GreenShift Corporation
GreenShift Corporation Fundamental Analysis
GreenShift Corporation (GERS) shows moderate financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -0.00, profit margin of 0.00%, and ROE of 64.04%. The company generates N/A in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.
Key Strengths
Areas of Concern
The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of 55.1/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The C grade reflects average fundamentals, with notable risks in certain areas.
Fundamental Health Score
We analyze GERS's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:
Efficiency Score
WeakGERS struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.
Valuation Score
ExcellentGERS trades at attractive valuation levels.
Growth Score
ModerateGERS shows steady but slowing expansion.
Financial Health Score
ModerateGERS shows balanced financial health with some risks.
Profitability Score
WeakGERS struggles to sustain strong margins.
Key Financial Metrics
Is GERS Expensive or Cheap?
P/E Ratio
GERS trades at -0.00 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.
PEG Ratio
When adjusting for growth, GERS's PEG of -0.00 indicates potential undervaluation.
Price to Book
The market values GreenShift Corporation at -0.00 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value stands at 0.90 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.
How Well Does GERS Make Money?
Net Profit Margin
For every $100 in sales, GreenShift Corporation keeps $0.00 as profit after all expenses.
Operating Margin
Core operations generate 0.00 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.
ROE
Management delivers $64.04 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.
ROA
GreenShift Corporation generates $-138022.95 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.
Following the Money - Real Cash Generation
FCF Per Share
Each share generates $-0.00 in free cash annually.
FCF Yield
GERS converts -56.66% of its market value into free cash.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Valuation Ratios
P/E Ratio
Price to earnings ratio
-0.00
vs 25 benchmark
PEG Ratio
Price/earnings to growth ratio
-0.00
vs 25 benchmark
P/B Ratio
Price to book value ratio
-0.00
vs 25 benchmark
P/S Ratio
Price to sales ratio
0.00
vs 25 benchmark
Financial Health
Debt/Equity
Total debt to shareholders' equity
-0.41
vs 25 benchmark
Current Ratio
Current assets to current liabilities
0.00
vs 25 benchmark
Efficiency Ratios
ROE
Return on equity percentage
0.64
vs 25 benchmark
ROA
Return on assets percentage
-138022.95
vs 25 benchmark
ROCE
Return on capital employed
0.05
vs 25 benchmark
How GERS Stacks Against Its Sector Peers
| Metric | GERS Value | Sector Average | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -0.00 | 26.72 | Better (Cheaper) |
| ROE | 64.04% | 1297.00% | Weak |
| Net Margin | 0.00% | -38908.00% (disorted) | Weak |
| Debt/Equity | -0.41 | 0.72 | Strong (Low Leverage) |
| Current Ratio | 0.00 | 10.10 | Weak Liquidity |
| ROA | -13802295.00% | -1511770.00% (disorted) | Weak |
GERS outperforms its industry in 2 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.
Historical Growth Performance
5-Year Growth Trajectory
This section reviews GreenShift Corporation's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.
Revenue CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
EPS CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
FCF CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure