Hwa AG
Hwa AG (H9W.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (H9W.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H9W.DE | €3.07 | +0.33% | 30M | -1.43 | -€2.14 | N/A |
| CON.DE | €73.34 | +0.52% | 14.7B | 12.55 | €5.84 | +3.41% |
| KBX.DE | €86.55 | +2.06% | 13.9B | 32.93 | €2.61 | +2.04% |
| HLE.DE | €87.00 | +0.69% | 9.7B | 50.00 | €1.74 | +1.09% |
| SHA0.DE | €4.60 | -5.20% | 4.6B | -4.39 | -€1.12 | +5.09% |
| SHA.DE | €4.58 | +3.79% | 3B | 10.17 | €0.45 | N/A |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | N/A |
| SFQ.DE | €16.10 | +4.41% | 728.1M | 11.38 | €1.41 | +5.30% |
| ZIL2.DE | €4.40 | +1.62% | 277.2M | -1.88 | -€2.33 | +3.43% |
Stock Comparison
H9W.DE vs CON.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, CON.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while CON.DE trades at €73.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CON.DE's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CON.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to CON.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check CON.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while KBX.DE trades at €86.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check KBX.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while HLE.DE trades at €87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check HLE.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while SHA0.DE trades at €4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check SHA0.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while SHA.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check SHA.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check GTR.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check VTSC.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 728.1M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while SFQ.DE trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check SFQ.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while ZIL2.DE trades at €4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check ZIL2.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs BDT.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, BDT.DE has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while BDT.DE trades at €19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BDT.DE's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BDT.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to BDT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check BDT.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while NVM.DE trades at €3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check NVM.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while ED4.DE trades at €6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check ED4.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs PSQ.F Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, PSQ.F has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while PSQ.F trades at €0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PSQ.F's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PSQ.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to PSQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check PSQ.F's competition here
H9W.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while GMM.DE trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check GMM.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while PWO.DE trades at €29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check PWO.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while VBX.DE trades at €4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -20.70. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check VBX.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs VBX.F Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, VBX.F has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while VBX.F trades at €4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VBX.F's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VBX.F's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check VBX.F's competition here
H9W.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while P4N.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check P4N.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check MSAG.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs DEX.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, DEX.DE has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while DEX.DE trades at €2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas DEX.DE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DEX.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to DEX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check DEX.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while SF3.DE trades at €3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check SF3.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while HGEA.DE trades at €1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check HGEA.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs C0M.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, C0M.DE has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while C0M.DE trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas C0M.DE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to C0M.DE's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to C0M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check C0M.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while PGN.DE trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check PGN.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while IS7.DE trades at €2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check IS7.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check SD1.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is less volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check TINC.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs DAI.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, DAI.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while DAI.DE trades at €70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas DAI.DE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DAI.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to DAI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check DAI.DE's competition here
H9W.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison August 2025
H9W.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H9W.DE stands at 30M. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H9W.DE is priced at €3.07, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H9W.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H9W.DE's ROE is -1.18%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H9W.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H9W.DE.Check OSR.DE's competition here