GCL Global Holdings Ltd Warrants
GCL Global Holdings Ltd Warrants (GCLWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GCLWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCLWW | $0.03 | -5.50% | 4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NTES | $116.43 | -2.29% | 75.6B | 15.60 | $7.59 | +2.56% |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| EA | $200.68 | +0.40% | 50.2B | 75.06 | $2.67 | +0.38% |
| RBLX | $62.16 | -3.54% | 43.9B | -40.26 | -$1.54 | N/A |
| TTWO | $196.30 | -2.52% | 37B | -8.85 | -$22.57 | N/A |
| BILI | $29.66 | -4.20% | 12.7B | 116.54 | $0.26 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.14 | -9.39% | 1.3B | 14.46 | $0.24 | +11.53% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GCLWW vs NTES Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while NTES trades at $116.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check NTES's competition here
GCLWW vs ATVI Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check ATVI's competition here
GCLWW vs EA Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while EA trades at $200.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 75.06. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check EA's competition here
GCLWW vs RBLX Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while RBLX trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -40.26. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check RBLX's competition here
GCLWW vs TTWO Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, TTWO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while TTWO trades at $196.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTWO's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTWO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to TTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check TTWO's competition here
GCLWW vs BILI Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while BILI trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 116.54. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check BILI's competition here
GCLWW vs PLTK Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while PLTK trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check PLTK's competition here
GCLWW vs AVID Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check AVID's competition here
GCLWW vs SCPL Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check SCPL's competition here
GCLWW vs SOHU Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 492.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while SOHU trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check SOHU's competition here
GCLWW vs GRVY Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 449M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GRVY trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GRVY's competition here
GCLWW vs DDI Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 437.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while DDI trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check DDI's competition here
GCLWW vs GDEV Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GDEV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GDEV's competition here
GCLWW vs GDC Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GDC trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GDC's competition here
GCLWW vs MGRT Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while MGRT trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check MGRT's competition here
GCLWW vs GCL Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GCL trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 66.94. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GCL's competition here
GCLWW vs GMGI Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GMGI trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GMGI's competition here
GCLWW vs MYPS Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while MYPS trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check MYPS's competition here
GCLWW vs GMHS Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GMHS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GMHS's competition here
GCLWW vs SKLZ Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while SKLZ trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check SKLZ's competition here
GCLWW vs BRAG Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while BRAG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check BRAG's competition here
GCLWW vs GAME Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GAME trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GAME's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GAME's competition here
GCLWW vs SNAL Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while SNAL trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +21.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check SNAL's competition here
GCLWW vs NCTY Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while NCTY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check NCTY's competition here
GCLWW vs GIGM Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GIGM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GIGM's competition here
GCLWW vs MSGM Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while MSGM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check MSGM's competition here
GCLWW vs GXAI Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GXAI trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GXAI's competition here
GCLWW vs MGAM Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while MGAM trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -3.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check MGAM's competition here
GCLWW vs TBH Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while TBH trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TBH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check TBH's competition here
GCLWW vs NFTG Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check NFTG's competition here
GCLWW vs MYPSW Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 889.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW and MYPSW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MYPSW's competition here
GCLWW vs TRUG Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 848.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while TRUG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRUG's ROE of -56.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check TRUG's competition here
GCLWW vs BHAT Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 793.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while BHAT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check BHAT's competition here
GCLWW vs GDEVW Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 281K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GDEVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check GDEVW's competition here
GCLWW vs GGL Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GCLWW has daily volatility of 0.00 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
GCLWW vs HPY Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check HPY's competition here
GCLWW vs CCNC Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check CCNC's competition here
GCLWW vs YVR Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check YVR's competition here
GCLWW vs ZNGA Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check ZNGA's competition here
GCLWW vs SCR Comparison February 2026
GCLWW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCLWW stands at 4M. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GCLWW is priced at $0.03, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCLWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCLWW's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCLWW is less volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCLWW.Check SCR's competition here