Genesis Minerals Limited

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ZIJMF trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ZIJMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPYGY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while GFIOF trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check GFIOF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NESRF trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check NESRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTYY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check NCMGY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check NCMGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while LUGDF trades at $46.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check LUGDF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while HGMCF trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGMCF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CAHPF trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check CAHPF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ZHAOF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while AULGF trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AULGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while EDVMF trades at $30.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -71.74. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check EDVMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SBYSF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check SBYSF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ARGTF trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -261.36. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ARGTF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check DGMLF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ZIJMY trades at $53.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ZIJMY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OCANF trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check OCANF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check GRLGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while PMNXF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check PMNXF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while DPMLF trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check DPMLF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CRNLF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check CRNLF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while KNTNF trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check KNTNF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while TORXF trades at $28.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check TORXF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ELKMF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELKMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CELTF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CELTF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RGRNF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and RGRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGRNF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ORAAF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ORAAF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check KOZAY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RMLRF trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMLRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check CXBMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while HCHDF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check HCHDF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while WDOFF trades at $11.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check WDOFF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while REDLF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and REDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDLF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while WFRSF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFRSF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while EOGSF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check EOGSF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check OBNNF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check PAFRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while DRDGF trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check DRDGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MAUTF trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MAUTF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SNWGF trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -48.28. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check SNWGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while AURQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AURQF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHDY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVLKF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check SGSVF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 863.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MWSNF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -66.90. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MWSNF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check KRRGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 830.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RMGGF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RMGGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 829.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RUPRF trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -177.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RUPRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RMGGY trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and RMGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMGGY's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 749.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while BELGF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check BELGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check WTGRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RGDFF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 645.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check PDIYF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 586.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ASGOF trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ASGOF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MNSAF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and MNSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNSAF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check NVMLF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OSKA trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check OSKA's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 470.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while GUYGF trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check GUYGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RSRBF trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 80.67. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RSRBF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ARNGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 462M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RMLFF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RMLFF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while RIOFF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 108.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check RIOFF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while GDRZF trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check GDRZF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ECRTF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and ECRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECRTF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 413.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ORZCF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ORZCF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while KSKGF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check KSKGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NRGOF has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while NRGOF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas NRGOF's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRGOF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to NRGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check NRGOF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check LMGDF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ELEMF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ELEMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 350.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while THXPF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check THXPF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check TPRXF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MAKOF trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MAKOF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 325.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MNDJF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MNDJF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 323.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OMGGF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -27.23. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check OMGGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while PROBF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check PROBF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ALKEF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ALKEF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.30. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check OGNRF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while AGXKF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check AGXKF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MGDPF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSIIF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check ERRSF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while FDMIF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -59.25. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check FDMIF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while STPGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check STPGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while JAGGF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -33.07. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check JAGGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while GGAZF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check GGAZF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while WRLGF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check WRLGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while HSTXF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check HSTXF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAAGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check CNLMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SITKF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check SITKF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while STBMF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STBMF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCNF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while MAIFF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check MAIFF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check CNMXF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while THSGF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check THSGF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while SRBIF trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRBIF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, URGYF has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while URGYF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas URGYF's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to URGYF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF is less volatile compared to URGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSISF.Check URGYF's competition here

GSISF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GSISF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSISF is priced at $2.46, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GSISF currently has a P/E ratio of 35.14, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GSISF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GSISF and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EEYMF's competition here