's competition here
HACBY vs BKRKY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKRKY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKRKY's competition here
HACBY vs SUTNY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while SUTNY trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check SUTNY's competition here
HACBY vs BPXXY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BPXXY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BPXXY's competition here
HACBY vs CMTDF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CMTDF trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CMTDF's competition here
HACBY vs PPERF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PPERF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PPERF's competition here
HACBY vs CEBCF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CEBCF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CEBCF's competition here
HACBY vs AIBGY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while AIBGY trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check AIBGY's competition here
HACBY vs PPERY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PPERY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PPERY's competition here
HACBY vs BDORY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BDORY trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BDORY's competition here
HACBY vs AIBRF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while AIBRF trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check AIBRF's competition here
HACBY vs BNCZF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BNCZF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BNCZF's competition here
HACBY vs CGMBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CGMBF's competition here
HACBY vs CIMDF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CIMDF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CIMDF's competition here
HACBY vs MDIBY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MDIBY trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MDIBY's competition here
HACBY vs MZTFF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MZTFF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MZTFF trades at $75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MZTFF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MZTFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to MZTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MZTFF's competition here
HACBY vs ISNPY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while ISNPY trades at $40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check ISNPY's competition here
HACBY vs CMAKY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while CMAKY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check CMAKY's competition here
HACBY vs MDIBF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while MDIBF trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check MDIBF's competition here
HACBY vs BKRIY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKRIY trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKRIY's competition here
HACBY vs PBLOF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check PBLOF's competition here
HACBY vs FCNCB Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while FCNCB trades at $1,624.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check FCNCB's competition here
HACBY vs RAIFY Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RAIFY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while RAIFY trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RAIFY's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAIFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to RAIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check RAIFY's competition here
HACBY vs BKRIF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKRIF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKRIF's competition here
HACBY vs EGFEF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while EGFEF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check EGFEF's competition here
HACBY vs RAIFF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RAIFF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while RAIFF trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RAIFF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAIFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to RAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check RAIFF's competition here
HACBY vs BKZHF Comparison May 2026
HACBY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HACBY stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKZHF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HACBY is priced at $27.39, while BKZHF trades at $166.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HACBY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BKZHF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, HACBY's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKZHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HACBY is more volatile compared to BKZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HACBY.Check BKZHF's competition here