The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS-PA Peers
See (GS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
GS-PA vs MS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 195.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS trades at $121.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 191.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PI trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 191.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 191.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PK trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 190.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PA trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 173.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GS trades at $566.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 173.66B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GS-PD trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 172.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GS-PC trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 157.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SCHW trades at $84.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IBKKF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IBKR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 78.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IBKR trades at $185.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MQBKY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 50.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MQBKY trades at $132.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIIHY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CIIHY trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIIHF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 48.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MCQEF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PQ trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PP trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GUOSF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TW trades at $147.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PL trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RJF trades at $145.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LPLA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.82B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LPLA trades at $360.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.63B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HTNGF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NRSCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NMR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NMR trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HUATF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CMSQY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CMSQY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUTU Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FUTU trades at $102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CMSQF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HLI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HLI trades at $173.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CNICF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HAITY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JEF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JEF trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs XP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while XP trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SF-PB trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FRHC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FRHC trades at $156.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SF trades at $91.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DSECF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DSEEY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DSEEY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MKTX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MKTX trades at $231.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EVR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while EVR trades at $216.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WSOUF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BRPHF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BRPHF trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MARA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MARA trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IVTJF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IGGHY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IVTJY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BGC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BGC trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PIPR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PIPR trades at $251.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SNEX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SNEX trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IGGRF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CLPE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MC trades at $54.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LAZ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LAZ trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs VIRT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while VIRT trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PJT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PJT trades at $144.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MRX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MRX trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CGXYY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LTSAP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CLSKW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PLSQF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SF-PC trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TCAPF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LTSA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SF-PD trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BGCP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FNNTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TIGR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TIGR trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IREN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IREN trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PWP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PWP trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -84.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HKIB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DFIN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DFIN trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HUT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HUT trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MAUSY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NHMAF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MNXBF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DEFTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DEFTF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WULF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WULF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CFNCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIFR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CIFR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs COWN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 775.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while AC trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LKADF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CBGPY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 666.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CBGPY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CCORF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 654.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CCORF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs OPY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 636.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while OPY trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUFU Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FUFU trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PHIG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PHIG trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PHIGW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BITF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 547.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BITF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CBGPF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 520.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AMRK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 496.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while AMRK trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NAGGF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CNSRF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTBT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 423.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BTBT trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CYFRF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 392.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CYFRF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MFH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 387.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MFH trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CESTY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ABGSF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HIVE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 290.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HIVE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CESTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GHL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs APPCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs OSHDF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CSCHF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PROP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 199.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PROP trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ABIT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 190.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs OZFRY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NPPTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WHG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WHG trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PNPFF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 133.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PNPFF trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CIFRW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CAGPF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs STGC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SRL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SRL trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTM Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 108.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BTM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SIEB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SIEB trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CURN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CURN trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TCJH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GEVI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GEVI trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DGTLF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs XAUMF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while XAUMF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DYNA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HGBL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HGBL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRDI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HAFG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HAFG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTCS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BTCS trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ARCNF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs UFFRF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TOP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 44.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TOP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MDBH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MDBH trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SDIG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRYP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 36.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GRYP trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DMGGF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PLUT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PLUT trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CMZZF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SWIN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SWIN trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CRMZ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CFLSF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CBTTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BBKCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BBKCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EBML Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ARBKF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ARBK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 23.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ARBK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SMURF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ABTS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ABTS trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SAI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs COHN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while COHN trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WAI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WAI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BULT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BULT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FWAV Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GREE Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 14.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GREE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FFTTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BCNWF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AVFCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DPXCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FDCT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 11.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MIGI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MIGI trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ABSOF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GSIW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 10.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GSIW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MATEF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MATEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ATIF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ITEX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ITEX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MEGL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MEGL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTCWF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BLVDF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BKBLF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IHLDF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CCPUF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CSTXF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HYHDF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AAMTF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PHIL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NCPL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NCPL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BZRD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BIDCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CRKR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GBCHF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DBKSF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PIHG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PIHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BKLIF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NCPLW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs IFXY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while IFXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NSAV Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NSAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TRAA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TRAA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FNDM Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CBTC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TRAC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TRAC has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TRAC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TRAC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to TRAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRDIW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HAON Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HAON has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HAON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HAON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAON's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EQOSQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, EQOSQ has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while EQOSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EQOSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQOSQ's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to EQOSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GRNBF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GRNBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs GMPW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, GMPW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while GMPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas GMPW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMPW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to GMPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BKLLF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BKLLF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BKLLF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BKLLF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKLLF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BKLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MGTI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MGTI has a market cap of 996268.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MGTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MGTI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGTI's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MXLGF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MXLGF has a market cap of 964416.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MXLGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MXLGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MXLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SAITW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MNTR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MNTR has a market cap of 954188.