Axcap Ventures Inc.
Axcap Ventures Inc. (GARLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GARLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARLF | $0.09 | -0.46% | 26.3M | -1.47 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $287.00 | -0.99% | 334.2B | 43.88 | $6.54 | +0.91% |
| CNSWF | $3,445.86 | -1.88% | 73.1B | 98.23 | $35.12 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $25.98 | +0.00% | 48.3B | -1732.00 | -$0.02 | +12.51% |
| DASTF | $33.00 | +0.37% | 44.4B | 33.63 | $1.00 | +0.86% |
| DASTY | $32.96 | -1.17% | 43.4B | 32.98 | $1.00 | +0.89% |
| WTCHF | $79.22 | +0.00% | 26.3B | 132.03 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| WIGBY | $76.49 | +0.53% | 25.4B | 127.48 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| DIDIY | $5.05 | -1.56% | 23.4B | 62.75 | $0.08 | N/A |
| XROLF | $114.91 | +3.36% | 19B | 140.13 | $0.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GARLF vs SAPGF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 334.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SAPGF trades at $287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 43.88. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SAPGF's competition here
GARLF vs CNSWF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while CNSWF trades at $3,445.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 98.23. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check CNSWF's competition here
GARLF vs INVUP Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while INVUP trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1732.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check INVUP's competition here
GARLF vs DASTF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DASTF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DASTF's competition here
GARLF vs DASTY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DASTY trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DASTY's competition here
GARLF vs WTCHF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while WTCHF trades at $79.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 132.03. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check WTCHF's competition here
GARLF vs WIGBY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while WIGBY trades at $76.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 127.48. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check WIGBY's competition here
GARLF vs DIDIY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DIDIY trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DIDIY's competition here
GARLF vs XROLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while XROLF trades at $114.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 140.13. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check XROLF's competition here
GARLF vs NEMKY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 83.28. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NEMKY's competition here
GARLF vs SGPYY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SGPYY trades at $64.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SGPYY's competition here
GARLF vs SGGEF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SGGEF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SGGEF's competition here
GARLF vs OBIIF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while OBIIF trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check OBIIF's competition here
GARLF vs NEMTF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.23. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NEMTF's competition here
GARLF vs OCLCF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while OCLCF trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check OCLCF's competition here
GARLF vs NCSYF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NCSYF trades at $157.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NCSYF's competition here
GARLF vs KGDEY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while KGDEY trades at $204.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -371.97. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check KGDEY's competition here
GARLF vs TMSNY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMSNY trades at $90.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMSNY's competition here
GARLF vs ALMFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ALMFF's competition here
GARLF vs TMNSF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMNSF's competition here
GARLF vs LIFX Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while LIFX trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 544.25. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check LIFX's competition here
GARLF vs FNOXF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check FNOXF's competition here
GARLF vs HOILF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check HOILF's competition here
GARLF vs THNOF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check THNOF's competition here
GARLF vs SRBEF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SRBEF trades at $274.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -135.40. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SRBEF's competition here
GARLF vs ASOZF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ASOZF's competition here
GARLF vs KXSCF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while KXSCF trades at $149.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 425.62. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check KXSCF's competition here
GARLF vs SMCYY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SMCYY's competition here
GARLF vs SICRF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SICRF's competition here
GARLF vs ASOZY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ASOZY's competition here
GARLF vs UBMRF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check UBMRF's competition here
GARLF vs SWONF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SWONF trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SWONF's competition here
GARLF vs KHOTF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check KHOTF's competition here
GARLF vs TMVWY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMVWY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMVWY's competition here
GARLF vs TMVWF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMVWF trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMVWF's competition here
GARLF vs QTGPF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while QTGPF trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check QTGPF's competition here
GARLF vs ESKEF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ESKEF's competition here
GARLF vs FREKF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while FREKF trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check FREKF's competition here
GARLF vs IPEU Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check IPEU's competition here
GARLF vs TMOAY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMOAY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -20.47. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMOAY's competition here
GARLF vs WEMXF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check WEMXF's competition here
GARLF vs BCTCF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BCTCF's competition here
