Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOODN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GOODN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOODN | $22.50 | -0.44% | 1B | -661.76 | -$0.03 | +8.85% |
| VICI | $33.38 | -0.09% | 35.3B | 13.35 | $2.50 | +5.19% |
| WPC | $64.60 | +0.25% | 14.1B | 33.29 | $1.94 | +5.50% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |
| EPRT | $30.62 | +0.23% | 6.1B | 25.72 | $1.19 | +3.85% |
| GNL-PD | $23.19 | -0.51% | 5.2B | N/A | N/A | +12.98% |
| GNL-PE | $22.67 | +0.31% | 5.1B | N/A | N/A | +12.98% |
| GNL-PB | $21.30 | +0.33% | 4.7B | -155.88 | -$0.14 | +12.98% |
| DBRG-PJ | $22.23 | -0.49% | 3.9B | -29.88 | -$0.74 | +0.36% |
| DBRG-PI | $22.12 | +0.50% | 3.9B | -29.78 | -$0.74 | +0.36% |
Stock Comparison
GOODN vs VICI Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while VICI trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check VICI's competition here
GOODN vs WPC Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while WPC trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check WPC's competition here
GOODN vs SRC Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SRC's competition here
GOODN vs EPRT Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while EPRT trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check EPRT's competition here
GOODN vs GNL-PD Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GNL-PD trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GNL-PD's competition here
GOODN vs GNL-PE Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GNL-PE trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GNL-PE's competition here
GOODN vs GNL-PB Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GNL-PB trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -155.88. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GNL-PB's competition here
GOODN vs DBRG-PJ Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while DBRG-PJ trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -29.88. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check DBRG-PJ's competition here
GOODN vs DBRG-PI Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while DBRG-PI trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -29.78. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check DBRG-PI's competition here
GOODN vs DBRG-PH Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while DBRG-PH trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check DBRG-PH's competition here
GOODN vs SRC-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SRC-PA's competition here
GOODN vs AFINP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AFINP's competition here
GOODN vs AFINO Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AFINO's competition here
GOODN vs BNL Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while BNL trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check BNL's competition here
GOODN vs PSB-PY Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check PSB-PY's competition here
GOODN vs RTLPO Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check RTLPO's competition here
GOODN vs RTLPP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check RTLPP's competition here
GOODN vs UE Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while UE trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check UE's competition here
GOODN vs DBRG Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while DBRG trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check DBRG's competition here
GOODN vs GNL Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GNL trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GNL's competition here
GOODN vs GNL-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GNL-PA trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GNL-PA's competition here
GOODN vs CLNY Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLNY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CLNY's competition here
GOODN vs ALEX Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while ALEX trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check ALEX's competition here
GOODN vs CLNC Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CLNC's competition here
GOODN vs ESRT Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while ESRT trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check ESRT's competition here
GOODN vs AAT Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AAT trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AAT's competition here
GOODN vs AFIN Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AFIN's competition here
GOODN vs RTL Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check RTL's competition here
GOODN vs SAFE Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SAFE trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SAFE's competition here
GOODN vs STAR-PG Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check STAR-PG's competition here
GOODN vs STAR-PI Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check STAR-PI's competition here
GOODN vs STAR-PD Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check STAR-PD's competition here
GOODN vs AHH-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 724.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AHH-PA trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 91.24. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AHH-PA's competition here
GOODN vs AHH Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while AHH trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 70.55. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check AHH's competition here
GOODN vs STAR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check STAR's competition here
GOODN vs GOODO Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 641.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GOODO trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 699.70. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GOODO's competition here
GOODN vs BRSP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 639.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while BRSP trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check BRSP's competition here
GOODN vs GOOD Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 629.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GOOD trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GOOD's competition here
GOODN vs CTO Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CTO trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.06. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CTO's competition here
GOODN vs CTO-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CTO-PA trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CTO-PA's competition here
GOODN vs PKST Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 507.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while PKST trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check PKST's competition here
GOODN vs OLP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 500.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while OLP trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check OLP's competition here
GOODN vs FVR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while FVR trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check FVR's competition here
GOODN vs MDV-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MDV-PA trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MDV-PA's competition here
GOODN vs MDV Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MDV trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -160.33. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MDV's competition here
GOODN vs MDRRP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MDRRP's competition here
GOODN vs MDRR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MDRR trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MDRR's competition here
GOODN vs SQFTP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SQFTP trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SQFTP's competition here
GOODN vs SQFT Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SQFT trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SQFT's competition here
GOODN vs SQFTW Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check SQFTW's competition here
GOODN vs MKZR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MKZR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MKZR's competition here
GOODN vs GIPR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GIPR trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GIPR's competition here
GOODN vs CORR-PA Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CORR-PA's competition here
GOODN vs CORR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check CORR's competition here
GOODN vs GIPRW Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 489.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GIPRW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GIPRW's competition here
GOODN vs VER-PF Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check VER-PF's competition here
GOODN vs MGP Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check MGP's competition here
GOODN vs STOR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check STOR's competition here
GOODN vs FSPR Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check FSPR's competition here
GOODN vs PSB-PX Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check PSB-PX's competition here
GOODN vs GOODM Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check GOODM's competition here
GOODN vs APTS Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check APTS's competition here
GOODN vs PSB Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check PSB's competition here
GOODN vs VER Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check VER's competition here
GOODN vs PSB-PZ Comparison July 2025
GOODN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODN stands at 1B. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODN is priced at $22.50, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODN currently has a P/E ratio of -661.76, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODN is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODN.Check PSB-PZ's competition here