Compleo Charging Solutions AG
Compleo Charging Solutions AG (C0M.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (C0M.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C0M.DE | €2.82 | +0.00% | 18.2M | -0.45 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| KBX.DE | €101.25 | -0.74% | 16.4B | 37.88 | €2.69 | +1.86% |
| CON.DE | €66.78 | +1.64% | 13.3B | -30.30 | -€2.19 | +4.07% |
| SHA0.DE | €9.10 | +1.90% | 8.4B | -6.14 | -€1.45 | N/A |
| HLE.DE | €70.90 | -0.70% | 7.9B | 48.56 | €1.46 | +0.31% |
| AMV0.DE | €34.95 | +0.58% | 3.5B | -5.84 | -€5.95 | N/A |
| SHA.DE | €4.58 | +3.79% | 3B | 10.17 | €0.45 | N/A |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | N/A |
| SFQ.DE | €19.24 | +0.94% | 869.8M | 17.11 | €1.12 | +4.44% |
Stock Comparison
C0M.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while KBX.DE trades at €101.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check KBX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs CON.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, CON.DE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while CON.DE trades at €66.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas CON.DE's P/E ratio is -30.30. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to CON.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to CON.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check CON.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SHA0.DE trades at €9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SHA0.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while HLE.DE trades at €70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check HLE.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs AMV0.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, AMV0.DE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while AMV0.DE trades at €34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas AMV0.DE's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to AMV0.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to AMV0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check AMV0.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SHA.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SHA.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check GTR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VTSC.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 869.8M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SFQ.DE trades at €19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SFQ.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while ZIL2.DE trades at €5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check ZIL2.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PSQ.F Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PSQ.F has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PSQ.F trades at €0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PSQ.F's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PSQ.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PSQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PSQ.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while GMM.DE trades at €8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check GMM.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while NVM.DE trades at €2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check NVM.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs BDT.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, BDT.DE has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while BDT.DE trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas BDT.DE's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to BDT.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to BDT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check BDT.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VBX.F Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VBX.F has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VBX.F trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VBX.F's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VBX.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VBX.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VBX.DE trades at €4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VBX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs VOTR.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VOTR.DE has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while VOTR.DE trades at €3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas VOTR.DE's P/E ratio is -17.48. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to VOTR.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to VOTR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check VOTR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while ED4.DE trades at €3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check ED4.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PWO.DE trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PWO.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while P4N.DE trades at €3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check P4N.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check MSAG.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs DEX.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, DEX.DE has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while DEX.DE trades at €2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DEX.DE's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to DEX.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to DEX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check DEX.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs H9W.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, H9W.DE has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while H9W.DE trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas H9W.DE's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to H9W.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to H9W.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check H9W.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SF3.DE trades at €3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SF3.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while HGEA.DE trades at €0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check HGEA.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while IS7.DE trades at €1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check IS7.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while PGN.DE trades at €1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check PGN.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check SD1.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check TINC.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs IQL.F Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, IQL.F has a market cap of 425.4K. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while IQL.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas IQL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to IQL.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to IQL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check IQL.F's competition here
C0M.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check OSR.DE's competition here
C0M.DE vs DAI.DE Comparison May 2026
C0M.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C0M.DE stands at 18.2M. In comparison, DAI.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C0M.DE is priced at €2.82, while DAI.DE trades at €70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C0M.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.45, whereas DAI.DE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, C0M.DE's ROE is -2.18%, compared to DAI.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C0M.DE is more volatile compared to DAI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C0M.DE.Check DAI.DE's competition here