Gallant Venture Ltd.
Gallant Venture Ltd. GLVNF Peers
See (GLVNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLVNF | $0.07 | N/A | 382.42M | -7.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| IBDRY | $73.22 | +2.93% | 114.22B | 26.43 | $2.77 | +2.71% |
| IBDSF | $18.13 | +1.83% | 113.13B | 26.28 | $0.69 | +2.79% |
| ESOCF | $9.19 | +2.20% | 93.30B | 12.25 | $0.75 | +5.69% |
| ENLAY | $9.10 | +1.11% | 92.41B | 12.13 | $0.75 | +4.61% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69.00B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.79B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +2.72% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | N/A | 53.61B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ECIFY | $2.55 | N/A | 53.15B | -2.36 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| ENGIY | $21.24 | +2.19% | 51.62B | 11.54 | $1.84 | +6.44% |
Stock Comparison
GLVNF vs IBDRY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 114.22B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while IBDRY trades at $73.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs IBDSF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 113.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while IBDSF trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ESOCF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 93.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ESOCF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ENLAY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 92.41B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ENLAY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs PPWLM Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and PPWLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs PPWLO Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.79B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ECIFF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.61B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and ECIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs ECIFY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and ECIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs ENGIY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 51.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ENGIY trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ENGQF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 50.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ENGQF trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs EONGY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 45.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while EONGY trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ENAKF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 44.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ENAKF trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and ENAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs RWNFF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 28.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while RWNFF trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and RWNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs RWEOY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 27.93B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while RWEOY trades at $37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs SSEZY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 26.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while SSEZY trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs SSEZF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 24.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while SSEZF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and SSEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs EDPFY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while EDPFY trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ELCPF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 16.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ELCPF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and ELCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs CHUEF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CHUEF trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs AEMMF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs AEMMY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while AEMMY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CDUUF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and CDUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs CDUAF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CDUAF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CUTLF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CUTLF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CNUTF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CDUTF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CNAUF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CNAUF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs HRASF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while HRASF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ACEJF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ACLLF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ACLLF trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ACLTF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ACLTF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs IRDEF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while IRDEF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs CSGEF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs IRDEY Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and IRDEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs VETTF Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while VETTF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs PBEV Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5110.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF and PBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
GLVNF vs CMNR Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3076.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.
GLVNF vs ARAO Comparison
GLVNF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLVNF stands at 382.42M. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 694.00. Regarding current trading prices, GLVNF is priced at $0.07, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLVNF currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLVNF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLVNF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLVNF.