Gold and GemStone Mining Inc.
Gold and GemStone Mining Inc. (GGSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GGSM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGSM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 362.8K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.02 | +150.00% | 124.7B | 0.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FBSGF | $0.10 | +999900.00% | 15.6B | -1.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $19.20 | +1.59% | 14.1B | 101.05 | $0.19 | +3.87% |
| ANGPY | $7.77 | +4.16% | 12.2B | 155.40 | $0.05 | +8.23% |
| IMPUY | $9.75 | +1.67% | 8.8B | -9.18 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $9.21 | -3.05% | 8.3B | -8.61 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $9.22 | -7.80% | 5.1B | -31.47 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.15 | -4.23% | 3.2B | 18.52 | $0.44 | +0.98% |
Stock Comparison
GGSM vs AUXIF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AUXIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AUXIF's competition here
GGSM vs FBSGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, FBSGF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while FBSGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBSGF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FBSGF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to FBSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check FBSGF's competition here
GGSM vs FNLPF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while FNLPF trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 101.05. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check FNLPF's competition here
GGSM vs ANGPY Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ANGPY trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 155.40. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ANGPY's competition here
GGSM vs IMPUY Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while IMPUY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check IMPUY's competition here
GGSM vs IMPUF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while IMPUF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check IMPUF's competition here
GGSM vs OICT Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while OICT trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check OICT's competition here
GGSM vs NMPNF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check NMPNF's competition here
GGSM vs JINFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while JINFF trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check JINFF's competition here
GGSM vs GMINF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GMINF trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GMINF's competition here
GGSM vs POYYF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check POYYF's competition here
GGSM vs ZMPLF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ZMPLF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ZMPLF's competition here
GGSM vs HEGLF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 984.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while HEGLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check HEGLF's competition here
GGSM vs AUCOY Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AUCOY's competition here
GGSM vs ABBRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 512.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ABBRF trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -35.64. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ABBRF's competition here
GGSM vs GLGDF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 498.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GLGDF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 152.50. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GLGDF's competition here
GGSM vs TPRFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TPRFF's competition here
GGSM vs TIHRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TIHRF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TIHRF's competition here
GGSM vs GOTRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 262.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GOTRF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GOTRF's competition here
GGSM vs BRVMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BRVMF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BRVMF's competition here
GGSM vs SAPLF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SAPLF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SAPLF's competition here
GGSM vs PLLHF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PLLHF's competition here
GGSM vs IAUFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while IAUFF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check IAUFF's competition here
GGSM vs SLVTF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 168.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SLVTF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SLVTF's competition here
GGSM vs BOCOF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BOCOF's competition here
GGSM vs XANAF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check XANAF's competition here
GGSM vs BKRRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BKRRF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BKRRF's competition here
GGSM vs SDRC Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -310.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SDRC's competition here
GGSM vs PDIV Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PDIV trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PDIV's competition here
GGSM vs CTNXF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CTNXF's competition here
GGSM vs VLMGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while VLMGF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -92.93. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check VLMGF's competition here
GGSM vs LNXGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, LNXGF has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while LNXGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNXGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LNXGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to LNXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check LNXGF's competition here
GGSM vs EMPYF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while EMPYF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check EMPYF's competition here
GGSM vs ARRKF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ARRKF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ARRKF's competition here
GGSM vs PAASF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PAASF's competition here
GGSM vs CHPGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CHPGF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CHPGF's competition here
GGSM vs INMNF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check INMNF's competition here
GGSM vs CAPTF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CAPTF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -33.65. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CAPTF's competition here
GGSM vs PDLMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PDLMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PDLMF's competition here
GGSM vs ACRG Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ACRG trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ACRG's competition here
GGSM vs OCGSF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while OCGSF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check OCGSF's competition here
GGSM vs LUCRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while LUCRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check LUCRF's competition here
GGSM vs SMDRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SMDRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SMDRF's competition here
GGSM vs ORVMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ORVMF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ORVMF's competition here
