Gelesis Holdings, Inc.
Gelesis Holdings, Inc. GLS Peers
See (GLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLS | $0.16 | N/A | 11.6M | -0.12 | -$1.30 | N/A |
| VRTX | $440.90 | -1.67% | 113.2B | -115.12 | -$3.83 | N/A |
| REGN | $509.72 | -0.75% | 54.1B | 12.96 | $39.32 | +0.35% |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $309.70 | -0.84% | 40.4B | -148.18 | -$2.09 | N/A |
| ARGX | $542.15 | +0.79% | 33.1B | 33.04 | $16.41 | N/A |
| BNTX | $106.53 | +2.04% | 25.6B | -29.03 | -$3.67 | N/A |
| BGNE | $184.71 | +0.49% | 20.2B | -22.55 | -$8.19 | N/A |
| RPRX | $34.86 | -0.14% | 19.6B | 14.23 | $2.45 | +2.47% |
| DNA-WT | $0.27 | -2.76% | 18.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GLS vs VRTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while VRTX trades at $440.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is -115.12. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VRTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs REGN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while REGN trades at $509.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SGEN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ALNY Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ALNY trades at $309.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is -148.18. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALNY's ROE of -5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ARGX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ARGX trades at $542.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BNTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BNTX trades at $106.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BGNE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BGNE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RPRX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RPRX trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs DNA-WT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SMMT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SMMT trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -60.47. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs INCY Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while INCY trades at $68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 342.30. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs GMAB Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while GMAB trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs UTHR Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while UTHR trades at $290.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs KRTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs EXEL Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while EXEL trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ASND Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ASND trades at $176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BMRN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BMRN trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MRNA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MRNA trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RXDX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs IMGN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BPMC Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BPMC trades at $128.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.08. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CERE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs VRNA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while VRNA trades at $94.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -47.16. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BBIO Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BBIO trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ROIVW Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ROIVW has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ROIVW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ROIVW's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ROIVW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ROIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs TECH Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while TECH trades at $49.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 60.11. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ROIV Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ROIV trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CORT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CORT trades at $71.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 62.07. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RVMD Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RVMD trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RETA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs HALO Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while HALO trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs JAZZ Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while JAZZ trades at $107.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MDGL Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MDGL trades at $285.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs IONS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while IONS trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs TLX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while TLX trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is 190.56. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs TGTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while TGTX trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 144.08. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ABCM Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ISEE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs NUVL Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while NUVL trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs AMRN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AMRN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while AMRN trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AMRN's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMRN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to AMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs AXSM Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while AXSM trades at $100.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -17.45. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ALKS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ALKS trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ALPN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs AKRO Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while AKRO trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs PCVX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while PCVX trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ADMA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ADMA trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs OPT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OPT's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MRTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SLNO Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SLNO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SLNO trades at $79.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SLNO's P/E ratio is -16.87. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLNO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SLNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs PTCT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while PTCT trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MRUS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MRUS trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RYTM Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RYTM trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CYTK Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CYTK trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +8.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs KRYS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while KRYS trades at $132.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CRSP Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CRSP trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ACAD Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ACAD trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ZLAB Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ZLAB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ZLAB trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ZLAB's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZLAB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ZLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RYZB Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CBAY Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SWTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SWTX trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RNA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RNA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RNA trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RNA's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RNA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RARE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RARE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RARE trades at $37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RARE's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RARE's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ACLX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ACLX trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs PTGX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while PTGX trades at $53.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is 68.38. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTGX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs AAPG Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AAPG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while AAPG trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AAPG's P/E ratio is -49.84. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AAPG's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to AAPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SRRK Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SRRK trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs LEGN Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while LEGN trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MTSR Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MTSR trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs KYMR Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while KYMR trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs VKTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while VKTX trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -22.42. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MORF Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MORF trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MOR Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MOR trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MOR's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CRNX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CRNX trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MLTX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MLTX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MLTX trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MLTX's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MLTX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CPRX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CPRX trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs KDNY Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KDNY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while KDNY trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KDNY's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KDNY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to KDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs IMVT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while IMVT trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MYOV Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MYOV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MYOV trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MYOV's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MYOV's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MYOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs IBRX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while IBRX trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs APGE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while APGE trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs MIRM Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while MIRM trades at $50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs XENE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while XENE trades at $32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs PRVB Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PRVB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while PRVB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PRVB's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PRVB's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to PRVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs NAMSW Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while NAMSW trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs LBPH Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LBPH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while LBPH trades at $59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LBPH's P/E ratio is -26.66. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LBPH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to LBPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs DICE Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DICE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while DICE trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DICE's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DICE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to DICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs APLS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while APLS trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to APLS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs LGND Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while LGND trades at $114.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LGND's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs CALT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CALT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while CALT trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CALT's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CALT's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to CALT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs ARWR Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while ARWR trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs VCEL Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VCEL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while VCEL trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VCEL's P/E ratio is 840.40. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VCEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to VCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs BCRX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BCRX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while BCRX trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BCRX's P/E ratio is -38.85. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BCRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to BCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs KNSA Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while KNSA trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is -118.50. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KNSA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs VCYT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while VCYT trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 62.83. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs DNLI Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while DNLI trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs NAMS Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while NAMS trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs RXRX Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RXRX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while RXRX trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RXRX's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RXRX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to RXRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs AGIO Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AGIO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while AGIO trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AGIO's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AGIO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to AGIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.
GLS vs SRPT Comparison
GLS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLS stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SRPT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLS is priced at $0.16, while SRPT trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SRPT's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, GLS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SRPT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLS is more volatile compared to SRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLS.