Indiana Resources Limited
Indiana Resources Limited (GSMGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GSMGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSMGF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 15.2M | 0.21 | $0.11 | +274.58% |
| FNLPF | $52.04 | -1.67% | 39.4B | 86.13 | $0.62 | +1.67% |
| ANGPY | $15.19 | -4.91% | 25.5B | 323.87 | $0.05 | +3.55% |
| IMPUY | $17.24 | -5.95% | 17B | 378.00 | $0.05 | +0.50% |
| IMPUF | $17.15 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.53% |
| MMSMY | $39.00 | -5.34% | 11.6B | 37.99 | $1.07 | +0.45% |
| JINFF | $24.60 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 24.37 | $1.03 | +0.32% |
| GMINF | $35.55 | -1.66% | 8.4B | 32.51 | $1.13 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | -28.60% | 7.5B | 24.47 | $5.33 | +0.98% |
| OICT | $11.50 | +14.43% | 6.3B | -39.25 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GSMGF vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while FNLPF trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 86.13. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check FNLPF's competition here
GSMGF vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ANGPY trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 323.87. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ANGPY's competition here
GSMGF vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 378.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check IMPUY's competition here
GSMGF vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while IMPUF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and IMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPUF's competition here
GSMGF vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while MMSMY trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check MMSMY's competition here
GSMGF vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while JINFF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check JINFF's competition here
GSMGF vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while GMINF trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check GMINF's competition here
GSMGF vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and XZJCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XZJCF's competition here
GSMGF vs OICT Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while OICT trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and OICT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OICT's competition here
GSMGF vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and NMPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMPNF's competition here
GSMGF vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and ZMPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMPLF's competition here
GSMGF vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ABBRF trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -107.18. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ABBRF's competition here
GSMGF vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and POYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POYYF's competition here
GSMGF vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 933.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while GLGDF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check GLGDF's competition here
GSMGF vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check AUCOY's competition here
GSMGF vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and TIHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIHRF's competition here
GSMGF vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and FCSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCSUF's competition here
GSMGF vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 463M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while BKRRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check BKRRF's competition here
GSMGF vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 403.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SAPLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SAPLF's competition here
GSMGF vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SLVTF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SLVTF's competition here
GSMGF vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and IAUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAUFF's competition here
GSMGF vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while BRVMF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -102.42. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check BRVMF's competition here
GSMGF vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check TPRFF's competition here
GSMGF vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while HGLD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check HGLD's competition here
GSMGF vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 281.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check GOTRF's competition here
GSMGF vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SMDRF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SMDRF's competition here
GSMGF vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CHPGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -81.25. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check CHPGF's competition here
GSMGF vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check PAASF's competition here
GSMGF vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 241.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SSVFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -29.93. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SSVFF's competition here
GSMGF vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CAPTF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -172.90. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check CAPTF's competition here
GSMGF vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ORVMF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ORVMF's competition here
GSMGF vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TBXXF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check TBXXF's competition here
GSMGF vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and BOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOCOF's competition here
GSMGF vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SNNGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SNNGF's competition here
GSMGF vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and XANAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XANAF's competition here
GSMGF vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and PLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLLHF's competition here
GSMGF vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while OCGSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check OCGSF's competition here
GSMGF vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while NAUFF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check NAUFF's competition here
GSMGF vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while EMPYF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check EMPYF's competition here
GSMGF vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SCTSF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SCTSF's competition here
GSMGF vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while AGLDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check AGLDF's competition here
GSMGF vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check CTNXF's competition here
GSMGF vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -273.80. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SDRC's competition here
GSMGF vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TSORF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check TSORF's competition here
GSMGF vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check LUCRF's competition here
GSMGF vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PGLDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check PGLDF's competition here
GSMGF vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while LGCXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check LGCXF's competition here
GSMGF vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TEUTF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check TEUTF's competition here
GSMGF vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while AMNP trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and AMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMNP's competition here
GSMGF vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while DNCVF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check DNCVF's competition here
GSMGF vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ACRG trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and ACRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRG's competition here
GSMGF vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while VIPRF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check VIPRF's competition here
GSMGF vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ELRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ELRFF's competition here
GSMGF vs THMG Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while THMG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.32. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check THMG's competition here
GSMGF vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while AGMRF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check AGMRF's competition here
GSMGF vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while VLMGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check VLMGF's competition here
GSMGF vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and HEGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HEGLF's competition here
GSMGF vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while LBCMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check LBCMF's competition here
GSMGF vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while KDKCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check KDKCF's competition here
GSMGF vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ARRKF's competition here
GSMGF vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while MMNGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check MMNGF's competition here
GSMGF vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CPPMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check CPPMF's competition here
GSMGF vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while EQMEF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -30.70. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check EQMEF's competition here
GSMGF vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while BRGC trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check BRGC's competition here
GSMGF vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and EMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMPPF's competition here
GSMGF vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SMOFF's competition here
GSMGF vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ACKRF's competition here
GSMGF vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and PDLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDLMF's competition here
GSMGF vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and VTXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTXXF's competition here
GSMGF vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ATEPF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -22.05. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ATEPF's competition here
GSMGF vs BBBXF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while BBBXF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check BBBXF's competition here
GSMGF vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check CTMCF's competition here
GSMGF vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while KGFMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check KGFMF's competition here
GSMGF vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while DNRSF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check DNRSF's competition here
GSMGF vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and ADYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADYRF's competition here
GSMGF vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while DYNR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and DYNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DYNR's competition here
GSMGF vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and RKHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKHNF's competition here
GSMGF vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PNTRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and PNTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNTRF's competition here
GSMGF vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while PVGDF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check PVGDF's competition here
GSMGF vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SSVRF's competition here
GSMGF vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while MRZLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and MRZLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRZLF's competition here
GSMGF vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and HMRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMRRF's competition here
GSMGF vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and CJIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CJIMF's competition here
GSMGF vs RITE Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check RITE's competition here
GSMGF vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while WEXPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check WEXPF's competition here
GSMGF vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check OKPRF's competition here
GSMGF vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while WAMFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check WAMFF's competition here
GSMGF vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and TLSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSMF's competition here
GSMGF vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SUNPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.70. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and SUNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUNPF's competition here
GSMGF vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GSMGF has daily volatility of 0.00 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
GSMGF vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check GLDRF's competition here
GSMGF vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and ASLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASLRF's competition here
GSMGF vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while STRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check STRFF's competition here
GSMGF vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +15.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check SBMCF's competition here
GSMGF vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF and SHGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGDF's competition here
GSMGF vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while ESGLF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check ESGLF's competition here
GSMGF vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check AUCUF's competition here
GSMGF vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check URVNF's competition here
GSMGF vs HBEIF Comparison February 2026
GSMGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSMGF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSMGF is priced at $0.02, while HBEIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, GSMGF's ROE is +1.32%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GSMGF is less volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSMGF.Check HBEIF's competition here