GreenShift Corporation
GreenShift Corporation (GERS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GERS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GERS | $0.04 | +0.00% | 22.6B | N/A | $21.21 | N/A |
| VEOEF | $34.28 | -3.30% | 25.2B | 19.27 | $1.79 | +4.53% |
| VEOEY | $16.94 | -0.21% | 24.8B | 19.06 | $0.89 | +4.64% |
| FMOCY | $2.74 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 18.27 | $0.15 | +25.65% |
| FMOCF | $10.30 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 13.92 | $0.74 | +5.54% |
| TSPCF | $2.10 | +3.70% | 4.7B | 42.00 | $0.05 | +1.69% |
| TMRAF | $14.48 | +2.62% | 4.3B | 36.20 | $0.40 | +1.47% |
| TMRAY | $13.85 | -1.14% | 4.1B | 34.63 | $0.40 | +1.51% |
| CHFFF | $0.47 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 6.71 | $0.07 | +6.29% |
| SECYF | $11.10 | +0.91% | 2.4B | 16.82 | $0.66 | +2.58% |
Stock Comparison
GERS vs VEOEF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while VEOEF trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and VEOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEOEF's competition here
GERS vs VEOEY Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while VEOEY trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check VEOEY's competition here
GERS vs FMOCY Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while FMOCY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check FMOCY's competition here
GERS vs FMOCF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to FMOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check FMOCF's competition here
GERS vs TSPCF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TSPCF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and TSPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSPCF's competition here
GERS vs TMRAF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TMRAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TMRAF trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRAF's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TMRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and TMRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMRAF's competition here
GERS vs TMRAY Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TMRAY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 34.63. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TMRAY's competition here
GERS vs CHFFF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to CHFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check CHFFF's competition here
GERS vs SECYF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SECYF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SECYF's competition here
GERS vs BFFBF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BFFBF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BFFBF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFFBF's P/E ratio is -123.98. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BFFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to BFFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check BFFBF's competition here
GERS vs BFSAF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BFSAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BFSAF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFSAF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BFSAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to BFSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check BFSAF's competition here
GERS vs DSKIF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while DSKIF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and DSKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSKIF's competition here
GERS vs SZDEF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and SZDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZDEF's competition here
GERS vs TNJIF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 928.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TNJIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TNJIF's competition here
GERS vs SECVY Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SECVY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and SECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SECVY's competition here
GERS vs SHMCF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 754.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SHMCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and SHMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHMCF's competition here
GERS vs SCPJ Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 297.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SCPJ trades at $325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SCPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SCPJ's competition here
GERS vs AGXXF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while AGXXF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to AGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check AGXXF's competition here
GERS vs CHFFY Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CHFFY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to CHFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check CHFFY's competition here
GERS vs MBRFF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while MBRFF trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to MBRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check MBRFF's competition here
GERS vs QNTFF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while QNTFF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and QNTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QNTFF's competition here
GERS vs ANRGF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ANRGF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and ANRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANRGF's competition here
GERS vs BTQNF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BTQNF trades at $39.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to BTQNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check BTQNF's competition here
GERS vs ROOOF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ROOOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -66.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check ROOOF's competition here
GERS vs ECLMF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ECLMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -4.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check ECLMF's competition here
GERS vs GCEI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GCEI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check GCEI's competition here
GERS vs VCIGF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while VCIGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and VCIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCIGF's competition here
GERS vs OCLN Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while OCLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check OCLN's competition here
GERS vs CTRNF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CTRNF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and CTRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRNF's competition here
GERS vs LEIC Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while LEIC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check LEIC's competition here
GERS vs SEPOF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SEPOF's competition here
GERS vs HUIPF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while HUIPF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to HUIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check HUIPF's competition here
GERS vs TESI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TESI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TESI's ROE of +16.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TESI's competition here
GERS vs BCCEF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BCCEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and BCCEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCEF's competition here
GERS vs SNRG Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SNRG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SNRG's competition here
GERS vs HNRC Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while HNRC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and HNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNRC's competition here
GERS vs NWLXF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to NWLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check NWLXF's competition here
GERS vs CWSFF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CWSFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check CWSFF's competition here
GERS vs EQTE Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while EQTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check EQTE's competition here
GERS vs EAATF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while EAATF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -90.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to EAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check EAATF's competition here
GERS vs AFBG Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while AFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check AFBG's competition here
GERS vs ECEZ Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and ECEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECEZ's competition here
GERS vs SENR Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SENR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SENR's competition here
GERS vs EXSO Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 877.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while EXSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and EXSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXSO's competition here
GERS vs CRVYF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and CRVYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRVYF's competition here
GERS vs MCIM Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 505.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while MCIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and MCIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCIM's competition here
GERS vs ECPL Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 406.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ECPL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECPL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and ECPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECPL's competition here
GERS vs TRTI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 306.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TRTI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TRTI's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TRTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TRTI's competition here
GERS vs JPEX Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 167.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while JPEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and JPEX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPEX's competition here
GERS vs USLQ Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 146.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while USLQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to USLQ's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check USLQ's competition here
GERS vs SUNC Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 138.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SUNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SUNC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check SUNC's competition here
GERS vs BWPC Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 94.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BWPC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to BWPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check BWPC's competition here
GERS vs IPWG Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 81.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while IPWG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to IPWG's ROE of -7.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check IPWG's competition here
GERS vs RGDEF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and RGDEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGDEF's competition here
GERS vs DGWR Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 67.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while DGWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and DGWR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGWR's competition here
GERS vs MJWL Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while MJWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and MJWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MJWL's competition here
GERS vs GARB Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 47.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GARB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and GARB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GARB's competition here
GERS vs BEEN Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BEEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and BEEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEEN's competition here
GERS vs UVSS Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while UVSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and UVSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UVSS's competition here
GERS vs EVSP Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while EVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EVSP's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check EVSP's competition here
GERS vs CLIRF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check CLIRF's competition here
GERS vs NXSI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while NXSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check NXSI's competition here
GERS vs GMND Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GMND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GMND's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and GMND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMND's competition here
GERS vs EXPL Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 16.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while EXPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and EXPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXPL's competition here
GERS vs TMEN Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TMEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TMEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TMEN's competition here
GERS vs PTOI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while PTOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to PTOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check PTOI's competition here
GERS vs GNCC Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GNCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check GNCC's competition here
GERS vs NWMH Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while NWMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check NWMH's competition here
GERS vs CESX Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CESX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CESX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and CESX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CESX's competition here
GERS vs CIWT Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CIWT has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while CIWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CIWT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to CIWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check CIWT's competition here
GERS vs BEHL Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 656. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while BEHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and BEHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEHL's competition here
GERS vs ECCI Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 581. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ECCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECCI's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check ECCI's competition here
GERS vs GETH Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GETH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and GETH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETH's competition here
GERS vs SRPX Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 206. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while SRPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and SRPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRPX's competition here
GERS vs GRNO Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while GRNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and GRNO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRNO's competition here
GERS vs TRITF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 85. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while TRITF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS is less volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GERS.Check TRITF's competition here
GERS vs MPHD Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while MPHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MPHD's ROE of -70.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and MPHD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPHD's competition here
GERS vs ALAN Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ALAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and ALAN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALAN's competition here
GERS vs ZWTYF Comparison August 2025
GERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GERS stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ZWTYF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GERS is priced at $0.04, while ZWTYF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GERS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWTYF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, GERS's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZWTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GERS and ZWTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZWTYF's competition here