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MNTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MNTR's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BEGI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 927445.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BLQC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 927153.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BLQC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ICOA Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ICOA has a market cap of 848342.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ICOA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ICOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICOA's ROE of +64.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to ICOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MGHL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MGHL has a market cap of 726109.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MGHL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MGHL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGHL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to MGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CSOL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CSOL has a market cap of 702311.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CSOL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CSOL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CSOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HIPH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 643962.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LGHLW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 480031.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CCTL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CCTL has a market cap of 373483.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCTL's ROE of -7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to CCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JTBK Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JTBK has a market cap of 369253.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JTBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JTBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JTBK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to JTBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BYSD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BYSD has a market cap of 367954.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BYSD trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BYSD's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BYSD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BYSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RDWD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RDWD has a market cap of 340331.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RDWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RDWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDWD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to RDWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs KGRI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, KGRI has a market cap of 317935.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while KGRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas KGRI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to KGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LNTO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LNTO has a market cap of 317503.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LNTO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LNTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNTO's ROE of +18.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LNTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BFCH Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BFCH has a market cap of 241318.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BFCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BFCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFCH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BFCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CBYI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CBYI has a market cap of 238986.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CBYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CBYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBYI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CBYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SOHL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SOHL has a market cap of 228215.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SOHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SOHL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SOHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JMON Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JMON has a market cap of 175903.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JMON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JMON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to JMON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HYBOF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HYBOF has a market cap of 122760.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HYBOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HYBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYBOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HYBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BITCF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 121405.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BITCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BITCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LFAP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LFAP has a market cap of 117989.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LFAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LFAP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RGST Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RGST has a market cap of 85571.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RGST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RGST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to RGST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs VNTN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, VNTN has a market cap of 84884.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while VNTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VNTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to VNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs TWCI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, TWCI has a market cap of 57476.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while TWCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas TWCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWCI's ROE of +9.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to TWCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs CNXS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, CNXS has a market cap of 52661.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while CNXS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas CNXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to CNXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NODC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NODC has a market cap of 42613.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NODC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NODC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NODC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LGHL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 40669.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LGHL trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs UMFG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, UMFG has a market cap of 36754.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while UMFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas UMFG's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to UMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs VTXB Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 32175.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while VTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to VTXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BTGN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BTGN has a market cap of 25361.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BTGN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BTGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTGN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BTGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs AXTG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, AXTG has a market cap of 24479.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while AXTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas AXTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to AXTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BGMO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BGMO has a market cap of 22777.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BGMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BGMO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to BGMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RAFFF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RAFFF has a market cap of 11417.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RAFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RAFFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RAFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs UCSO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, UCSO has a market cap of 8373.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while UCSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas UCSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCSO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to UCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WDBG Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WDBG has a market cap of 8325.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WDBG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WDBG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDBG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WDBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs RMTN Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, RMTN has a market cap of 6049.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while RMTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas RMTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMTN's ROE of +4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to RMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NTFL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NTFL has a market cap of 6034.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NTFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NTFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTFL's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to NTFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs OFSI Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, OFSI has a market cap of 5112.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while OFSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas OFSI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OFSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to OFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs ATCC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, ATCC has a market cap of 2677.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while ATCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas ATCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to ATCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BLPFF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BLPFF has a market cap of 1194.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BLPFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BLPFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLPFF's ROE of -17.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs STSSW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while STSSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EZTD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 520.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while EZTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to EZTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs MERR Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, MERR has a market cap of 456.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while MERR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas MERR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MERR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to MERR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs WSFL Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, WSFL has a market cap of 274.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while WSFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas WSFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSFL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to WSFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs SYSX Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, SYSX has a market cap of 248.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while SYSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas SYSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYSX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to SYSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JRJCY Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JRJCY has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JRJCY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JRJCY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRJCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to JRJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LEHNQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LEHNQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LEHNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LEHNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEHNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LEHNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LEHLQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LEHLQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LEHLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LEHLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEHLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LEHLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JMP Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JMP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to JMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DSRO Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DSRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DSRO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DSRO's P/E ratio is -99.60. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSRO's ROE of +30.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to DSRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs LHHMQ Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, LHHMQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while LHHMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas LHHMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LHHMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to LHHMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs EQOS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, EQOS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while EQOS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas EQOS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to EQOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs FLTDF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, FLTDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while FLTDF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas FLTDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLTDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to FLTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PWPPW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PWPPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PWPPW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PWPPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWPPW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to PWPPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs PIEJF Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, PIEJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while PIEJF trades at $39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas PIEJF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIEJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to PIEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs HVBT Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, HVBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while HVBT trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas HVBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HVBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to HVBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs DPW Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, DPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while DPW trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas DPW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to DPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs BETS Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, BETS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while BETS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas BETS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BETS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to BETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs NILE-PD Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, NILE-PD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while NILE-PD trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas NILE-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NILE-PD's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to NILE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs XPVVV Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, XPVVV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while XPVVV trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas XPVVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPVVV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is more volatile compared to XPVVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
GS-PA vs JRJC Comparison
GS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GS-PA stands at 174.14B. In comparison, JRJC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS-PA is priced at $21.67, while JRJC trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.42, whereas JRJC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GS-PA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRJC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS-PA is less volatile compared to JRJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS-PA.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | $121.70 | -0.15% | 195.25B | 14.27 | $8.53 | +3.04% |
| MS-PE | $25.35 | +0.36% | 191.76B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PI | $24.51 | +0.25% | 191.54B | 3.12 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PF | $25.17 | +0.20% | 191.45B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PK | $22.97 | +0.04% | 191.16B | 2.92 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PA | $21.64 | -0.46% | 190.20B | 2.75 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| GS-PA | $21.67 | +0.32% | 174.14B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS | $566.70 | +0.18% | 173.89B | 13.15 | $43.10 | +2.07% |
| GS-PD | $21.79 | +0.05% | 173.66B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS-PC | $22.17 | -0.58% | 172.58B | 1.77 | $12.53 | +2.07% |