Joway Health Industries Group Inc.
Joway Health Industries Group Inc. (GTVI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTVI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTVI | $0.07 | +4.43% | 15.3M | -3.65 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GTVI vs QMIS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QMIS's competition here
GTVI vs GSHN Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSHN's competition here
GTVI vs KATX Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check KATX's competition here
GTVI vs CCYC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCYC's competition here
GTVI vs ZSYC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ZSYC's competition here
GTVI vs WPCBF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPCBF's competition here
GTVI vs NOTR Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check NOTR's competition here
GTVI vs WCHS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check WCHS's competition here
GTVI vs FZRO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZRO's competition here
GTVI vs RGLG Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check RGLG's competition here
GTVI vs CINV Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CINV's competition here
GTVI vs DVTC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVTC's competition here
GTVI vs AMRR Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRR's competition here
GTVI vs KAST Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check KAST's competition here
GTVI vs SCGX Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check SCGX's competition here
GTVI vs GIPL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while GIPL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check GIPL's competition here
GTVI vs AOAO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check AOAO's competition here
GTVI vs TGLO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while TGLO trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check TGLO's competition here
GTVI vs TRFE Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRFE's competition here
GTVI vs NMTT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMTT's competition here
GTVI vs RMGCF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check RMGCF's competition here
GTVI vs WAYS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAYS's competition here
GTVI vs ATAQF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ATAQF's competition here
GTVI vs WWHC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWHC's competition here
GTVI vs AASP Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AASP trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -27.41. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check AASP's competition here
GTVI vs CHAAW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHAAW's competition here
GTVI vs AWCA Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AWCA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check AWCA's competition here
GTVI vs CREEF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CREEF's competition here
GTVI vs XTPT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while XTPT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check XTPT's competition here
GTVI vs CMCAF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCAF's competition here
GTVI vs GWIN Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while GWIN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWIN's competition here
GTVI vs IDIG Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while IDIG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check IDIG's competition here
GTVI vs PTCP Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCP's competition here
GTVI vs ATMS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATMS's competition here
GTVI vs CAHO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CAHO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CAHO's competition here
GTVI vs GGAAF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check GGAAF's competition here
GTVI vs JMTM Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check JMTM's competition here
GTVI vs KWACW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWACW's competition here
GTVI vs KWAC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWAC's competition here
GTVI vs MDWK Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while MDWK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check MDWK's competition here
GTVI vs AVNI Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AVNI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -39.99. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and AVNI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVNI's competition here
GTVI vs PMVCW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and PMVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMVCW's competition here
GTVI vs ATMH Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ATMH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ATMH's competition here
GTVI vs WBQNL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WBQNL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check WBQNL's competition here
GTVI vs CNXX Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CNXX trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CNXX's competition here
GTVI vs ACBD Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ACBD's competition here
GTVI vs NPFC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPFC's competition here
GTVI vs PCMC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while PCMC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check PCMC's competition here
GTVI vs CRSQ Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CRSQ's competition here
GTVI vs CBBB Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CBBB's competition here
GTVI vs ADCV Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCV's competition here
GTVI vs XCPT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while XCPT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and XCPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XCPT's competition here
GTVI vs EVTK Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while EVTK trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -375.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check EVTK's competition here
GTVI vs SSHT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while SSHT trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check SSHT's competition here
GTVI vs ECGR Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ECGR's competition here
GTVI vs SLTN Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while SLTN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLTN's competition here
GTVI vs USBL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check USBL's competition here
GTVI vs FBDS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FBDS has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while FBDS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas FBDS's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to FBDS's ROE of +4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to FBDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check FBDS's competition here
GTVI vs WRPT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check WRPT's competition here
GTVI vs NIHL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check NIHL's competition here
GTVI vs TCRI Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while TCRI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check TCRI's competition here
GTVI vs AZRH Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check AZRH's competition here
GTVI vs ELLH Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ELLH trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ELLH's competition here
GTVI vs SIPN Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while SIPN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to SIPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and SIPN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIPN's competition here
GTVI vs BOREF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while BOREF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOREF's competition here
GTVI vs STLY Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while STLY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check STLY's competition here
GTVI vs NHICW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NHICW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to NHICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check NHICW's competition here
GTVI vs PSCO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while PSCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check PSCO's competition here
GTVI vs LWLW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LWLW's competition here
GTVI vs LNMG Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while LNMG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and LNMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNMG's competition here
GTVI vs AGSS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AGSS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check AGSS's competition here
GTVI vs ITRX Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ITRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITRX's competition here
GTVI vs USCTF Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while USCTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to USCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check USCTF's competition here
GTVI vs XITO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while XITO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check XITO's competition here
GTVI vs BDCM Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check BDCM's competition here
GTVI vs NGRC Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NGRC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and NGRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGRC's competition here
GTVI vs SITS Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while SITS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check SITS's competition here
GTVI vs CHYL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CHYL's competition here
GTVI vs FUNR Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check FUNR's competition here
GTVI vs NRCD Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check NRCD's competition here
GTVI vs WHLT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check WHLT's competition here
GTVI vs LRGR Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while LRGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check LRGR's competition here
GTVI vs ASNB Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ASNB's competition here
GTVI vs MTRI Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check MTRI's competition here
GTVI vs FORW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check FORW's competition here
GTVI vs FWFW Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while FWFW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check FWFW's competition here
GTVI vs ETER Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ETER trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to ETER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check ETER's competition here
GTVI vs CDBT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check CDBT's competition here
GTVI vs HKBT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check HKBT's competition here
GTVI vs XSVT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSVT's competition here
GTVI vs GDVM Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check GDVM's competition here
GTVI vs HPIL Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check HPIL's competition here
GTVI vs WNFT Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check WNFT's competition here
GTVI vs ENGA Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGA's competition here
GTVI vs INOQ Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while INOQ trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check INOQ's competition here
GTVI vs HBIE Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while HBIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and HBIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HBIE's competition here
GTVI vs MVCO Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, MVCO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while MVCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas MVCO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to MVCO's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to MVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check MVCO's competition here
GTVI vs IWSH Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while IWSH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI is less volatile compared to IWSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTVI.Check IWSH's competition here
GTVI vs AVVH Comparison July 2025
GTVI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTVI stands at 15.3M. In comparison, AVVH has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTVI is priced at $0.07, while AVVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTVI currently has a P/E ratio of -3.65, whereas AVVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTVI's ROE is +1.43%, compared to AVVH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GTVI and AVVH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVVH's competition here