The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS-PA Peers
See (GS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS-PA | $21.12 | -1.47% | 186.7B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +2.00% |
| MS-PE | $25.52 | +0.59% | 206.8B | 3.25 | $7.86 | +2.89% |
| MS-PK | $22.95 | +0.57% | 206.8B | 2.92 | $7.86 | +2.89% |
| MS-PF | $25.33 | +0.40% | 206.4B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +2.89% |
| MS-PI | $24.61 | +0.16% | 205.9B | 3.13 | $7.86 | +2.89% |
| MS-PA | $22.13 | -0.05% | 205.5B | 2.82 | $7.86 | +2.89% |
| MS | $127.92 | -0.19% | 205.2B | 15.00 | $8.53 | +2.89% |
| GS-PD | $21.41 | -0.39% | 186B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.00% |
| GS-PC | $21.65 | -0.55% | 185.3B | 1.73 | $12.53 | +2.00% |
| GS | $600.26 | -0.76% | 184.2B | 13.94 | $43.07 | +2.00% |
Stock Comparison
GS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 206.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PE trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 206.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PK trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PF trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PI trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PA trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 205.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS trades at $127.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GS-PD trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 185.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GS-PC trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GS trades at $600.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SCHW trades at $88.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 159.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IBKR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while IBKR trades at $209.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PP trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA and MS-PP have similar daily volatility (1.90).
GS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PQ trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while TW trades at $144.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 59.69. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PL trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LPLA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while LPLA trades at $387.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while RJF trades at $146.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MS-PO trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NMR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while NMR trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUTU Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while FUTU trades at $101.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HLI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while HLI trades at $174.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs XP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while XP trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA and XP have similar daily volatility (1.90).
GS-PA vs FRHC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while FRHC trades at $165.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JEF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while JEF trades at $48.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SF trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SF-PB trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EVR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while EVR trades at $231.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MKTX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MKTX trades at $216.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while RJF-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MARA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MARA trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BGC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BGC trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PIPR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while PIPR trades at $251.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MC trades at $57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SNEX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SNEX trades at $84.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA and SNEX have similar daily volatility (1.90).
GS-PA vs LAZ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while LAZ trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PJT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while PJT trades at $150.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs VIRT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while VIRT trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MRX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MRX trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SF-PC trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IREN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while IREN trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -27.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BGCP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SF-PD trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HUT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while HUT trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -23.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PWP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while PWP trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -82.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HKIB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DFIN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while DFIN trades at $54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TIGR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while TIGR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WULF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while WULF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs COWN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIFR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while CIFR trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while CIFRW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 807.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while AC trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs OPY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 681.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while OPY trades at $65.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while FUFUW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUFU Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 566M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while FUFU trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BITF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 508.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BITF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTBT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BTBT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AMRK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 485.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while AMRK trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HIVE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while HIVE trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GHL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTM Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BTM trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SIEB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SIEB trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MFH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MFH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -38.37. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PROP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while PROP trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WHG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while WHG trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 372.75. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SRL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SRL trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TCJH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRYP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GRYP trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HGBL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while HGBL trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRDI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTCS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while BTCS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TOP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while TOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SDIG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MDBH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MDBH trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PLUT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while PLUT trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -50.80. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SWIN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SWIN trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ARBK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while ARBK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GREE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GREE trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SAI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GSIW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GSIW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs COHN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while COHN trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WAI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while WAI trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MIGI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MIGI trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ABTS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while ABTS trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ATIF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NCPLW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NCPL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while NCPL trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MEGL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while MEGL trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LGHLW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while LGHLW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRDIW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SAITW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs STSSW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 186.7B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.12, while STSSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.41, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.