Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GMHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMHS | $1.02 | +0.00% | 53M | 12.38 | $0.08 | N/A |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| NTES | $117.18 | +0.00% | 73.8B | 15.23 | $7.59 | +2.62% |
| EA | $201.00 | +0.09% | 50.5B | 75.65 | $2.67 | +0.38% |
| RBLX | $67.09 | +0.00% | 48.2B | -44.20 | -$1.54 | N/A |
| TTWO | $204.19 | +0.00% | 38.4B | -9.19 | -$22.57 | N/A |
| BILI | $29.68 | +0.00% | 12.3B | 113.12 | $0.26 | N/A |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.06 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 13.13 | $0.24 | +12.88% |
| SOHU | $16.48 | +0.03% | 507.8M | 1.21 | $13.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GMHS vs ATVI Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check ATVI's competition here
GMHS vs NTES Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while NTES trades at $117.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check NTES's competition here
GMHS vs EA Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while EA trades at $201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 75.65. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check EA's competition here
GMHS vs RBLX Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while RBLX trades at $67.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -44.20. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check RBLX's competition here
GMHS vs TTWO Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while TTWO trades at $204.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check TTWO's competition here
GMHS vs BILI Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while BILI trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 113.12. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check BILI's competition here
GMHS vs AVID Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check AVID's competition here
GMHS vs PLTK Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while PLTK trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check PLTK's competition here
GMHS vs SOHU Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while SOHU trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check SOHU's competition here
GMHS vs SCPL Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check SCPL's competition here
GMHS vs GRVY Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 450.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GRVY trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GRVY's competition here
GMHS vs DDI Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while DDI trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check DDI's competition here
GMHS vs GDEV Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 301.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GDEV trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GDEV's competition here
GMHS vs GDC Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 242.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GDC trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GDC's competition here
GMHS vs MGRT Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while MGRT trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check MGRT's competition here
GMHS vs GMGI Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GMGI trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GMGI's competition here
GMHS vs GCL Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GCL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 63.91. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GCL's competition here
GMHS vs MYPS Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while MYPS trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check MYPS's competition here
GMHS vs SKLZ Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while SKLZ trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check SKLZ's competition here
GMHS vs BRAG Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while BRAG trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check BRAG's competition here
GMHS vs GAME Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GAME trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAME's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GAME's competition here
GMHS vs NCTY Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while NCTY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check NCTY's competition here
GMHS vs SNAL Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while SNAL trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +21.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check SNAL's competition here
GMHS vs MSGM Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while MSGM trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check MSGM's competition here
GMHS vs GIGM Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GIGM trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GIGM's competition here
GMHS vs GXAI Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GXAI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GXAI's competition here
GMHS vs MGAM Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while MGAM trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -3.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check MGAM's competition here
GMHS vs GCLWW Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GCLWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GCLWW's competition here
GMHS vs NFTG Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check NFTG's competition here
GMHS vs TBH Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while TBH trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check TBH's competition here
GMHS vs TRUG Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 893K. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while TRUG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRUG's ROE of -56.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check TRUG's competition here
GMHS vs MYPSW Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 889.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check MYPSW's competition here
GMHS vs BHAT Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 449.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while BHAT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check BHAT's competition here
GMHS vs GDEVW Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 235.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GDEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check GDEVW's competition here
GMHS vs GGL Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GMHS has daily volatility of 7.02 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
GMHS vs HPY Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check HPY's competition here
GMHS vs YVR Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check YVR's competition here
GMHS vs SCR Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check SCR's competition here
GMHS vs ZNGA Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check ZNGA's competition here
GMHS vs CCNC Comparison February 2026
GMHS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMHS stands at 53M. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMHS is priced at $1.02, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMHS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMHS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GMHS is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMHS.Check CCNC's competition here