NanoXplore Inc.

GRA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GRA.TO stands at 511.8M. In comparison, MX.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.TO is priced at CA$3.00, while MX.TO trades at CA$45.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GRA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas MX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, GRA.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.TO is less volatile compared to MX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.TO.Check MX.TO's competition here

GRA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GRA.TO stands at 511.8M. In comparison, CHE-UN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.TO is priced at CA$3.00, while CHE-UN.TO trades at CA$11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GRA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas CHE-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, GRA.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CHE-UN.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.TO is more volatile compared to CHE-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.TO.Check CHE-UN.TO's competition here

GRA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GRA.TO stands at 511.8M. In comparison, FAT.CN has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.TO is priced at CA$3.00, while FAT.CN trades at CA$3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GRA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas FAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, GRA.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAT.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.TO is less volatile compared to FAT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.TO.Check FAT.CN's competition here

GRA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GRA.TO stands at 511.8M. In comparison, ARGO.CN has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.TO is priced at CA$3.00, while ARGO.CN trades at CA$0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GRA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas ARGO.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GRA.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARGO.CN's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.TO is less volatile compared to ARGO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.TO.Check ARGO.CN's competition here

GRA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GRA.TO stands at 511.8M. In comparison, OPC.CN has a market cap of 605.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GRA.TO is priced at CA$3.00, while OPC.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GRA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -50.00, whereas OPC.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRA.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OPC.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRA.TO is more volatile compared to OPC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRA.TO.Check OPC.CN's competition here