Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited
Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited (GIPCL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GIPCL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIPCL.NS | ₹126.78 | -3.06% | 19.7B | 13.39 | ₹9.47 | +3.08% |
| NTPC.BO | ₹372.55 | -2.17% | 3.6T | 20.59 | ₹18.09 | +2.32% |
| POWERGRID.NS | ₹302.10 | +1.82% | 2.8T | 19.38 | ₹15.59 | +3.02% |
| POWERGRID.BO | ₹301.65 | +1.39% | 2.8T | 19.35 | ₹15.59 | +3.02% |
| NLCINDIA.NS | ₹253.80 | -4.71% | 351.9B | 13.22 | ₹19.20 | +1.91% |
| NLCINDIA.BO | ₹253.60 | -4.77% | 351.7B | 13.19 | ₹19.23 | +1.91% |
| CESC.BO | ₹148.55 | -2.81% | 196.9B | 13.58 | ₹10.94 | +3.93% |
| PGINVIT.NS | ₹89.98 | -0.91% | 81.9B | 6.06 | ₹14.86 | N/A |
| PGINVIT-IV.NS | ₹89.98 | -0.91% | 81.9B | N/A | N/A | +9.64% |
| SGMART.BO | ₹444.70 | +2.54% | 53B | 52.57 | ₹8.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GIPCL.NS vs NTPC.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NTPC.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while NTPC.BO trades at ₹372.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas NTPC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTPC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to NTPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check NTPC.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs POWERGRID.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, POWERGRID.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while POWERGRID.NS trades at ₹302.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas POWERGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POWERGRID.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to POWERGRID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check POWERGRID.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs POWERGRID.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, POWERGRID.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while POWERGRID.BO trades at ₹301.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas POWERGRID.BO's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POWERGRID.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to POWERGRID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check POWERGRID.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs NLCINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 351.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while NLCINDIA.NS trades at ₹253.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas NLCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLCINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check NLCINDIA.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs NLCINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 351.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while NLCINDIA.BO trades at ₹253.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas NLCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check NLCINDIA.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs CESC.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CESC.BO has a market cap of 196.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while CESC.BO trades at ₹148.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas CESC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CESC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to CESC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check CESC.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs PGINVIT.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PGINVIT.NS has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while PGINVIT.NS trades at ₹89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas PGINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGINVIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to PGINVIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check PGINVIT.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs PGINVIT-IV.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PGINVIT-IV.NS has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while PGINVIT-IV.NS trades at ₹89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas PGINVIT-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGINVIT-IV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to PGINVIT-IV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check PGINVIT-IV.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs SGMART.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SGMART.BO has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while SGMART.BO trades at ₹444.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas SGMART.BO's P/E ratio is 52.57. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGMART.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to SGMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check SGMART.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs RELINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RELINFRA.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while RELINFRA.NS trades at ₹73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas RELINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RELINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to RELINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check RELINFRA.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs GIPCL.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GIPCL.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while GIPCL.BO trades at ₹127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas GIPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GIPCL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to GIPCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check GIPCL.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs BAJEL.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BAJEL.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while BAJEL.NS trades at ₹156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas BAJEL.NS's P/E ratio is 164.32. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAJEL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check BAJEL.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs BAJEL.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BAJEL.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while BAJEL.BO trades at ₹155.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas BAJEL.BO's P/E ratio is 165.69. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAJEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check BAJEL.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs DPSCLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DPSCLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while DPSCLTD.NS trades at ₹7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas DPSCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 250.67. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DPSCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to DPSCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check DPSCLTD.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs EKI.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EKI.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while EKI.BO trades at ₹74.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas EKI.BO's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EKI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to EKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check EKI.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs MADHAVIPL.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MADHAVIPL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while MADHAVIPL.BO trades at ₹7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas MADHAVIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MADHAVIPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to MADHAVIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check MADHAVIPL.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs ENERGYDEV.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.NS has a market cap of 686.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while ENERGYDEV.NS trades at ₹14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas ENERGYDEV.NS's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENERGYDEV.NS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check ENERGYDEV.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs ENERGYDEV.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.BO has a market cap of 685M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while ENERGYDEV.BO trades at ₹14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas ENERGYDEV.BO's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENERGYDEV.BO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check ENERGYDEV.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs WAA.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WAA.BO has a market cap of 624.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while WAA.BO trades at ₹47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas WAA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to WAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check WAA.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs GITARENEW.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GITARENEW.BO has a market cap of 309.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while GITARENEW.BO trades at ₹75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas GITARENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -134.21. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GITARENEW.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to GITARENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check GITARENEW.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs AGNI.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AGNI.NS has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while AGNI.NS trades at ₹13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas AGNI.NS's P/E ratio is 61.82. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGNI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to AGNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check AGNI.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs KSK.NS Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KSK.NS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while KSK.NS trades at ₹0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas KSK.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSK.NS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to KSK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check KSK.NS's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs SRMENERGY.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SRMENERGY.BO has a market cap of 165.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while SRMENERGY.BO trades at ₹18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas SRMENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRMENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is less volatile compared to SRMENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check SRMENERGY.BO's competition here
GIPCL.NS vs ANANDPROJ.BO Comparison March 2026
GIPCL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GIPCL.NS stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ANANDPROJ.BO has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GIPCL.NS is priced at ₹126.78, while ANANDPROJ.BO trades at ₹23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GIPCL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas ANANDPROJ.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GIPCL.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANANDPROJ.BO's ROE of -10.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GIPCL.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDPROJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GIPCL.NS.Check ANANDPROJ.BO's competition here