GARLF vs MAGTF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check MAGTF's competition here
GARLF vs VOBIF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check VOBIF's competition here
GARLF vs KNNNF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while KNNNF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check KNNNF's competition here
GARLF vs ZEUCF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ZEUCF's competition here
GARLF vs LTTHF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check LTTHF's competition here
GARLF vs GBGPF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 954.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check GBGPF's competition here
GARLF vs ESIGF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ESIGF's competition here
GARLF vs EGHSF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 923.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while EGHSF trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check EGHSF's competition here
GARLF vs BHPA Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BHPA's competition here
GARLF vs BTRCF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BTRCF trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BTRCF's competition here
GARLF vs NPACY Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NPACY's competition here
GARLF vs TMOAF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TMOAF's competition here
GARLF vs SLVFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SLVFF's competition here
GARLF vs TTMZF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 649.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TTMZF's competition here
GARLF vs XMMRF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check XMMRF's competition here
GARLF vs NPACF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NPACF's competition here
GARLF vs PXPHF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check PXPHF's competition here
GARLF vs NXLLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NXLLF's competition here
GARLF vs RWWI Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check RWWI's competition here
GARLF vs NSWEF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NSWEF's competition here
GARLF vs CMDXF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while CMDXF trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check CMDXF's competition here
GARLF vs BRDLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BRDLF's competition here
GARLF vs BVSFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BVSFF's competition here
GARLF vs IQGLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check IQGLF's competition here
GARLF vs CHNVF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check CHNVF's competition here
GARLF vs TCYSF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TCYSF trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 123.64. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TCYSF's competition here
GARLF vs BLKLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BLKLF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -67.20. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BLKLF's competition here
GARLF vs RPGHF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check RPGHF's competition here
GARLF vs PSSWF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check PSSWF's competition here
GARLF vs LCHTF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check LCHTF's competition here
GARLF vs RTME Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check RTME's competition here
GARLF vs ELMFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ELMFF's competition here
GARLF vs JAPPF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check JAPPF's competition here
GARLF vs DOTDF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DOTDF's competition here
GARLF vs ABXXF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ABXXF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ABXXF's competition here
GARLF vs PLDIF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check PLDIF's competition here
GARLF vs BAINF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 299.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while BAINF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check BAINF's competition here
GARLF vs RLLMF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while RLLMF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 201.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check RLLMF's competition here
GARLF vs IVUFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check IVUFF's competition here
GARLF vs CIGMF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check CIGMF's competition here
GARLF vs EXMXF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check EXMXF's competition here
GARLF vs LOQPF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check LOQPF's competition here
GARLF vs MCAP Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 265.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while MCAP trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check MCAP's competition here
GARLF vs SMTEF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SMTEF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SMTEF's competition here
GARLF vs DAHLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DAHLF's competition here
GARLF vs FXSRF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check FXSRF's competition here
GARLF vs FBSFF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check FBSFF's competition here
GARLF vs EXSPF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check EXSPF's competition here
GARLF vs WONDF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check WONDF's competition here
GARLF vs NEOJF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check NEOJF's competition here
GARLF vs SYZLF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while SYZLF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -163.75. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check SYZLF's competition here
GARLF vs CBSZF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check CBSZF's competition here
GARLF vs FHGDF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, FHGDF has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while FHGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas FHGDF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FHGDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check FHGDF's competition here
GARLF vs TCIIF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check TCIIF's competition here
GARLF vs ITMSF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, ITMSF has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while ITMSF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas ITMSF's P/E ratio is 49.60. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ITMSF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ITMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check ITMSF's competition here
GARLF vs IARGF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check IARGF's competition here
GARLF vs DFORF Comparison August 2025
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 26.3M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.09, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.47, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.Check DFORF's competition here