GGSM vs MERG Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while MERG trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -16.99. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check MERG's competition here
GGSM vs SSVFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SSVFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SSVFF's competition here
GGSM vs DNCVF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while DNCVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check DNCVF's competition here
GGSM vs BRGC Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BRGC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BRGC's competition here
GGSM vs ACKRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ACKRF's competition here
GGSM vs BBBXF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BBBXF's competition here
GGSM vs TSORF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TSORF's competition here
GGSM vs TEUTF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TEUTF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TEUTF's competition here
GGSM vs KDKCF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while KDKCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check KDKCF's competition here
GGSM vs DYNR Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while DYNR trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check DYNR's competition here
GGSM vs SSVRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SSVRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SSVRF's competition here
GGSM vs SNNGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SNNGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SNNGF's competition here
GGSM vs WAMFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while WAMFF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check WAMFF's competition here
GGSM vs ELRFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ELRFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ELRFF's competition here
GGSM vs HMRRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check HMRRF's competition here
GGSM vs SCTSF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SCTSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SCTSF's competition here
GGSM vs VTXXF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while VTXXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check VTXXF's competition here
GGSM vs FCSUF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check FCSUF's competition here
GGSM vs TBXXF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TBXXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TBXXF's competition here
GGSM vs OKPRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check OKPRF's competition here
GGSM vs SMOFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SMOFF's competition here
GGSM vs MMNGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -17.36. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check MMNGF's competition here
GGSM vs EQMEF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while EQMEF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check EQMEF's competition here
GGSM vs TLSMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check TLSMF's competition here
GGSM vs ATEPF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ATEPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -27.57. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ATEPF's competition here
GGSM vs KGFMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while KGFMF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check KGFMF's competition here
GGSM vs CTMCF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CTMCF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CTMCF's competition here
GGSM vs GBRRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GBRRF's competition here
GGSM vs DNRSF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while DNRSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check DNRSF's competition here
GGSM vs ADYRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while ADYRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check ADYRF's competition here
GGSM vs GSMGF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GSMGF's competition here
GGSM vs GLDRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check GLDRF's competition here
GGSM vs NAUFF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while NAUFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check NAUFF's competition here
GGSM vs AGMRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AGMRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AGMRF's competition here
GGSM vs AGLDF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AGLDF's competition here
GGSM vs PNTRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PNTRF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -41.80. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PNTRF's competition here
GGSM vs WEXPF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while WEXPF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check WEXPF's competition here
GGSM vs SHGDF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SHGDF's competition here
GGSM vs VIPRF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while VIPRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check VIPRF's competition here
GGSM vs EMPPF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while EMPPF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check EMPPF's competition here
GGSM vs MRZLF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while MRZLF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check MRZLF's competition here
GGSM vs AUCUF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AUCUF's competition here
GGSM vs LGCXF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check LGCXF's competition here
GGSM vs URVNF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check URVNF's competition here
GGSM vs THMG Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while THMG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check THMG's competition here
GGSM vs CJIMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CJIMF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CJIMF's competition here
GGSM vs LBCMF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while LBCMF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check LBCMF's competition here
GGSM vs PVGDF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PVGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PVGDF's competition here
GGSM vs BYRG Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check BYRG's competition here
GGSM vs AUSVF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check AUSVF's competition here
GGSM vs HBEIF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while HBEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -63.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check HBEIF's competition here
GGSM vs SEKZF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SEKZF's competition here
GGSM vs CNRIF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while CNRIF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check CNRIF's competition here
GGSM vs SBMCF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while SBMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is more volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check SBMCF's competition here
GGSM vs PMMEF Comparison August 2025
GGSM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GGSM stands at 362.8K. In comparison, PMMEF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GGSM is priced at $0.00, while PMMEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GGSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMMEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GGSM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMMEF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GGSM is less volatile compared to PMMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GGSM.Check PMMEF's competition here