Axcap Ventures Inc.
Axcap Ventures Inc. GARLF Peers
See (GARLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARLF | $0.14 | -2.24% | 25.49M | -3.49 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $299.40 | +0.15% | 349.28B | 55.04 | $5.44 | +0.88% |
| CNSWF | $3,627.57 | -0.90% | 76.87B | 103.44 | $35.07 | +0.11% |
| NEMKY | $20.50 | -21.15% | 59.19B | 60.29 | $0.34 | +0.45% |
| DASTF | $39.65 | +4.67% | 52.08B | 40.05 | $0.99 | +0.70% |
| INVUP | $27.51 | N/A | 51.12B | -1834.00 | -$0.02 | +11.81% |
| DASTY | $38.15 | -0.03% | 50.11B | 38.54 | $0.99 | +0.65% |
| WTCHF | $65.98 | -0.79% | 21.89B | 108.17 | $0.61 | +0.16% |
| WIGBY | $65.42 | +0.00% | 21.71B | 109.04 | $0.60 | +0.20% |
| DIDIY | $4.78 | +2.58% | 20.80B | 119.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GARLF vs SAPGF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 349.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SAPGF trades at $299.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 55.04. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs CNSWF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 76.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while CNSWF trades at $3,627.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 103.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NEMKY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DASTF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 52.08B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DASTF trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs INVUP Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.12B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while INVUP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DASTY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 50.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DASTY trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs WTCHF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while WTCHF trades at $65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 108.17. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs WIGBY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 21.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while WIGBY trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 109.04. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DIDIY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 20.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DIDIY trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 119.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs XROLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 17.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while XROLF trades at $111.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 129.94. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SGGEF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SGGEF trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SGPYY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SGPYY trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NEMTF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs OBIIF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs OCLCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 11.97B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NCSYF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NCSYF trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ALMFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs KGDEY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while KGDEY trades at $177.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -321.87. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs THNOF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while THNOF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs HOILF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMNSF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMSNY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMSNY trades at $74.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs FNOXF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs LIFX Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while LIFX trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 503.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SMCYY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SICRF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs KXSCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while KXSCF trades at $142.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 408.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ASOZY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ASOZF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SRBEF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMVWF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMVWY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMVWY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs UBMRF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs QTGPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while QTGPF trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs KHOTF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ESKEF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs IPEU Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs FREKF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while FREKF trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.88. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs WEMXF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMOAY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMOAY trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs MAGTF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs KNNNF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while KNNNF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SWONF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SWONF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -797.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ZEUCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs EGHSF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while EGHSF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs LTTHF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs VOBIF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 969.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while VOBIF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs GBGPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 966.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ESIGF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BTRCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 811.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BTRCF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SLVFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BVSFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TTMZF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 643.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TMOAF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BCTCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NPACF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs PXPHF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NPACY Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs CMDXF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 505.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while CMDXF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs RWWI Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NXLLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.10M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NSWEF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TCYSF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 459.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TCYSF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 221.43. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BLKLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 458.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BLKLF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -77.71. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BRDLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.33M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs IQGLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs CHNVF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs RPGHF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 375.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs PSSWF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs LCHTF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs PLDIF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 362.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while PLDIF trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 80.73. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs JAPPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ELMFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs RLLMF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 316.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while RLLMF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs BAINF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 307.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while BAINF trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DOTDF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs IVUFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 295.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs CIGMF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs GBUX Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 284.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while GBUX trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -60.20. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs ABXXF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 276.84M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while ABXXF trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs LOQPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while LOQPF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs EXMXF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 267.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DAHLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs FXSRF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs FBSFF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs MCAP Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 194.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while MCAP trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SMTEF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs WONDF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 159.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while WONDF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs SYZLF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 158.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while SYZLF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -338.15. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs IARGF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs EXSPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs CBSZF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs TCIIF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 151.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs DFORF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while DFORF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs WECMF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs NEOJF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs THNCF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 126.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while THNCF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs PSHPF Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.
GARLF vs RTME Comparison
GARLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARLF stands at 25.49M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, GARLF is priced at $0.14, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARLF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.49, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, GARLF's ROE is -0.81%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARLF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARLF.