H2APEX Group SCA
H2APEX Group SCA (H2A.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (H2A.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2A.DE | €1.05 | +1.94% | 52.7M | -1.31 | -€0.80 | N/A |
| LIN.DE | €421.60 | -1.45% | 195.4B | 32.71 | €12.89 | +1.23% |
| AIL.DE | €176.58 | -2.76% | 102B | 29.93 | €5.90 | +1.82% |
| 1COV.DE | €59.90 | +0.00% | 12.4B | -17.67 | -€3.39 | N/A |
| 1COV.F | €59.80 | +0.00% | 12.4B | -17.64 | -€3.39 | N/A |
| SY1.DE | €73.76 | -2.82% | 10.3B | 41.44 | €1.78 | +1.58% |
| BNR.DE | €61.34 | -0.90% | 8.9B | 33.52 | €1.83 | +3.39% |
| EVK.DE | €17.05 | -2.40% | 7.9B | 29.91 | €0.57 | +6.70% |
| TCM1.F | €6.05 | -6.92% | 7.3B | 19.52 | €0.31 | +2.03% |
| FPE3.DE | €38.18 | -4.17% | 5B | 17.04 | €2.24 | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
H2A.DE vs LIN.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, LIN.DE has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while LIN.DE trades at €421.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas LIN.DE's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LIN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to LIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check LIN.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs AIL.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, AIL.DE has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while AIL.DE trades at €176.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas AIL.DE's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIL.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to AIL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check AIL.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs 1COV.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, 1COV.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while 1COV.DE trades at €59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas 1COV.DE's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1COV.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to 1COV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check 1COV.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs 1COV.F Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, 1COV.F has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while 1COV.F trades at €59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas 1COV.F's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1COV.F's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to 1COV.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check 1COV.F's competition here
H2A.DE vs SY1.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, SY1.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while SY1.DE trades at €73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas SY1.DE's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SY1.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to SY1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check SY1.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs BNR.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, BNR.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while BNR.DE trades at €61.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas BNR.DE's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNR.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to BNR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check BNR.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs EVK.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, EVK.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while EVK.DE trades at €17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas EVK.DE's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVK.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is less volatile compared to EVK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check EVK.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs TCM1.F Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, TCM1.F has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while TCM1.F trades at €6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas TCM1.F's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCM1.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to TCM1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check TCM1.F's competition here
H2A.DE vs FPE3.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, FPE3.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while FPE3.DE trades at €38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas FPE3.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FPE3.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to FPE3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check FPE3.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs WCH.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, WCH.DE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while WCH.DE trades at €93.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas WCH.DE's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WCH.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to WCH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check WCH.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs FPE.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, FPE.DE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while FPE.DE trades at €31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas FPE.DE's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FPE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to FPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check FPE.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs VBK.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, VBK.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while VBK.DE trades at €35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas VBK.DE's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VBK.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is less volatile compared to VBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check VBK.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs ACT.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, ACT.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while ACT.DE trades at €162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas ACT.DE's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACT.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is less volatile compared to ACT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check ACT.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs LXS.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, LXS.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while LXS.DE trades at €17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas LXS.DE's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LXS.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is less volatile compared to LXS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check LXS.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs CE2.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CE2.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while CE2.DE trades at €11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas CE2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CE2.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to CE2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check CE2.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs UZU.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, UZU.DE has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while UZU.DE trades at €69.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas UZU.DE's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UZU.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to UZU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check UZU.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs MZX.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, MZX.DE has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while MZX.DE trades at €14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas MZX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MZX.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to MZX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check MZX.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs NTG.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, NTG.DE has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while NTG.DE trades at €10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas NTG.DE's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTG.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, H2A.DE is more volatile compared to NTG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2A.DE.Check NTG.DE's competition here
H2A.DE vs APD.DE Comparison May 2026
H2A.DE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, H2A.DE stands at 52.7M. In comparison, APD.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H2A.DE is priced at €1.05, while APD.DE trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
H2A.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.31, whereas APD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H2A.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. H2A.DE has daily volatility of 3.74 and APD.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check APD.DE's competition here