Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Gladstone Commercial Corporation GOODO Peers
See (GOODO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOODO | $20.50 | +0.03% | 665.29M | 706.77 | $0.03 | +8.51% |
| VICI | $31.08 | -0.89% | 32.84B | 12.43 | $2.50 | +5.51% |
| WPC | $60.02 | -0.02% | 13.14B | 30.94 | $1.94 | +5.86% |
| EPRT | $31.24 | -0.62% | 6.17B | 26.93 | $1.16 | +3.74% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.08B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |
| GNL-PD | $23.37 | +0.56% | 5.22B | N/A | N/A | +12.78% |
| GNL-PE | $22.60 | -0.44% | 5.04B | N/A | N/A | +12.78% |
| GNL-PB | $21.53 | +0.33% | 4.81B | -158.31 | -$0.14 | +12.78% |
| DBRG-PH | $22.71 | +0.66% | 4.00B | -30.52 | -$0.74 | +0.42% |
| DBRG-PI | $22.71 | +0.13% | 4.00B | -30.52 | -$0.74 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
GOODO vs VICI Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 32.84B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while VICI trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs WPC Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while WPC trades at $60.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs EPRT Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while EPRT trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SRC Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GNL-PD Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GNL-PD trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GNL-PE Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GNL-PE trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GNL-PB Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GNL-PB trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -158.31. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs DBRG-PH Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while DBRG-PH trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -30.52. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs DBRG-PI Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while DBRG-PI trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -30.52. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs DBRG-PJ Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while DBRG-PJ trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -30.13. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SRC-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AFINP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AFINO Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs BNL Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while BNL trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs PSB-PY Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs RTLPO Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs RTLPP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs UE Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while UE trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GNL-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GNL-PA trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -167.28. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GNL Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GNL trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs DBRG Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while DBRG trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CLNY Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLNY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CLNC Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs ESRT Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while ESRT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs ALEX Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while ALEX trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AAT Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AAT trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AFIN Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs RTL Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SAFE Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SAFE trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GOODN Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GOODN trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -655.88. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs STAR-PG Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs STAR-PI Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.81M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs STAR-PD Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.16M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AHH Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 732.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AHH trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 72.25. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs AHH-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 724.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while AHH-PA trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 89.34. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs BRSP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 690.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while BRSP trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs STAR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GOOD Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 651.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GOOD trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 46.93. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CTO-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 596.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CTO-PA trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CTO Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 583.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CTO trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs OLP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 515.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while OLP trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs PKST Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 447.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while PKST trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs MDV-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 246.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while MDV-PA trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs FVR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 208.49M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while FVR trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs MDV Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 144.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while MDV trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -158.56. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs MDRR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 28.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while MDRR trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is 625.00. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs MKZR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 17.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while MKZR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs MDRRP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SQFT Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 9.12M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SQFT trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SQFTP Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 8.96M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SQFTP trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -25.56. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs SQFTW Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 8.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GIPR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 8.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GIPR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CORR-PA Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs CORR Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.
GOODO vs GIPRW Comparison
GOODO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODO stands at 665.29M. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 979774.00. Regarding current trading prices, GOODO is priced at $20.50, while GIPRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODO currently has a P/E ratio of 706.77, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GOODO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODO is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODO.