Gladstone Commercial Corporation

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while VICI trades at $29.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check VICI's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while WPC trades at $71.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check WPC's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while EPRT trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check EPRT's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SRC trades at $42.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SRC's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SRC-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while BNL trades at $18.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check BNL's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AFINP trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AFINP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AFINO trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AFINO's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while DBRG-PH trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -24.68. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check DBRG-PH's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while DBRG-PI trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -24.57. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check DBRG-PI's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while DBRG-PJ trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check DBRG-PJ's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check PSB-PY's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while DBRG trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 128.38. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check DBRG's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while UE trades at $20.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check UE's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check RTLPO's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check RTLPP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, NYMTG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while NYMTG trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas NYMTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to NYMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check NYMTG's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GNL trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GNL's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GNL-PA trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -170.59. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GNL-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while ALEX trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check ALEX's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CLNY trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLNY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CLNY's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CLNC trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CLNC's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AAT trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AAT's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AFIN trades at $8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AFIN's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SAFE trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SAFE's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while RTL trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check RTL's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GOODN trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -673.53. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GOODN's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while ESRT trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check ESRT's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while PKST trades at $20.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -189.41. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check PKST's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check STAR-PG's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check STAR-PI's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check STAR-PD's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 743.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AHH-PA trades at $21.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 90.50. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AHH-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 742.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while BRSP trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check BRSP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 691.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CTO-PA trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CTO-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while STAR trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check STAR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 644.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CTO trades at $19.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CTO's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 623.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GOODO trades at $20.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 697.24. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GOODO's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GOOD trades at $12.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 66.05. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GOOD's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GNL-PD trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GNL-PD's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 507M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GNL-PE trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GNL-PE's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 504.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while OLP trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check OLP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 491.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GNL-PB trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -166.84. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GNL-PB's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 489.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while AHH trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check AHH's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while FVR trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check FVR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MDV-PA trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -16.15. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MDV-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MDV trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -57.26. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MDV's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MDRRP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MDRR trades at $12.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MDRR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SQFTP trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SQFTP's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MKZR trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MKZR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SQFT trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SQFT's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GIPR trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -11.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GIPR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CORR-PA's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while CORR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CORR's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check CORR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 380.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while GIPRW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -11.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check GIPRW's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 27.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while SQFTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check SQFTW's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check PSB-PZ's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check VER-PF's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while FSPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check FSPR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while VER trades at $51.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check VER's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while APTS trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM and APTS have similar daily volatility (0.08).Check APTS's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while STOR trades at $32.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check STOR's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while PSB trades at $187.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check PSB's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check PSB-PX's competition here

GOODM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GOODM stands at 0. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GOODM is priced at $25.01, while MGP trades at $41.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GOODM currently has a P/E ratio of 1042.08, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, GOODM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODM is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODM.Check MGP's competition here