GCL Global Holdings Ltd Warrants
GCL Global Holdings Ltd Warrants GCLWW Peers
See (GCLWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCLWW | $0.10 | -7.14% | 445.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NTES | $128.28 | +0.55% | 81.6B | 18.38 | $6.98 | +2.54% |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | N/A |
| RBLX | $105.69 | +0.63% | 71.7B | -79.48 | -$1.33 | N/A |
| TTWO | $233.92 | -0.60% | 41.5B | -9.15 | -$25.57 | N/A |
| EA | $148.69 | -1.73% | 37.4B | 34.90 | $4.26 | +0.64% |
| BILI | $21.46 | -1.74% | 8.7B | -107.25 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| PLTK | $4.72 | -3.48% | 1.8B | 12.42 | $0.38 | +8.45% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| DDI | $10.10 | +0.20% | 497.5M | 4.24 | $2.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GCLWW vs NTES Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while NTES trades at $128.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs ATVI Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs RBLX Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while RBLX trades at $105.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -79.48. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs TTWO Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while TTWO trades at $233.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs EA Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while EA trades at $148.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs BILI Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while BILI trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is -107.25. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BILI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs PLTK Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while PLTK trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs AVID Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs DDI Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while DDI trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs SCPL Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GCL Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GCL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is -349.00. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GRVY Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 439.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GRVY trades at $63.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs SOHU Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while SOHU trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GDEV Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GDEV trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GMGI Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 254.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GMGI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -183.00. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs MYPSW Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs MYPS Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 156.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while MYPS trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs SKLZ Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while SKLZ trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs BRAG Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while BRAG trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GMHS Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GMHS trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GAME Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GAME trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GAME's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GDC Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GDC trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GDC's ROE of -5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs TRUG Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while TRUG trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TRUG's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs SNAL Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while SNAL trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNAL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs NCTY Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while NCTY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs MSGM Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while MSGM trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSGM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GIGM Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GIGM trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs BHAT Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while BHAT trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GXAI Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GXAI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs TBH Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while TBH trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TBH's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs MGAM Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while MGAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs NFTG Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GDEVW Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 259.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GDEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs GGL Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GCLWW has daily volatility of 38.48 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.
GCLWW vs CCNC Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs ZNGA Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs YVR Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.
GCLWW vs SCR Comparison
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 445.2M. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.10, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.